Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/17/2006 6:15:20 AM PST by Dark Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
To: Dark Skies

This is an outrage. What the h#ll are they thinking in the White House?


2 posted on 02/17/2006 6:18:13 AM PST by be-baw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies

The WH is wrong on this one. We will not hold still for it.


3 posted on 02/17/2006 6:19:30 AM PST by ANGGAPO (LayteGulfBeachClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies

Definitely another "Harriet Miers" moment.


4 posted on 02/17/2006 6:20:43 AM PST by SquirrelKing (Contrary to popular belief, America is not a democracy, it is a Chucktatorship.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies

Bush administration sometimes takes 2 steps forward and 3 backward. This is just stupid and damn right people should be ticked off.


5 posted on 02/17/2006 6:21:53 AM PST by SideoutFred (Save us from the Looney Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies
Aw..you guys are just a bunch of W haters..that's all.

/sarc

6 posted on 02/17/2006 6:24:15 AM PST by deadrock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies

This is very weird. Secy of State Rice has been out giving conciliatory messages all week to various Arab and Muslim groups and their supporters (such as the Zapatero gov in Spain) and now we have the WH blandly assuring us that having what are essentially our enemies running our ports is no biggie. I guess we might as well all go out and get our burkas fitted now.

Seriously, I suspect that I am overreacting and reading too much into what were probably routine remarks by Rice and didn't mean much of anything, but on the other hand, I think a bit of overreaction may be warranted for this port deal.

I know the Administration wants to act as if Muslim nations are just like any others, and just want economic advantage and have to be treated like any others - but the problem is that they are not, and many of them are in fact our sworn enemies or have large elements in them that are our sworn enemies. Ignoring this fact won't change it.


7 posted on 02/17/2006 6:24:40 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies

This is what happens when you turn the decision over to a bunch of lawyers who parse words in a few thousand laws and regulations and then come back and say, "we see no legal issues anywhere". They need to get someone with the gonads (sorry, Condi) to say Bullsh*t! on this!!


9 posted on 02/17/2006 6:25:38 AM PST by poncho67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies

Is there a gigantic bribe in this somewhere? Not to the WH but elsewhere?


10 posted on 02/17/2006 6:25:38 AM PST by squarebarb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies

There are some serious security issues at stake here - the administration really needs to rethink this one.


11 posted on 02/17/2006 6:27:44 AM PST by A Jovial Cad ("If you kill enough of them, they stop fighting." -General Curtis LeMay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies

"Foreign control of our ports, which are vital to homeland security, is a risky proposition," said Sen. Charles Schumer, New York Democrat.

This is a crazy world when I wake up one morning agreeing with Chuckie Shumer on anything.


12 posted on 02/17/2006 6:28:59 AM PST by Leatherneck_MT (An honest man can feel no pleasure in the exercise of power over his fellow citizens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies

THIS IS THE MOST ASSININE DECISION TO COME OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE IN A LONG TIME. BUSH MUST BE ASLEEP AT THE WHEEL. E-MAIL THE PRESIDENT, SENATORS & CONGRESSMEN AND URGE THAT THIS BE STOPPED!!


18 posted on 02/17/2006 6:44:42 AM PST by KenmcG414 (wHAT'ST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies; SittinYonder
When an odd alliance of Messrs. Schumer and Coburn and the New York Times agree that the deal was rushed and dangerous, the White House should know it has a problem.

And I agree with Schumer and the NYT also, that's a rarity. (I already agree with Coburn a lot, so that's normal)

21 posted on 02/17/2006 6:49:23 AM PST by eyespysomething (Iran is like the slightly retarded cousin that keeps asking Santa for a shotgun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies

This lunacy needs to be stopped in its tracks. I can't think of a better way for Al Queda to get into this country than by infiltrating this port business! And the UAE recognizes the Taliban to this very day! Someone at the White House must be smoking dope to have thought this was a good idea. Call, write, and email your senators to stop this stupid, dangerous deal.


22 posted on 02/17/2006 6:51:20 AM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies
Forget the #$%* bird flu! We have a pandemic of VIRAL IDIOCY attacking Washington, D.C. as evidenced by the fact that it has infected in White House to make such STUPID decisions! Wrong is wrong, I don't care which party it comes from. I refuse to be a political lemming. PROTECT OUR CITIZENS, NOW! REVERSE THIS DECISION!
25 posted on 02/17/2006 7:02:38 AM PST by OB1kNOb (Imagine if there were no hypothetical situations......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies
This is not an "excellent editorial" at all. In fact, it is a sh!tty editorial that is based on a completely erroneous presentation of facts.

The notion that the UAE firm is paying $6.8 billion to acquire six major U.S. ports probably comes as a huge surprise to those agencies that currently own and operate these ports and have no intention of selling them.

This is the kind of idiotic ranting that I would expect to find in a Paul Krugman column or a Howard Dean speech.

28 posted on 02/17/2006 7:16:20 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Leave a message with the rain . . . you can find me where the wind blows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies
The White House is not listening because it is completely manufactured hysteria being pushed by Chuckie Schumer and the Democrat Senate Election Committee. Simply UNBELIVEABLE that Conservatives are allowing themselves to be drawn into this completely phony story being directed by the DNC.

All the various National security agencies have given this company a clean bill of health. This company MERELY does port operations, it has ZERO security functions. Security is a Federal Govt responsibility. The ONLY people freaking are the Democrat Senators. This works for them on two levels.

ONE it allows the Dems to fraudulently posture as "tough on National Security". Two, it allows the Senate Democrats to lay the ground work for a "Have the Feds take over the ports" like they did the baggage screener at the airport and add thousands to the Govt Union rolls.

Just DUMB for Conservatives to push Chucky Schumers phony PR line for him.

29 posted on 02/17/2006 7:16:55 AM PST by MNJohnnie ("Close the UN, Keep Gitmo!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies

^


38 posted on 02/17/2006 7:21:49 AM PST by Frank T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies
Three words of advice: Follow The Money!!!

Guaranteed that there's a lobbyist and or US firm tied to this.

45 posted on 02/17/2006 7:37:00 AM PST by O6ret
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies

I'm curious to see if the donks are going to do any of the heavy lifting on this one particularly when it comes to the "jobs" issue. More likely, they'll just be happy to demagogue it.


49 posted on 02/17/2006 7:43:40 AM PST by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies
I let the WH and Cheney know that I am opposed to this whole thing last night. Hoepfully they are getting allot of emails against this garbage.

Schumer is already on board, so he and I agree on 1 thing, but even if he wasn't, I wouldn't waste the email. Clinton, I won't waste it, and my congresscritter is such a socialist, he's also a waste of time.....

50 posted on 02/17/2006 7:47:00 AM PST by b4its2late (Terrorists will either succeed in changing our way of life, or we will change theirs. - Rummy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson