To: mykpfsu
Its basically Libby's word against Russert, Cooper and Miller. That seems to be what the documents say.
But what we don't know is if there are other witnesses who have testified to the grand jury that back up the reporters' versions. A whole lot of presidential and vice presidential aides were called before the grand jury. Some of them may have been in the room when Libby was talking on the phone and gave testimony about what he said that differs from Libby's own testimony. Or they may have testified about their conversations with Libby that differ from what Libby told the grand jury. Finally, what if some of the conversations Libby had with reporters and other aides were taped! I imagine that would be some pretty solid evidence should it come to "he said/she said."
31 posted on
10/28/2005 10:28:46 AM PDT by
drjimmy
To: drjimmy
I'm reading it...some of it sounds like he lied to Cooper.
So what? Legally I mean.
And who is Novak's source no. 1???
50 posted on
10/28/2005 10:36:24 AM PDT by
Shermy
To: drjimmy
But it's still all 'he said, she said'. I think the whole thing is bad farce. Two years - Two Years? - and this is what Fitzgerald came up with?
59 posted on
10/28/2005 10:39:56 AM PDT by
Rummyfan
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson