Skip to comments.
Bush: Judge Samuel Alito is new choice for Supreme Court nominee
Fox News ^
Posted on 10/31/2005 3:12:28 AM PST by kcvl
Per Fox News...
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: alito; antoninscalia; billofrights; bush; catholic; civilrights; constitution; courts; judge; judges; judicialrestraint; justice; miers; newjersey; originalintent; presidentbush; rights; scalito; scotus; supremecourt; uusconstitution; whiningdems
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 601-620, 621-640, 641-660 ... 1,901-1,920 next last
To: tiredoflaundry
LOL. Good morning tiredoflaundry...great graphic as usual ;o)
621
posted on
10/31/2005 5:05:57 AM PST
by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life.)
To: Erik Latranyi
The way they have been elected, it might seem that it would be in their best interests to vote nay.
622
posted on
10/31/2005 5:05:58 AM PST
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: cantfindagoodscreenname
Beautiful family. Can't hurt at all.
623
posted on
10/31/2005 5:05:59 AM PST
by
Republican Red
(''Van der Sloot" is Dutch for ''Kennedy.")
To: SpringheelJack
There it was ... the librarian-wife-crony connection. HAHAHA
624
posted on
10/31/2005 5:06:17 AM PST
by
Bulldaddy
("Vote for me and all your wildest dreams will come true" - Pedro Sanchez)
Thank you, Mr. President.
625
posted on
10/31/2005 5:06:30 AM PST
by
Michael Goldsberry
(an enemy of islam -- Joe Boucher; Leapfrog; Dr.Zoidberg; Lazamataz; ...)
To: SpringheelJack
To: bill1952
What's up with Mass then? The problem with Mass is it is hopelessly gerrymandered and controlled by the public unions.
627
posted on
10/31/2005 5:07:27 AM PST
by
rhombus
To: Arthur Wildfire! March
There is something that bugs me about this choice. It's almost as if saying that Bush can't get a woman past conservatives, a subtle smack at us, who have mostly been pulling for Janice Rogers Brown. I'm not surprised, really. FRegards....Maybe Janice R. Brown had already told the President "no thanks." Nothing to do with the "woman" thing at all.
To: rhombus
At least Bulger isn't running the state house anymore.
To: Republican Red
Very natural speaker. He is talking to his audience not giving a speech.
Impressive
630
posted on
10/31/2005 5:08:32 AM PST
by
Republican Red
(''Van der Sloot" is Dutch for ''Kennedy.")
To: madison10
He might have another choice to make before his term is up.
To: TheForceOfOne
I should like to ask George Bush what he saw in Miers that he didn't see in Alito. This guy seems triple qualified from what I have read so far. Miers was a nobody. Just confirms the charges of crony ism directed at the president
632
posted on
10/31/2005 5:08:40 AM PST
by
ElRushbo
(Harley Riders against Elton John)
To: SpringheelJack
You are wrong.
Roberts was named to replace O'Connor.
Rehnquist died.
A second opening then occurred and Alito will be replacing Rehnquist. Roberts was elevated to Chief Justice and O'Connor agreed to stay on a bit longer is immaterial.
From a conservative's angle, Alito is replacing Rehnquist (2nd nominee, 2nd opening) and Roberts replaced O'Connor (1st nominee, 1st opening).
From a RAT's point of view and the MSM, ALito is replacing O'Connor since it makes the RATs' fight carry a bigger punch.
633
posted on
10/31/2005 5:08:48 AM PST
by
Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
(Bush's #1 priority Africa. #2 priority appease Fox and Mexico . . . USA priority #64.)
To: Republican Red
Sounds like he'll be able to handle Kennedy.
To: alwaysconservative
Krauthammer may not ALWAYS be right, but he sure gave the President and Harriet Miers the rationale for "cover" in her withdrawal. His advice or observation formed the basis of putting right a disastrous situation. His view is the same as my hope: the third pick should be JRB.Nobody believed the Bush spin about why Miers withdrew, so how effective a cover was it? That nomination was going down whether Krauthammer said a word or not.
To: mainepatsfan
Alito is going to school the Senate!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
636
posted on
10/31/2005 5:09:21 AM PST
by
chris1
("Make the other guy die for his country" - George S. Patton)
To: newzjunkey
****He dissented in a Planned Parenthood case against a state law regarding married women had to inform (not get permission from) husbands before obtaining an abortion. SCOTUS eventually sided against his position and for PP.****
"a" Planned Parenthood case?
No offense but it wasn't just any case, it was Casey. Planned Parenthood v Casey 505 U.S. 833 (1992 (the state was Pennsylvania and Casey was the governor).
And yes SCOTUS ruled for PP, but it 5-4 and maybe most important, Rehnquist(?), in his dissenting opinion, quoted Alito almost verbatim (IIRC).
And here's one salient part of Casey (I love reading it)
JUSTICE SCALIA, joined by THE CHIEF JUSTICE, JUSTICE WHITE, and JUSTICE THOMAS, concluded that a woman's decision to abort her unborn child is not a constitutionally protected "liberty," because (1) the Constitution says absolutely nothing about it, and (2) the longstanding traditions of American society have permitted it to be legally proscribed. See, e.g., Ohio v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, 497 U.S. 502, 520 (SCALIA, J., concurring). The Pennsylvania statute should be upheld in its entirety under the rational basis test. Pp. 979-981.
So if anything is to be done about Roe, Casey and Griswold - which started it all with penumbras and emanations - has to be addressed too.
637
posted on
10/31/2005 5:09:30 AM PST
by
Condor51
(Leftists are moral and intellectual parasites - Standing Wolf)
To: chris1
Tanks are the way to go, General.
638
posted on
10/31/2005 5:09:32 AM PST
by
rhombus
To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888; SpringheelJack
Judge Alito just said thank you for nominating me to replace Judge O'Connor.
To: safisoft
Awesome pick! It's a good day.
640
posted on
10/31/2005 5:10:03 AM PST
by
July 4th
(A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 601-620, 621-640, 641-660 ... 1,901-1,920 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson