Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN: HARRIET MIERS HAS WITHDRAWN!

Posted on 10/27/2005 5:54:48 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper

just breaking!!!!!!!!


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 0; 00000000000000000000; 00000nosantorum; 000sorryfirstkeyword; 0notsofast1stkeyword; 0real1stkeyword; 1firstkeyword; alangreenspan; alito; alltogethernow; angieharmon; borked; botsuicidewatch; bradpitt; brown; bushsquagmier; dealwithit; edithbrownclement; faves; fredthompson; harrietemiers; harrietmiers; harrietthemere; hightechlynching; humphreybogart; janicerbrown; janicerogersbrown; jellopudding; jrb; judgeclement; judicialnominees; luttig; marklevinforscotus; miers; noloyaltytopresident; noricksantorum; rightsviolated; rino; sadday; santorumdogcatcher08; scotus; snugasabuginarug; sorrybushbots; spinelessrinos; stupidsenatetricks; traitorrepubs; unjustandunfair; victory; withdrawal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 3,421-3,436 next last
To: areafiftyone
Do they really think that the Dems are going to let a true conservative judge go thru? If they are giving Miers a hard time what will they do to any of the real conservative judges? They will slam them left and right. We won't get anyone thru that way. In a way, the Dems have won.

First off, I don't want a "conservative" judge - I want an originalist. A "conservative" would just be opposite Ms Ginsburg - an activist for the right. I want someone like Scalia & Thomas!

Second, let's say he nominates JRB or a Federalist society judge. Let's let the nominee state their beliefs & positions! Let's get the Dems on record AGAINST those positions! Let's let the media LOSE THIS WAR on ideals! I have no doubt with the new media we have these days that an originalist such as Thomas CAN and WILL get on the Supreme Court.

my 2 cents...

361 posted on 10/27/2005 6:15:41 AM PDT by mosquitobite (What we permit; we promote. ~ Mark Sanford for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

I've got my war paint on. Let's rumble. We've got your back, Mr. President.


362 posted on 10/27/2005 6:15:41 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

An "up or down vote" refers only to the procedure in the Sentate, NOT public debate, which is protected by the First Amendment. The problem in the Senate is that a group of minority Senators use a procedural tactic to prevent the majority from voting. This has nothing to do with our right to voice our opinions! I can't believe how many people on FR are making this mistake.


363 posted on 10/27/2005 6:15:45 AM PDT by born in the Bronx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: cwiz24

If Bush thinks she would be a good judge, he can still nominate her to a district or circuit court. Not likely, though.


364 posted on 10/27/2005 6:15:54 AM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
I like JRB, but I would go with this fellow too. He looks damn good in a robe.

Image hosted by Photobucket.com

365 posted on 10/27/2005 6:15:54 AM PDT by mware (Keeper of the I's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: livius

Thanks for that posting, Chicken little.


366 posted on 10/27/2005 6:15:55 AM PDT by Homer1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: livius

So what's more important...Bush's short-term political considerations, or the next 20+ years of the Supreme Court?


367 posted on 10/27/2005 6:16:03 AM PDT by Sometimes A River (Serving on a Meals-on-Wheels program is NOT a qualification for a SC nominee. Call your Senators!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: livius

Well, there should be a bunch on happy people on this board today.


368 posted on 10/27/2005 6:16:05 AM PDT by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
And now all the Miers haters are gearing up to do the same to the next person the President nominates.

One has to assume by the tone of your post you were a Miers supporter. There may be some opposition to the next candidate, even Roberts had his share ... but it's unlikely to be anywhere near the opposition the Miers nomination brought about ... which frankly had more to do with Bush's boneheaded choice of her, rather than Miers herself.

369 posted on 10/27/2005 6:16:17 AM PDT by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere

She was not the most qualified person to serve on the court and it would be hard for anyone here to make that case. Shame on Bush for not throwing a heavyweight into the ring and giving republicans an opportunity to have big victory.


370 posted on 10/27/2005 6:16:17 AM PDT by misterrob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

Can't you just accept that people, even presidents make mistakes? The nomination was a mistake and nobody has to hate the president to realize it.

Who knows, we may just get a conservative judge WITH a track record. Horror of horrors... LOL


371 posted on 10/27/2005 6:16:23 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard

Mulligan


372 posted on 10/27/2005 6:16:28 AM PDT by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GOP
The quagmire in Iraq,... Who's playbook are you quoting?
373 posted on 10/27/2005 6:16:36 AM PDT by Ramcat (Thank You American Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Who's Harriet Miers?


374 posted on 10/27/2005 6:16:51 AM PDT by Fintan (If this tagline lasts longer than 4 hours, please consult a physician.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TitanicMan2003

I agree, i think it is a shame that Miers was bashed before anyone even found anything about her. I think Miers probably would have been fine, but to many things against her. Time to move on. In a year from now we won't even remember the name of Harriet Miers.


375 posted on 10/27/2005 6:16:52 AM PDT by Halls (TEXANS - VOTE NOV 8TH FOR PROPOSITION 2 - THE MARRIAGE PROTECTION AMENDMENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: All

Wow...I was pretty close on the date/time prediction thread.
I had said 1PM today.


376 posted on 10/27/2005 6:16:54 AM PDT by duffthor (GO BIG RED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
I have thought Miers nomination was a flawed choice from the start. I am glad to see Bush get a second chance on this one.

Agreed; and I will be in fervent prayer that he makes a wise choice this time around.

377 posted on 10/27/2005 6:16:54 AM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
If your preferences are no one's business but your own why do you post them here?

So strange.

378 posted on 10/27/2005 6:16:57 AM PDT by muawiyah (/ hey coach do I gotta' put in that "/sarcasm " thing again? How'bout a double sarcasm for this one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

"No bull, Bill Frist need to declare all-out nuclear war in the Senate and get something done for a change. lThe Republicans need to grow some cajones and get the job done. If they don't, they will lose the conservative wing of the party."

You got that right. I contributed more than I could really afford to the NRSC in order to give GWB the Senate majority required to confirm SCOTUS justices who actually respect the Constitution.

Got a fundraising call from the RNC two days ago. I told them no more bucks unless and until a qualified conservative justice is nominated and confirmed.


379 posted on 10/27/2005 6:17:00 AM PDT by mondonico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: Lizarde
Rove is brilliant - appoint a crappy nominee and withdraw it just as the GJ comes to an end - loving every minute of this LOL

What's frustrating about this "stategery" is that we will never know for sure. So many here are convinced that Bush is just a limp-wristed liberal dope (replace liberal with conservative and it sounds like a democrat, eh?). But maybe, he actually was distracted by the war on terror, and actually did put it as his number one priority just as he promissed. We shall see.

380 posted on 10/27/2005 6:17:05 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 3,421-3,436 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson