Is a Bush endorsement of McCain enough to sway your opinion?

[cubram]

Some on the morning talk shows suggested that McCain is the natural successor to Bush for his committment to the war, and that Bush will "pass the baton" to him.

My question is: if Bush endorses McCain will you think aboout voting for him? Personally I don't care for McCain for a number of reasons, but if I think he will continue W's legacy, I might reconsider.

What do you think?

[Tinman73]

Your right... HRC is playing it safe. That's why she should not be reelected in 06. She's just using the senate for a stepping stone.

[JOE43270]

The scary part is that I would vote for McCain over Hitlery and I wouldn't like it. He scares me to death as i believe he is the Manchurian Canidate.

[pepperhead]

LMAO

[SE Mom]

If Bush passes the "baton" to McCain..I will work ACTIVELY against McCain during primary season. I would be enormously disappointed in GWB were he to do that- and his endorsement would not change my mind about McCain for a minute. I've watched him backstab enough over the years...he's lost my respect.

[EGPWS]

if Bush endorses McCain will you think aboout voting for him? Personally I don't care for McCain for a number of reasons, but if I think he will continue W's legacy, I might reconsider.

It depends on who is running against him.

The "lesser of two evils" is still a viable consideration.

[libertyman]

Where do you get your percentage #'s? I trust THE CONSERVATIVE INDEX by The New American Magazine, which rates members of Congress according to the Constitution rather than some single-issue or left/right wing philosophy.

[cksharks]

Not no but hell no!

[Polonius]

McCain would be 72 by the time he's inaugurated ... for that reason alone I think it's a bad idea.

[doug from upland]

No. Don't vote for him if he is the nominee. If it is McCain or Hillary, and you choose Hillary, so be it. If you help her by staying home, so be it. Just be prepared for what you get. You think the first eight years was a nightmare? Just wait.

[Moiraine]

No.

[eleni121]

Simple: I will vote for any Republican running against any Demorat.

[pepperhead]

The "lesser of two evils" is still a viable consideration.

But of course evil is always evil no matter how you look at it.

[tillacum]

NO!

[libertyman]

Like I said in post #225....don't vote for McHillary (either of them), & don't sit out the '08 election. There are OTHER candidates who deserve your support that are not Republocrats.

[don-o]

maybe he has grown since this?.

[EGPWS]

But of course evil is always evil no matter how you look at it.

True, now if it were to be humanly possible to strike a firm line defining what's good and what's evil there would be no question as to one's decisiveness in such matters.

[Tribune7]

A Hillary nomination is enough to make me sway my opinion.

[Muzzle_em]

Only if McCain is running against Hitlery

[Dan from Michigan]

I can't back McCain in the general election for dogcatcher.
I don't care if the ACU rates McCain 100%. On Dan's rating, he's unacceptable.

McCain's positives - Pro-life. Sometimes good on spending.

McCain's negatives - Gun grabber, Media Whore, McCain/Feingold, pushed to ban ultimate fighting, baseball hearings for steroids, opprotunist, Keating 5 criminal, supports censorship.

That's off the top of my head.

[arasina]

Aitch ee double ell NO!