Skip to comments.
Samuel Alito ~ Senate Judiciary Hearing [LIVE THREAD] (Day-3)
Senate Judiciary ^
| 1-11-06
| Senate Judiciary
Posted on 01/11/2006 5:01:17 AM PST by OXENinFLA
Day 3: Questioning Continues
This morning, Round 1 concludes with Senators on the Judiciary Cmte. who did not question nominee Alito yesterday. During Round 2, questioning is limited to 20 minutes for each of the eight- een senators. Chairman Arlen Specter (R-PA) leads off, followed by the others, alternating by party in order of seniority.
WEDS., 9:30AM ET, C-SPAN
Live LinksC-span
Judiciary LIVE LINK
FEDNET
CapitolHearings.org
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: 109th; alito; alitoakbar; alitohearings; alitorulz; babykilling; bidenisamoron; bush2rats0; clangingcymbals; demsareduds; emptybarrels; feingoldstinks; feinsteinreeks; judicialnominees; judiciary; kennedysucks; penumbra; scotus; senate; super; superduper; superduperduper; welldecided
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320, 321-340, 341-360 ... 3,801-3,808 next last
To: Dog
Judge Alito "Calipso Louie stated he pesonally saw you planting bombs underneath a dam is that True?"
To: retrokitten
Brownback on to Roe. Says Lawrence Tribe thinks Roe was badly decided.
"Roe borders on the idefensible" -- Lazarus
Liberal criticisms of Roe.
322
posted on
01/11/2006 7:15:59 AM PST
by
syriacus
(Chuck Schumer is outclassed intellectually by Bush's judicial nominees.)
To: sageb1
>>I'm waiting for someone to initiate a suit against prison psychiatrists in California who are giving drugs to inmates who show signs of "mental illness" just because they dislike homosexuals.<<
When was that?
What city?
323
posted on
01/11/2006 7:16:17 AM PST
by
netmilsmom
(God blessed me with a wonderful husband.)
To: Bahbah
Not only do I also hope it's Schumer, I hope it leaves a paper cut that really stings.
To: syriacus
Brownback pointing out that many liberals think Roe was not well-decided.
325
posted on
01/11/2006 7:17:18 AM PST
by
syriacus
(Chuck Schumer is outclassed intellectually by Bush's judicial nominees.)
To: RedBloodedAmerican
Can't have enough super duper cow bell.
326
posted on
01/11/2006 7:17:27 AM PST
by
Clint N. Suhks
(If you don't like Jesus, you can go to hell.)
Does anyone know if this is running on any of the networks?
Dad took the laptop and I have to get upstairs to Homeschool.
327
posted on
01/11/2006 7:17:42 AM PST
by
netmilsmom
(God blessed me with a wonderful husband.)
To: retrokitten
328
posted on
01/11/2006 7:17:47 AM PST
by
defconw
( Allen/Pence 2008 Operation Put Up or Shut Up)
To: Clint N. Suhks
I've got a super-duper fever!
329
posted on
01/11/2006 7:17:51 AM PST
by
GOPyouth
(De Oppresso Liber! The Tyrant is captured!)
To: Mo1
Thank you.....lol....Diane the dim. Did Dirtbag Durbin say she was going to be there to testify against Alito?
330
posted on
01/11/2006 7:18:08 AM PST
by
Jrabbit
(Kaufman County, Texas)
To: Clint N. Suhks
Will Ferrell is the funniest man alive...
That jpeg alone, no sound, is enough to make you laugh out loud... LOL!
331
posted on
01/11/2006 7:18:32 AM PST
by
nuffsenuff
(Don't get stuck on Stupid - General Russ Honore Sept 21, 2005)
To: netmilsmom
"When was that? What city?"
I'll have to search. It's been posted at least twice here. I'll post it if I can locate.
332
posted on
01/11/2006 7:18:36 AM PST
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: syriacus
Alito discussing difference between constitution and statutes.
333
posted on
01/11/2006 7:18:52 AM PST
by
syriacus
(Chuck Schumer is outclassed intellectually by Bush's judicial nominees.)
To: ken5050
Here's 2 more answers to your questions to be added.
#1- Yeah, he was trying to set a precedent. Who died and
made him a lawyer anyway?
#2- I'm not a lawyer, and I don't care what the lawyers say,
but, "findings" as Alito was talking about them are just
the things that have happened since a decision was made.
He was just saying that you can't look through a tiny
peephole if you want to find the real answer.
To: You Dirty Rats
Make fun of me if you like, but the evidence is in front of you in this hearing. There is no better time or manner to make the point that putting forward a qualified jurist with a proven constitutional track record is the best way to get a nominee on the Supreme Court.
Of course, if you want to start a separate "I was wrong about Harriet Meirs" thread, please be sure to ping me.
335
posted on
01/11/2006 7:19:20 AM PST
by
Iwo Jima
("An election is an advanced auction of stolen goods.")
To: netmilsmom
336
posted on
01/11/2006 7:19:45 AM PST
by
syriacus
(Chuck Schumer is outclassed intellectually by Bush's judicial nominees.)
To: Jrabbit
337
posted on
01/11/2006 7:20:05 AM PST
by
Mo1
(Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
To: Clint N. Suhks
He's got a fever and the only cure is more super duper cowbell.
To: syriacus
Thanks so much!
I have to go, I'll check back....
339
posted on
01/11/2006 7:20:52 AM PST
by
netmilsmom
(God blessed me with a wonderful husband.)
To: Cboldt
340
posted on
01/11/2006 7:21:10 AM PST
by
MEG33
(GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320, 321-340, 341-360 ... 3,801-3,808 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson