Skip to comments.
Senate Approves Cuts to Social Programs (Cutting $36B in Spending!)
Fox News ^
| November 03, 2005
| AP
Posted on 11/03/2005 3:32:35 PM PST by HHKrepublican_2
WASHINGTON The Senate on Thursday narrowly approved the first cuts since 1997 to benefit programs such as Medicare (search), Medicaid (search) and farm subsidies, giving Republicans a symbolic victory against ever-rising government spending.
The bill, passed by a 52-47 vote, would make modest cuts to the health care programs for the elderly, poor and disabled, but leave the food stamp program untouched.
The measure also would permit exploratory oil drilling in an Alaskan wilderness (search) area.
The spending battle now heads to the House, where Republicans are divided over whether to cut more deeply across a broader range of social programs.
The spending battle now heads to the House, where Republicans are divided over whether to cut more deeply across a broader range of social programs
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; awayfromthetrough; bouttime; federalspending; fiscalrestraint; pork; twofrontwar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 221-240 next last
To: calvo
Don't forget to mention whose amendment would have stripped that provision away.
(KKK Byrd)
Sen. Klegal seems more conservative than many in the GOP. How sad.
To: trubluolyguy
Gee, that's odd I could have sworn that Republicans were in power in all three branches?
Two branches only so far, legislative and administrative. The judicial branch, the supreme court, is decidedly not conservative, yet.....
82
posted on
11/03/2005 4:14:09 PM PST
by
festus
(The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
To: Sofa King
Right. Instead of taking away jobs from farm workers or home building laborers, we are going to lose high-tech jobs. Great!!
To: byteback
YEAs ---52 Alexander (R-TN) Allard (R-CO) Allen (R-VA) Bennett (R-UT) Bond (R-MO) Brownback (R-KS) Bunning (R-KY) Burns (R-MT) Burr (R-NC) Chambliss (R-GA) Coburn (R-OK) Cochran (R-MS) Cornyn (R-TX) Craig (R-ID) Crapo (R-ID) DeMint (R-SC) Dole (R-NC) Domenici (R-NM) Ensign (R-NV) Enzi (R-WY) Frist (R-TN) Graham (R-SC) Grassley (R-IA) Gregg (R-NH) Hagel (R-NE) Hatch (R-UT) Hutchison (R-TX) Inhofe (R-OK) Isakson (R-GA) Kyl (R-AZ) Landrieu (D-LA) Lott (R-MS) Lugar (R-IN) Martinez (R-FL) McCain (R-AZ) McConnell (R-KY) Murkowski (R-AK) Nelson (D-NE) Roberts (R-KS) Santorum (R-PA) Sessions (R-AL) Shelby (R-AL) Smith (R-OR) Specter (R-PA) Stevens (R-AK) Sununu (R-NH) Talent (R-MO) Thomas (R-WY) Thune (R-SD) Vitter (R-LA) Voinovich (R-OH) Warner (R-VA)
NAYs ---47 Akaka (D-HI) Baucus (D-MT) Bayh (D-IN) Biden (D-DE) Bingaman (D-NM) Boxer (D-CA) Byrd (D-WV) Cantwell (D-WA) Carper (D-DE) Chafee (R-RI) Clinton (D-NY) Coleman (R-MN) Collins (R-ME) Conrad (D-ND) Dayton (D-MN) DeWine (R-OH) Dodd (D-CT) Dorgan (D-ND) Durbin (D-IL) Feingold (D-WI) Feinstein (D-CA) Harkin (D-IA) Inouye (D-HI) Jeffords (I-VT) Johnson (D-SD) Kennedy (D-MA) Kerry (D-MA) Kohl (D-WI) Lautenberg (D-NJ) Leahy (D-VT) Levin (D-MI) Lieberman (D-CT) Lincoln (D-AR) Mikulski (D-MD) Murray (D-WA) Nelson (D-FL) Obama (D-IL) Pryor (D-AR) Reed (D-RI) Reid (D-NV) Rockefeller (D-WV) Salazar (D-CO) Sarbanes (D-MD) Schumer (D-NY) Snowe (R-ME) Stabenow (D-MI) Wyden (D-OR) Not Voting - 1 Corzine (D-NJ)
84
posted on
11/03/2005 4:15:30 PM PST
by
HHKrepublican_2
(you cant spell liberal without an L an I and an E...If the first ammendment doesnt work, use the 2nd)
To: HHKrepublican_2
Ben Nelson voted yes?! Can we count on him to help with the Alito nomination?
85
posted on
11/03/2005 4:22:49 PM PST
by
rockthecasbah
(Today is the greatest day I've ever known. Can't wait for tomorrow.)
To: HHKrepublican_2
Read the whole article. It isn't as 'conservative' as you might hope. Bush still wants to pay off insurance companies:
the White House has threatened to veto the bill over an obscure proposal to kill subsidies for some regional health insurers that offered Medicare prescription drug coverage.
86
posted on
11/03/2005 4:23:59 PM PST
by
TomGuy
To: byteback
What's up with Coleman? Coleman didn't like some of the entitlement cuts and does not favor drilling in ANWR. He heard from me the first time he did this and he is about to hear from me again. I'm very disappointed in him.
87
posted on
11/03/2005 4:25:25 PM PST
by
Colonel_Flagg
(Inertia. It's not just for breakfast any more.)
To: 308MBR
Coleman, DeWine, Snowe and Chafee are the RINOs.
Ben Nelson was the lone Dem vote in favor.
88
posted on
11/03/2005 4:26:05 PM PST
by
rockthecasbah
(Today is the greatest day I've ever known. Can't wait for tomorrow.)
To: HHKrepublican_2
This is crap. Read the whole article.
"The Senate bill is estimated to trim $36 billion, or 2 percent, from budget deficits forecast at $1.6 trillion over five years. The cuts total $6 billion for the plan's first year, with deficits predicted to exceed $300 billion."
"The bill contains about $35 billion in new spending to go along with the cuts:"
89
posted on
11/03/2005 4:28:00 PM PST
by
Axhandle
To: rockthecasbah
He's a red state RAT.
He has to pretend to be quasi-conservative.
To: TomGuy
How about this gem:
"It passed after the Senate rejected, 68-31, a bid by conservatives to make much of the aid available through school vouchers."
GOP Senators in favor of vouchers = only 31?? :-(
To: gaijin
They're starting to sound like conservatives, or something.It's a trick . . . .
92
posted on
11/03/2005 4:32:06 PM PST
by
p23185
To: TomGuy
I think if he gets ANWR out of the deal, Bush will not veto at all no matter what.
93
posted on
11/03/2005 4:39:09 PM PST
by
rwfromkansas
(http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
To: Axhandle
"The bill contains about $35 billion in new spending to go along with the cuts:"
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAH...OH...HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH...WHEW...HAHA
To: HHKrepublican_2
It's a
95
posted on
11/03/2005 4:42:56 PM PST
by
manwiththehands
(Big Lie #1: "Islam is a peaceful religion"; Big Lie #2: Bush "lied")
To: HHKrepublican_2
It's over 5 years I think. Big woop, but I must admit it's a (baby)step.
96
posted on
11/03/2005 4:55:40 PM PST
by
Mister Baredog
((Conservatives don't want judicial "litmus tests", unless THEY supply the test that is))
To: nicmarlo
It's now up to the RINOS in the house to defeat it. Without Delay, they just might do just that.
97
posted on
11/03/2005 4:56:57 PM PST
by
Mister Baredog
((Conservatives don't want judicial "litmus tests", unless THEY supply the test that is))
To: HHKrepublican_2
The spending battle now heads to the House, where Republicans are divided over whether to cut more deeply across a broader range of social programs. The spending battle now heads to the House, where Republicans are divided over whether to cut more deeply across a broader range of social programs
Yea, I would stutter on that statement too! ; )
98
posted on
11/03/2005 4:59:51 PM PST
by
EGPWS
To: Mister Baredog
99
posted on
11/03/2005 5:00:38 PM PST
by
nicmarlo
To: manwiththehands
It's a [bone]Now, now...one must feed!
Your post shows an "if it's bad, it's bad and if it's good it's bad" attitude.
One can enjoy life and tolerate politics at the same time.
100
posted on
11/03/2005 5:04:16 PM PST
by
EGPWS
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 221-240 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson