Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress Nears Deal on Illegal Immigrants (breaking on cable networks)
AP/Yahoo News ^ | 4-6-06 | DAVID ESPO

Posted on 04/06/2006 8:33:43 AM PDT by STARWISE

WASHINGTON - In a last stab at compromise, Senate Republicans and Democrats reported progress Thursday toward agreement on legislation opening the way to legal status and eventual citizenship for many of the 11 million immigrants now in the U.S. illegally.

"There's been tremendous progress overnight," said Sen. Harry Reid (news, bio, voting record) of Nevada, the Democratic leader, while Majority Leader Bill Frist also expressed optimism that a long-sought compromise might be at hand.

There was no immediate reaction from President Bush, who has made immigration legislation a key priority.

The developments occurred after Frist unveiled a new bill late Wednesday night on the subject as the Senate headed into a test vote on the most sweeping immigration bill in two decades.

In general, the legislation would provide for enhanced border security, regulate the flow of future immigrants into the United States and settle the legal fate of the estimated 11 million men, women and children already in the country.

It was the fate of the illegal immigrant population that proved hardest to legislate, and it has left the Senate on the verge of gridlock for days.

(snip)

Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass., as well as other key senators met before the vote to review terms of a proposed compromise.

In general, it would require illegal immigrants who have been in the United States between two years and five years to return to their home country briefly, then re-enter as temporary workers. They could then begin a process of seeking citizenship.

Illegal immigrants here longer than five years would not be required to return home; those in the country less than two years would be required to leave without assurances of returning, and take their place in line with others seeking entry papers.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; aliens; amnesty; borderlist; buchananwasright; compromise; congress; guestworker; idiotsonparade; immigration; senatetraitors; soldout; tancredo4president; theswimmer; traitors; trashingamerica; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,361-1,3801,381-1,4001,401-1,420 ... 1,981-1,982 next last
To: JeffAtlanta

Who care about the vote? WE ARE BEING ROBBED AND JUST SITTING HERE>

THERE ARE NO REPUBLICANS OR DEMOCRATS RIGHT NOW....

ARE YOU AN AMERICAN? IF yes WE MUST UNITE AND STAND WITH ONE VOICE>>>>


1,381 posted on 04/06/2006 2:58:44 PM PDT by Texas4ever (Anything off the dollar menu :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1372 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3
Are either of you accusing the President of the United States of "treason"?

At this point no. If he continues to let President Fox set out our immigration policy then yes.

1,382 posted on 04/06/2006 3:00:00 PM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1378 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper
It had everything to do with the wall.
That wall will be useless if the attacks are carried out from within.


Nonsense! The wall in Israel is not complete yet, and as such it is not perfect yet. You're simply trying to justify slave labor rates for your farm.
1,383 posted on 04/06/2006 3:00:50 PM PDT by GarySpFc (Jesus on Immigration, John 10:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1379 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

What compromise? From everything I've read, the Repubs are the New Demoncrats on this issue. I get scared when they're in agreement with Kennedy, Schumer, and other prominent DemonRats.


1,384 posted on 04/06/2006 3:00:51 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity ("Sharpei diem - Seize the wrinkled dog.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy; BigSkyFreeper
So we don't need to rise to your standard of an inpenetrable wall. Just one to signfiicantly slow the flow, when used in conjunction with additional enforcement within the country.

And it could have a snowball effect as well. As the number of border jumpers is reduced, it will be easier to detain them instead of playing catch-and-release. That in turn will make for even more of a deterrent, which in turn will reduce the number even further. Then we can concentrate more on internal enforcement (deportations, etc.), which would provide even more of a deterrent.

Just think of what effect it would have on someone living in Mexico if his friends and kin constantly keep returning home after being rebuffed in the attempt to get in the U.S., complete with tales of how arduous the trip was, and ultimately all for nothing. The psychological effect would be considerable.

1,385 posted on 04/06/2006 3:00:54 PM PDT by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1363 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Since the first of the 12 million wouldn't be eligible for citizenship for eleven years, we've got plenty of time to work that out.

That's what we said in 1986 and it just got worse.

1,386 posted on 04/06/2006 3:00:59 PM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1380 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta
It's not clear why you insist that a wall must be 100% effective to be of value.

It's not clear to you, because I'm not insisting that it can, will, or should be.

1,387 posted on 04/06/2006 3:01:41 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1377 | View Replies]

To: vik
Well, I suppose that's true.

I've seen people be persuaded away from certain beliefs, but like you say, very few true believers reconsider their prejudices.

1,388 posted on 04/06/2006 3:01:52 PM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("The moment that someone wants to forbid caricatures, that is the moment we publish them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1367 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
illegals because they occupy FIVE PERCENT of the work force?

That was 2005. There are 3 to 10 thousand more coming in per day taking jobs THAT AMERICANS WILL DO, as you sit there twisting facts just to appease some lop sided political agenda which adds more visas,etc. etc. etc.

What it does is prove that Americans will do those jobs and are doing most of them. You and your pals would have us believe the economy will shut down if we don't keep the gate open.

1,389 posted on 04/06/2006 3:02:24 PM PDT by WatchingInAmazement ("Nothing is more expensive than cheap labor," prof. Vernon Briggs, labor economist Cornell Un.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1369 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46

>>>If Mexico wants that economic inflow, it will cooperate in implementing the system. <<<<
You have never been to Mexico I take it.

(They know there will be no enforcement ... who are we kidding?)


1,390 posted on 04/06/2006 3:02:49 PM PDT by investigateworld (Abortion stops a beating heart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

Comment #1,391 Removed by Moderator

To: inquest
Just think of what effect it would have on someone living in Mexico if his friends and kin constantly keep returning home after being rebuffed in the attempt to get in the U.S., complete with tales of how arduous the trip was, and ultimately all for nothing. The psychological effect would be considerable.

And so would the monetary effect as many illegals pay "coyotes" to lead them across. Get sent back after you've already spent your life savings to give to a coyote and you're not going to try it again.

1,392 posted on 04/06/2006 3:03:01 PM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1385 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta
"If this bill passes, the GOP will be in the same shape it was in 1976 and 1992."

And that will be more than they deserve for their betrayal.

The way the GOP has squandered its political capital on this issue is unforgivable.

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

1,393 posted on 04/06/2006 3:03:06 PM PDT by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1346 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper
Even with stringent and strong enforcement, both with manpower, the strength of a double layered fence, and sheer technological wizardry, we'll slow it down, but we'll never cut the flow off entirely.

Considering what we have now equates with putting a band aid on a shotgun wound, build the fence.

1,394 posted on 04/06/2006 3:03:09 PM PDT by SealSeven (Moving at the speed of dark.... Even "nothing" takes up space.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1347 | View Replies]

To: Peach

"People here for less than 2 years have to leave. That's a good first step."

Nah...I heard it was anyone who was not here before November 1998.


1,395 posted on 04/06/2006 3:03:29 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc
You're simply trying to justify slave labor rates for your farm.

How you gathered that from a wall is goofy.

1,396 posted on 04/06/2006 3:04:01 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1383 | View Replies]

To: SealSeven
Considering what we have now equates with putting a band aid on a shotgun wound, build the fence.

It was a shotgun wound 20 years ago.

1,397 posted on 04/06/2006 3:04:55 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1394 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper
It's not clear to you, because I'm not insisting that it can, will, or should be.

Then you're not doing a good job of expressing yourself as everyone else in this thread is reading your views on the wall the same way as I am.

To be clear, would a wall that did not stop 100% of illegal immigration be of any value?

1,398 posted on 04/06/2006 3:05:22 PM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1387 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper
It had everything to do with the wall.

Unless you're saying that the terrorist who launched the RPG attack got over the wall himself, then the attack has nothing to do with the present discussion, which is the effectiveness of physical barriers in preventing unauthorized entry.

1,399 posted on 04/06/2006 3:05:43 PM PDT by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1379 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
As with your example of Specter, "sometimes a people get the leaders they deserve."

Pennsylvania got what they deserve, and obviously, most Ohioans wanted Dewine at the time. Maybe they will choose a democrat this time and teach the GOP a lesson.

Then a Democrat will have 6yrs to lure more people over to the promise of socialist pandering.

You seem to think the "dirty work" is sneaking a good conservative into office instead of RINO's and Democrats. It's not. A real conservative winning an election is a result of the real dirty work of keeping the majority of the public supportive of conservative principles.

When the TABC started raiding Texas bars for 'potential' DWIs, Texans went "up in arms" and the TABC/Legislature backed down.

When 'the people' stop fighting those little dirty work fights here and there, then the leaders will follow.

I appreciate your motivation, but I think you're painting a termite infested house!

If Dewine got in, and the populace has no pull to merely bend him to their overwhelming desire to solve the border problem in the fashion you desire, then you're finding yourself in a minority that is not convincing other people.

You believe that if you jolt the public with a Rat for 6 years, then the GOP will be eager to get you and other real conservatives on board next time. I think the spineless GOP will be even more spineless after losing people of your determination, and thus will tend to pander and wander even further from conservative principles. You and I can politely disagree on this since only time will tell.

1,400 posted on 04/06/2006 3:05:56 PM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 889 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,361-1,3801,381-1,4001,401-1,420 ... 1,981-1,982 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson