Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: ShadowDancer
Did he wear his lucky CIA hat?
2 posted on
11/12/2005 5:22:01 AM PST by
Tarpon
To: ShadowDancer
..."wrong signal"...in other words-"hey you guys...we'll quit if you just hang on till we can destroy Bush"
3 posted on
11/12/2005 5:24:02 AM PST by
Armigerous
( Non permitte illegitimi te carborundum- "Don't let the bastards grind you down")
To: ShadowDancer
Kerry the TRAITOR, has no moral authority to speak about anything to do with fighting a war.
4 posted on
11/12/2005 5:24:16 AM PST by
YOUGOTIT
To: ShadowDancer
Kerry is just lucky that President Bush didn't mention that in 1998, pre 9/11, Kerry was on ABC with Cokie Roberts and said that he wanted American boots on the ground to force regime change. He also said that the UN and our allies wouldn't be with us and would probably oppose us, and that was okay.
5 posted on
11/12/2005 5:25:24 AM PST by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: ShadowDancer
Kerry's been smearing Veterans every day since he returned from his 4 month stint in Vietnam.
6 posted on
11/12/2005 5:25:31 AM PST by
counterpunch
(~ Let O'Connor Go Home! ~)
To: ShadowDancer
7 posted on
11/12/2005 5:27:11 AM PST by
b4its2late
(Why is 'abbreviation' such a long word?)
To: ShadowDancer
"It's a dangerous day for our national security when an administration's word is no good," Kerry said.
I couldn't agree more with Kerry. Fortunately a dangerous day for his administration came before the election.
8 posted on
11/12/2005 5:28:25 AM PST by
hflynn
( Soros wouldn't make any sense even if he spelled his name backwards)
To: ShadowDancer
When are you going to release your military reccords kerry?
9 posted on
11/12/2005 5:29:16 AM PST by
ampat
To: ShadowDancer
"I was probably the main driver on the Republican side because I thought we needed the answers to whether intelligence was misused, intentionally or unintentionally," Hagel told the Omaha World-Herald in a story published Friday. Is this man a fool or what? If he thinks this is the way to get the Republican nomination for President, he is sadly mistaken.
10 posted on
11/12/2005 5:31:00 AM PST by
A.Hun
(Flagellum Dei)
To: ShadowDancer
11 posted on
11/12/2005 5:31:39 AM PST by
Manic_Episode
(Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps...)
To: ShadowDancer; HiJinx; Spiff; Da Jerdge; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; TEXOKIE; windchime; ...
Kerry, ... you horse faced, immoral, cheating, lieing, cowardly, son of an illbegotten interspecies experiment that never should have been done.
Shut yer Pie Hole!
Crawl back under the rotted pile of wood where all snakes live!
12 posted on
11/12/2005 5:33:17 AM PST by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: ShadowDancer
Interesting article. It shows the media's role in the rewrite of history. The president didn't say anything that wasn't common knowledge two years ago. He has to keep repeating himself because the average, mind-numbed TV addict has a short term memory of about 20 seconds when it comes to anything but their favorite TV programs.
Santorum was NOT criticizng the president. He made an honest assessment and his words are taken out of context. Again. Maybe he DOES have a good shot of winning a presidency, because the media is sure targeting him for preemptive political assassination.
As for Hanoi John Boy, he's pandering to the antiwar protestors in the manner of Genghis Kahn as usual. The government DID NOT "cherrypick" intelligence information in order to sell action in Iraq. The government DID make a huge tactical error in apologizing for something that didn't require an apology, but the statement WAS NOT "retracted"
13 posted on
11/12/2005 5:36:15 AM PST by
cake_crumb
(Leftist Credo: One Wing to Rule Them All and to the Dark Side Bind Them)
To: ShadowDancer
"Americans seek the truth about how the nation committed our troops to war ... Americans already know the "truth" about the beginnings of the war. It's all public record.
Now, if the liberals have a way of ending this war, besides the Cut-and-Run approach, I'd like to hear it.
14 posted on
11/12/2005 5:36:38 AM PST by
Noachian
(To Control the Judiciary The People Must First Control The Senate)
To: ShadowDancer
Kerry should have been arrested for the traitor he is years ago.
To: ShadowDancer
I see the President's words hit home. The weasels experienced the Truth and are now scurrying in pain. Hit 'em again Mr. President.
16 posted on
11/12/2005 5:39:52 AM PST by
Soul Seeker
(Mr. President: It is now time to turn over the money changers' tables.)
To: ShadowDancer
Jean Francois Kerry believes we should model ourselves after the French. He probably gets most of his foreign policy advice from Chirac.
To: ShadowDancer
Kerry heard Bush's speech?
I thought he was too busy solving France's riot problems, to take notice of the speech.
18 posted on
11/12/2005 5:42:11 AM PST by
syriacus
(Libs + French think US freeing France is AOK, but US freeing Iraq is BAD. Are they racist?)
To: ShadowDancer
"Certainly, mistakes were made," Santorum said.The whole quote: Certainly, mistakes were made, Santorum said of the wars conduct. But thats a criticism you can make of every conflict.
Nice try, AP.
20 posted on
11/12/2005 5:49:01 AM PST by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: ShadowDancer
What an utterly pathetic human being John Kerry is.
21 posted on
11/12/2005 5:49:38 AM PST by
JustaCowgirl
(The poulets have come home to roost in France.)
To: ShadowDancer
"Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid of Nevada said Democrats would continue to press for a full airing of the facts about prewar intelligence and said asking tough questions was his party's way of standing with the troops."
Harry Reid is lying. If he really wants to stand with the troops, he will caution his minions against treasonous behavior which is only prolonging engagement with Islam. If there was a unified global effort, the "war" could be over tomorrow. It is only through the efforts of the liberals/democrats/socialists that the Islamists are able to continue their cause. Reid is not interested in ending this war as it is a convenient dividing tool and because of him and others of his ilk, more troops will die.
23 posted on
11/12/2005 5:50:48 AM PST by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson