Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Woman Sees Husband Off to Iraq, Gets Fired
AP ^ | 10/26/5

Posted on 10/26/2005 3:40:21 PM PDT by SmithL

Caledonia, Mich. -- A woman who took an unpaid leave of absence from work to see her husband off to war with an Indiana National Guard unit has been fired after failing to show up for her part-time receptionist job the day following his departure.

"It was a shock," said Suzette Boler, a 40-year-old mother of three and grandmother of three. "I was hurt. I felt abandoned by people I thought cared for me. I sat down on the floor and cried for probably two hours."

Officials at her former workplace, Benefit Management Administrators Inc., a Caledonia employee-benefits company, confirmed that Boler was dismissed when she didn't report to work the day after she said goodbye to her husband of 22 years.

"We gave her sufficient time to get back to work," Clark Galloway, vice president of operations for Benefit Management, told The Grand Rapids Press for a story Wednesday.

He added that other factors were involved in the decision, but he declined to elaborate.

On Oct. 16, Boler went with her husband, Army Spc. Jerry Boler, 45, to an Indianapolis-area airfield, where he and others in his National Guard unit gathered to be transported to Fort Dix, N.J. The unit will soon be deployed to Iraq, where he will help guard convoys from insurgent attacks.

Although the Bolers moved to western Michigan 14 years ago, Jerry Boler, a diesel mechanic, decided to remain with his Bloomington, Ind.-based Guard unit, the 150th Field Artillery Regiment.

Suzette Boler had received permission to take off work the week leading up to her husband's departure. As a part-time employee at Benefit Management, she did not receive vacation pay and was not compensated for her time off.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: awolatwork; donttakebait; excusesexcuses; gotaweekoff; nationalguard; nonbenefits; noshow; readthearticle; whiner
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 next last
To: SmithL
Suzette Boler had received permission to take off work the week leading up to her husband's departure.

She was off for a week, with their blessing. She didn't return the day after her husband left, when I'm assuming they were expecting her back.

Maybe she was still not back in town and could not return the day after he left, but it sounds like she didn't communicate her intentions very well and left them in the lurch.

I am supportive of our troops and supportive and sympathetic to their families left at home. But this wasn't a lack of support by the company issue. She was given a full week off and then didn't return on time.

Could be she pushed her luck a little too far.

61 posted on 10/26/2005 5:04:30 PM PDT by HairOfTheDog (Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: podkane

Yeah, in blue Michigan they fired her...


62 posted on 10/26/2005 5:04:51 PM PDT by faithincowboys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #63 Removed by Moderator

To: Bommer

There is no justifiable reason to start spamming this company.


64 posted on 10/26/2005 5:07:04 PM PDT by HairOfTheDog (Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: babyface00
She took the week off that her husband was leaving. She was supposed to have returned on the 17th, the day after he left. She decided to stay home and go in on the 18th. She was fired on the 17th.

Why didn't she just call in on the 17th and let them know she wasn't coming in? At least she'd have had a chance to be told that she SHOULD come in or risk losing the job.

65 posted on 10/26/2005 5:07:56 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: D.P.Roberts

Apparently, it's a difficult concept to grasp.


66 posted on 10/26/2005 5:10:39 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Let's think of the other side here, shall we?

Yes, it's heartbreaking to hear she was terminated after leaving to see her husband off.

However, I have fired several employees over the years who've had even more heartbreaking reasons they missed their last day of work. Family emergencies, deaths, you name it.

But the one thing they all had in common was that they'd burned all sick time, vacation time and personal time early in the year - generally for "unscheduled vacation" (that is, calling in sick to stay at home and watch Jerry Springer) or because they were too hung over to come to work.

They then found themselves in a disciplinary status during each subsequent, post-exhausting of benefit leave (vacation, sick, personal) absence.

Once they'd reached a level of absenteeism, they removed my option to NOT terminate them. Yes, it's sad to see someone lose their job. No doubt about that.

But I've never fired someone who didn't cause the condition that resulted in their termination.

There's nothing I hate more than to fire someone for attendance issues.

67 posted on 10/26/2005 5:10:53 PM PDT by AlaninSA (It's ONE NATION UNDER GOD...brought to you by the Knights of Columbus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

This is not passing the smell test at this time; awaiting additional info


68 posted on 10/26/2005 5:12:29 PM PDT by kublia khan (Absolute war brings total victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OSHA

That's my reading of it as well, but there's definitely more than what's here.


69 posted on 10/26/2005 5:12:49 PM PDT by July 4th (A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dinok

Never been in management, eh?


70 posted on 10/26/2005 5:16:09 PM PDT by dakine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dakine

He sounds like an international class-warrior.


71 posted on 10/26/2005 5:16:56 PM PDT by Triggerhippie (Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
He added that other factors were involved in the decision, but he declined to elaborate.

She had evidently agreed to return to work after he left. It says she "failed to return"...

Sometimes "is" is...

72 posted on 10/26/2005 5:20:03 PM PDT by pageonetoo (You'll spot their posts soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

28 years a Navy Wife....said farewell to hubby numerous times. Requested time off...got it...returned to work on the day I promised. Never tried to take advantage of my employer. Never treated badly by my employer.

I believe there's something more to this story.

Sue in Virginia



73 posted on 10/26/2005 5:20:22 PM PDT by WSue601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
The story says nothing about her work habits or past behavior. I don't know enough to judge.
74 posted on 10/26/2005 5:20:25 PM PDT by TankerKC (Done with the NFL..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

Looks like you're not content to jump to one conclusion.


75 posted on 10/26/2005 5:22:03 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Seems like some accommodation could have been made for a "part-time" employee.

They accomodated her a week's worth. She didn't show up after he shipped out. How long were they supposed to wait for her to decide she wanted to show back up.

76 posted on 10/26/2005 5:24:00 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog

Some of the excerpted part suggests that it is a he said/she said situation. She admits that she got back in town the night before she was expected to show up.

------

"She usually worked Mondays, Tuesdays and Wednesdays....Boler recalled being asked, not ordered, to start back at her job Oct. 17, the day after her husband left. She told her bosses that she would try to return that day but if she could not, she would definitely be back Oct. 18, she said.

When Boler returned home from Indiana on the night of Oct. 16, a few hours after leaving her husband at the airfield, she said she felt drained by the emotional ordeal and decided to return to work Oct. 18.

But on the afternoon of Oct. 17, she received a call from work telling her to come in the following day and get her things because she was being fired."

------

So apparently she didn't call in Monday telling them that she wouldn't be coming in.


77 posted on 10/26/2005 5:27:19 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat (SonofaBuckner Qualls and Lidge, king and queen of Choke City, USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: WSue601

Thanks Sue. I don't like to see a story like this. I understand the support for the woman, but the employer may be very patriotic. We just don't know. All the best to you and your family. Thanks for the service.


78 posted on 10/26/2005 5:27:23 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: babyface00

Or at least she should have called in and asked for another day off.

It is easy to get rid of a part time employee...just tell them you don't need them anymore.


79 posted on 10/26/2005 5:27:24 PM PDT by cajun-jack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Moral Hazard
What it presumably comes down to is whether she in fact did tell them beforehand she would probably take the 17th off, and whether they understood that as meaning she wouldn't need to call them and let them know that day.

This statement is key: "He added that other factors were involved in the decision, but he declined to elaborate." Seems to me that her employer was looking for a reason to fire her because she was a problem employee. She may have had a long history of unreliability, inexcusable absences, attitude. etc. Good employees are hard to find and I doubt the employer would have fired her over something like this if it was a first-time occurance for an otherwise good employee.

80 posted on 10/26/2005 5:28:04 PM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson