Maryscott O'Connor says her liberal Web log, My Left Wing, is "one long, sustained scream." (By David Finkel -- The Washington Post)
You know, one just wastes so much energy being angry all the time. It's really not worth it. Looks like she shrieks and yells a lot.
You have to feel sorry for the kid, doomed to grow up in that hell on Earth.
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
"Powerlessness" is O'Connor's explanation. "This is born of powerlessness."
Well, I'm glad to see she's done Step 1!
Prayers for the child of this hateful, diseased and pathetic woman.
Whose objectives do her rants serve?
Should she be ignored?
If she shouldn't be ignored, how should she be dealt with, and by whom?
The modern Left substitutes rage in place of positive policy ideas...because they have no positive ideas for the U.S.
They want the nuclear family destroyed; gay parents, gay children, aborted children, children out of wedlock, children from multiple fathers, children with multiple mothers, children with different last names than their parents, government raising children without parents via welfare and rules and programs, etc.
They want higher taxes. They want France to determine our foreign policy. They want to surrender to radical Islamics who would put them in burkhas.
They'd gladly fight a Republican, but they'd never fight a terrorist.
They want to put as many obstacles as possible in the way of our economy such as banning nuclear power, mandating various ever-changing blends of fuel, banning drilling for new fuel, banning refining new fuel, banning new home construction (e.g. "urban sprawl"), banning smoking in restaurants, etc.
If it damages our society (e.g. recreational drugs) then they are for it; if it benefits our society (e.g. border control) then they are against it.
Pause
But they can't very well run on a political platform of the above.
They can't win the Heartland by banning guns and holding "have an abortion at my house" slumber parties for their teenagers.
And they aren't going to change.
So this leaves them without any expressed, admitted, public policy ideas.
In other words, it leaves them with rage. President Bush is bad if he jails Saddam Hussein and he's bad if he ignores North Korea. If Bush cures cancer they'll b!tch that he didn't cure AIDs.
Pick *any* daily news headline and the modern Left will spin it such that it's Bush's fault.
It's all that they've got.
The Washington Post writer had never been to a Blog before he decided to write this piece! How the hell would he know what was going on?
I always wondered if leftist blogers were alcholics.
She looks deranged. Someone pour her another wine.
Regards, Ivan
Good grief!
What a read!
What a loon!
For the terminally dysfunctional, temporary relief comes in the form of being able say that everything that goes wrong in their lives is----BUSH'S fault!
Paraphrased: "I'm an overgrown 2-year-old having a temper tantrum. And I'm bragging about it."
The left has never been known for their communication skills.
Unintentionally hilarious, from the picture to her wine & cigarettes habit to the extremely limited vocabulary of this harpy and her correspondents (Shannika?!?!?).
Bush. Lied. [expletive] [expletive]
Sigh....anyone want to meet Maryscott for a cocktail after work? Anyone?
....and anyone would care what this airheaded b**ch thinks.................why??
Is she a schoolteacher? She looks like a schoolteacher.
Maybe she will explode all over the walls!