Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SENATOR FEINSTEIN TO VOTE NO ON CLOTURE (WILL VOTE YES ON FILIBUSTER)
Feinstein ^ | 1/27/06

Posted on 01/27/2006 1:00:31 PM PST by areafiftyone

From DiFi's office:

Senator Feinstein to Vote No on Cloture for the Nomination of Judge Samuel Alito to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court

Washington, DC – U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) today announced that she will vote no on cloture regarding the nomination of Judge Samuel A. Alito, Jr. to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court.

“Based on a very long and thoughtful analysis of the record and transcript, which I tried to indicate in my floor statement yesterday, I’ve decided that I will vote no on cloture.”


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: 109th; alito; alitovote; billnelson; ca; feinstein; filibuster; fl; obstructionistdems; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 361-371 next last
To: golfisnr1
Death wish!

Yep, and good for her (and all of us) to strive to achieve this.

121 posted on 01/27/2006 1:51:48 PM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

They will never stop behaving like babies. When they win an election, they can pick a USSC judge. The republicans confirmed Ginsberg & Alito is not even close to her on the "extreme" measurement. Anyone who watched those hearings know Alito is more than qualified for the job.


122 posted on 01/27/2006 1:51:59 PM PST by Feiny (Health nuts are going to feel stupid someday, lying in hospitals dying of nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Eva

Frist has the votes to go nuclear. Period.

Now, he WON'T if we go nuclear just to do it like some on this thread suggest.

But, if he does it because Alito is filibustered and cloture fails, he will have 50 votes.


123 posted on 01/27/2006 1:52:42 PM PST by rwfromkansas (http://xanga.com/rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

Actually, what have they got to lose if they filibuster?

If they don't, Soros might cut off the teat.


124 posted on 01/27/2006 1:53:34 PM PST by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
Alexandar?!

C'mon!

Alright, I'll grant you that the cry baby from Ohio might flake out.

Now where are the obstructionists going to find their next three marks?

Look, no one has less faith in the feckless, pusillanimous weenies in the Republican conference than I do, but to suggest that six of them-and Senator Nelson-would abandon ship on the nuke option is absurd.

They had the votes for nuking before the Gang of 7 arrived.

The only reason we still have the judicial filibuster is because Senator Frist was too weak to corral rogues like John McCain and his mini-me, Lindsay Graham.

Trust me, he's learned from that mistake.

125 posted on 01/27/2006 1:53:42 PM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham ("Liberals aren't neighborhood people." -Daniel Patrick Moynihan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Almost rather than changing the rules, I would rather see Frist make them actually filibuster and stand up and speak. But never lay out any more business for the senate to do until the vote comes. Make the democrats earn it. I wonder if John Kerry can break Strom Thurmond's record? I doubt it.


126 posted on 01/27/2006 1:53:57 PM PST by Mr. Blonde (You know, Happy Time Harry, just being around you kinda makes me want to die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

I hope so.


127 posted on 01/27/2006 1:54:08 PM PST by fatima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Doesnt matter, he will vote yes for cloture.


128 posted on 01/27/2006 1:54:57 PM PST by Pimpmygop (The right way is not always the nice way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Ben Nelson of Nebraska is now taking a tally of how people want him to vote.

He said he would vote "yes" for Alito earlier, but now he's not sure.


129 posted on 01/27/2006 1:55:34 PM PST by eyespysomething (For you to insult me, I must first value your opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone; Cboldt; Bahbah
E. Benjamin Nelson (D-NE) John McCain (R-AZ) Mike DeWine (R-OH) John Warner (R-VA) Joe Lieberman (D-CT) Robert Byrd (D-WV) Susan Collins (R-ME) Mary Landrieu (D-LA) Mark Pryor (D-AR) Olympia Snowe (R-ME) Lindsey Graham (R-SC) Ken Salazar (D-CO) Lincoln Chaffee (R-RI) Daniel K. Inouye (D-HI)
10 posted on 01/27/2006 1:06:16 PM PST by Cboldt
===========================================================
To: Bahbah
No she wasn't. It was:
DEMOCRATS
Joseph I. Lieberman, Connecticut; Robert C. Byrd, West Virginia; E. Benjamin Nelson, Nebraska; Mary Landrieu, Louisiana; Daniel Inouye, Hawaii; Mark Pryor, Arkansas; Ken Salazar, Colorado
11 posted on 01/27/2006 1:06:26 PM PST by areafiftyone

LOL, Fiftyone! 10 seconds late and a dollar short. Gotta get your typing speed up!

130 posted on 01/27/2006 1:55:37 PM PST by IonImplantGuru (Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Never again. Never again will a Ruth Bader Ginsburg be nominated for the Supreme Court without plenty of opposition in the Senate. This is utter nonsense. The Dems can't pick the Supreme Court when they're out of power. It's as simple as that.

And the New York Times has become a piece of utter trash.


131 posted on 01/27/2006 1:55:41 PM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
“Based on a very long and thoughtful analysis of the record and transcript, which I tried to indicate in my floor statement yesterday, I’ve decided that I will maintain a political stance and fore go promoting the qualifications of Judge Alito and vote no on cloture.”
132 posted on 01/27/2006 1:56:10 PM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething

Yes it seems quite a few Democrat Senators are doing that - It seems they are a bunch of cowards who can't stick it out.


133 posted on 01/27/2006 1:56:13 PM PST by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

I think it was the Hairball show last night that I was watching..Chrissy and guest were opining that with filibuster talk, and negative talk about Alito all this weekend...

the polls may take the "for" number down to at least 50% or lower...thus, giving the dems the "proof" they need to go ahead and filibuster...

I know I saw that somewhere...and I was just laughing..but, I wonder if some of these dems are waiting for rigged up poll results.


134 posted on 01/27/2006 1:56:31 PM PST by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Thats incorrect. There are more then 7.. There are just 7 that said it.. There are close to 11-15. We only 3.

Trust me.. there will be no filibuster.


135 posted on 01/27/2006 1:56:49 PM PST by Pimpmygop (The right way is not always the nice way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red
Wow.

Scott McClellan actually said something witty for once.

Kudos to him.

136 posted on 01/27/2006 1:57:22 PM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham ("Liberals aren't neighborhood people." -Daniel Patrick Moynihan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
go ON THE RECORD PUBLICLY to say they will vote for the nuclear option. when that total equals 50, that's the only way the left is going to be silenced on this.

You know, I'd prefer that Frist knows he has the 50 votes and doesn't go public with it and swats down the Dems' filibuster. That would also silence them, not only now, but also in the future with lower court nominees. And for all we know that is just what he is doing.

137 posted on 01/27/2006 1:57:30 PM PST by Chesterbelloc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething

Source?


138 posted on 01/27/2006 1:58:00 PM PST by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Pimpmygop

I hope you are right. Alot of the Democrat Senators are worried because DUers are threatening to withhold votes for them.


139 posted on 01/27/2006 1:58:03 PM PST by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething

Ben Nelson of NEBRASKA does not know how his constituents want him to vote on Alito??? Liar.


140 posted on 01/27/2006 1:58:05 PM PST by txrangerette ("We are fighting al-Qaeda, NOT Aunt Sadie"...Dick Cheney commenting on the wiretaps!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 361-371 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson