Posted on 02/04/2006 2:59:03 AM PST by HAL9000
NO of course not we will have to atleast let them break 20 resolutions and laws of the Devil's UN.
it means the UN will now engage in decades of silly hand slapping Iran...
There's not time. I agree that would be the UN's usual way of (not) dealing with the situation, but I do believe that the major powers see this coming to a crisis sooner rather than later. I have a really bad feeling about this, especially when combined with the idiocy in the islamofacist world about these stupid cartoons. These people make me sick. What about our right not to be offended by them?
Iran's leaders are about as bright as Saddam. Military action by the US is inevitable.
Algeria and Libya abstaining. That is interesting. the other abstainers were no surprise.
Right on! Similar to the 14 UN Resolutions against Saddam Hussein! Although this time survival exigencies may trigger action a little sooner than in a decade.
March is the due date for Iran's nuclear test - probably of the underground type. ETA March 19th. While the nuke expected to be exploded is a "big old thing", it will be meant to underline Iran's scare tactic, threat profile rather than their actual capability to deploy a missile launched nuclear weapon.
3 words. Unrestricted submarine warfare.
"3 words. Unrestricted submarine warfare."
Oh, looking for the link of news story that just recently, Donald Rumsfeld just ordered a retrofit of several nuclear trident missles to be fitted with conventional warheads. In the article was quoted as being for Iranian situation.
<<Algeria and Libya abstaining. That is interesting. the <<other abstainers were no surprise.
Why did Belarus abstain?
they get at least 17 resolutions this time...get the 18th then they might get verbally reprimanded.
It's on.
The coming Iranian US war that is.
Perhaps Belarus needed a show of independence from Russia and the other powers that be. Their long time president (read dictator) is facing another "election" this year. They have also refused a US and EU meet in their country concerning their elections.
It means we waste more time. Bush bowed to the EU and went the diplomatic route -- which everyone knew would never work. The end is in sight and it ain't pretty.
We have gone "the diplomatic route" because our best assessment is that we can afford the time.
Despite various media reports, nobody in the general public knows the state of Iranian nuclear weapons development. But the POTUS knows, and that is driving our current strategy.
This is exactly why we need to make sure an elect a Republican president. We might need to take action. North Korea too.
"I believe Israel will handle this before anybody does."
I agree. I think that they might just bomb their facilities. What could Iran do?..lol
Oooh, they're quaking in their boots now. The might IAEA has spoken.
It'll happen before the end of March... I just hope they don't skimp.
How many resolutions need to be ignored before the UN double-dog-dares Iran? When will Scott Ritter and Hans be moving to Iran?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.