Skip to comments.
FITZGERALD DOCUMENTS RELEASED
US Dept. of Justice
| oct. 28, 2005
| Patrick Fitzgerald
Posted on 10/28/2005 10:14:53 AM PDT by blogblogginaway
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1028051plame1.html
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cialeak; doj
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-133 next last
To: blogblogginaway
To: Chicos_Bail_Bonds
Ya gotta love The Smoking Gun.
22
posted on
10/28/2005 10:23:58 AM PDT
by
IGOTMINE
(Front Sight. Press. Follow Through. It's a way of life.)
To: okie01
OK, Libby used "Valerie Wilson"
Who told Miller "F/Plame?"
23
posted on
10/28/2005 10:24:24 AM PDT
by
Shermy
To: half-cajun
Just because her status was classified, does not mean she was covert. This is getting ridiculous. What has this guy been doing for 2 years? |
Posting on DU
To: blogblogginaway
Was Wilson or Plame ever questioned under oath about this as to their actions regaring this whole matter?
25
posted on
10/28/2005 10:25:16 AM PDT
by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: Mister Baredog
"Recently Wilson spoke at SF State and was asked by many of the numbskulls there to run for political office. His answer says much about him and our intelligence communitys health. He said hed had, too many wives and taken too many drugs. And, yes. I did inhale. He spoke about being a child of the sixties, being anti-war and the works."-October 24, 2005
http://www.opinioneditorials.com/freedomwriters/rhawkins_20051024.html
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
It's pretty bad when even some of the folks over at DU are going WTF?
27
posted on
10/28/2005 10:26:18 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Drool overflowed my buffer...)
To: Mister Baredog
To: conserv13
The top deputy to the Vice President is charged with perjury and obstruction of justice and thats 'nothing'? They could charge him with murder and it wouldn't be true either.
Look, I take your point: but he's innocent until proven guilty.
To: A CA Guy
Scooter needs to hire a kick ass Lawyer and go after this buffoon! This is pure crap!
How tough would it be to play whackaprosecutor using Fitzpatrick's head as a ball, if you are a top notch lawyer that is?
30
posted on
10/28/2005 10:28:39 AM PDT
by
acapesket
(never had a vote count in all my years here)
To: mykpfsu
Its basically Libby's word against Russert, Cooper and Miller. That seems to be what the documents say.
But what we don't know is if there are other witnesses who have testified to the grand jury that back up the reporters' versions. A whole lot of presidential and vice presidential aides were called before the grand jury. Some of them may have been in the room when Libby was talking on the phone and gave testimony about what he said that differs from Libby's own testimony. Or they may have testified about their conversations with Libby that differ from what Libby told the grand jury. Finally, what if some of the conversations Libby had with reporters and other aides were taped! I imagine that would be some pretty solid evidence should it come to "he said/she said."
31
posted on
10/28/2005 10:28:46 AM PDT
by
drjimmy
To: frogjerk
So Fitz puts something into his document that is both clearly and demonstratably wrong, and has nothing directly to do with the indictment.
Smells like he's covering up not going after Miller for who she was actually covering for.
32
posted on
10/28/2005 10:28:57 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Drool overflowed my buffer...)
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
Posting on DU Effin amazin'....considering the source URL.
33
posted on
10/28/2005 10:29:04 AM PDT
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(If you decide to kick the tiger in the ass...you'd better be prepared to deal with the teeth.)
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
What's that supposed to mean?
To: acapesket
I'm sure there are plenty of great lawyers wanting Libby's case because it would give them immortality in history and of course later their own books on the matter.
35
posted on
10/28/2005 10:30:50 AM PDT
by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: conserv13
They got nothing on the underlying crime. They got an "entrapment" indictment which is a whole different kettle of fish. The Special Counsel had to manufacture a crime to justify the expenditure of several million dollars investigating a non-event.
("Denny Crane: Gun Control? For Communists. She's a liberal. Can't hunt.")
36
posted on
10/28/2005 10:31:19 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: blogblogginaway
Well, we're about to find out if this President and this Administration is willing to fight this fight.
The gauntlet has been thrown down. I have my doubts as to whether they have the will to make a stand. We shall see.
IMHO, this nation's government is at a crossroads.
37
posted on
10/28/2005 10:31:20 AM PDT
by
airborne
(Al-Queda can recruit on college campuses but the US military can't!)
To: TheSane
it's the same charge we got Clinton on.The difference is that Clinton was guilty.
To: Shermy
My money is on that this is gonna plead out.
No way jury wouldn't convict if you have a parade of reporters marching in all with the same story. Plus, they all protected the source until Libby let them off the hook for source secrecy (probably under obstruction charges pressure from Fitz - or bad advice from counsel). Oh, and that's not to mention the paragraph that obviously comes from the VP himself re: when he told Libby that Plame worked CIA in counterproliferation or whatever it was.
By the way, Fitzgerald is squeaky clean, and the other investigators - one is this pencil-neck geek looking guy who seems nice and one or two younger women that also seemed nice. I for one don't believe these were a bunch of hacks and/or operatives running the show.
The old line is you can indict a ham sandwich is apropos here, and that being said, the fact that they did not indict him for more than this is a testament to the prosecutors' evenhandedness, I hate to say it.
In fact, I think faced with the information in that indictment, any one of us who had Fitz's job would have had to indict Libby for this. Remember the standard at indictment stage is Probable Cause. Far far FAR cry from reasonable doubt.
To: acapesket
Rush mentioned Oliver North's attorney, (Brendan Sullivan?).
40
posted on
10/28/2005 10:31:32 AM PDT
by
maggief
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-133 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson