Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fitzerald Indictments : Post Your Predictions Here
10/26/2005 | Myself

Posted on 10/26/2005 8:24:41 AM PDT by SirLinksalot

Okay folks, as Tom Mcguire said, better to be wrong than gutless.

I am posting my predictions regarding who and who will not be indicted here ....

Last night there was a little "Rove rally" at TradeSports.com

The futures market odds of a Rove indictment fell to about 45%. Poor Scooter Libby's was holding tough at around an 80% probability of indictment.

As of this writing, Rove's probability shot up to 60$ and Libby's never fell below 75%.

I predict that Rove will NOT BE INDICTED for the simple reason that it is extremely difficult to prove that he :

1) Leaked classified info. 2) Broke the 1982 or 1917 laws; or 3) Engaged in a conspiracy to out Plame.

Most of the testimony from Rove were in the order of -- "If I remember correctly", or "if memory serves me right..." -- hardly grounds for accusations.

Scooter Libby is another matter. There is evidence ( however little it is ) to show that this man actually got info from the CIA and KNEW about Plame's status and did reveal classified info to reporters.

He will be indicted.

NOTE, I am not talkign about what SHOULD happen in the real world, but what will happen in an imperfect world (such as we have ).

In a perfect world, Joe Wilson should be the focus of investigation and so should individuals within the CIA.

Anyone who wants to back my prediction should SELL Rove now ( if you own them ). It will head to zero as soon as indictments are handed out.

And if you agree with me, you should buy Libby now and bring home the difference when the contract rises from the 70's to 100 ( end of investigation ) for a decent profit.

CAVEAT : I don't endorse gambling. The whole thing is for pure fun.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: cialeak; fitzerald; plame
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-256 next last

1 posted on 10/26/2005 8:24:41 AM PDT by SirLinksalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

Scooter maybe

Rove no


2 posted on 10/26/2005 8:26:01 AM PDT by TXBSAFH (The GOP needs to be made to toe the conservative line, not the other way around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

I'm going for a long shot:

Wilson and / or Plame are in the mix.


3 posted on 10/26/2005 8:26:16 AM PDT by nuffsenuff (Don't get stuck on Stupid - General Russ Honore Sept 21, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

I predict 2 indictments.


4 posted on 10/26/2005 8:26:51 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

WILSON, MILLER and the former CIA director........


5 posted on 10/26/2005 8:27:05 AM PDT by Red Badger (In life, you don't get what you deserve. You get what you settle for...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

NYT's is smearing Miller. Must be someone not in the Bush Admin. My take.


6 posted on 10/26/2005 8:27:18 AM PDT by jw777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

No indictments. Period.


7 posted on 10/26/2005 8:27:21 AM PDT by brivette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: SirLinksalot
I pretty much agree with you.

Libby gets indicted, then acquitted.

Rove doesn't gets indicted.
9 posted on 10/26/2005 8:27:24 AM PDT by RWR8189 (George Allen 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

I predict I am ordering a Cripsy Strips Meal at KFC - and will eat the said meal. The KFC in the town I work in is closing :(


10 posted on 10/26/2005 8:27:28 AM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
Goes for Scooter because he can't nail Rove. Scooter will be found not guilty.
11 posted on 10/26/2005 8:27:29 AM PDT by ReaganRevolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot; the Real fifi; frankjr

Libby - no bill sought, too hard

Rove - no bill sought, too hard

Wilson - one count perjury
one count, conspiracy to obstruct justice

plame - one count, conspiracy to obstruct justice
one count, hatch act


12 posted on 10/26/2005 8:27:46 AM PDT by Perdogg ("Facts are stupid things." - President Ronald Wilson Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

Joe Wilson.


13 posted on 10/26/2005 8:27:49 AM PDT by tdewey10 (It's time for the party to return to the principles of President Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
This is going to be the Martha Stewart thing. Nobody indicted for leaking information. Rove indicted for giving false information. They'll never prove it... but that's irrelevant. They just want something to do.
14 posted on 10/26/2005 8:27:56 AM PDT by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuffsenuff

Wilson and Plame indicted for espionage. Scooter Libby and Karl Rove nominated for Congressional Medal of Freedom.


15 posted on 10/26/2005 8:28:01 AM PDT by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

Libby and Miller


16 posted on 10/26/2005 8:28:03 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Fitzgerald is doing entirely too much "outside work" this week to have this thing wrapped up.

Somethings not right.


17 posted on 10/26/2005 8:28:33 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

You're dreaming but I like your dreams and it makes the most sense.


18 posted on 10/26/2005 8:28:58 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

I think Sacco and Vanzetti are in a lot of trouble./scar


19 posted on 10/26/2005 8:29:02 AM PDT by RexBeach ("The rest of the world is three drinks behind." -Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
Here's a prediction that I posted earlier . . .

My prediction is that nobody is going to be indicted, even if the prosecutor thinks he can make a good case that some kind of crime had been committed.

Because of the role that the CIA played in this case, it would be impossible for any defendant to mount a defense without forcing the disclosure of top-secret information and/or the potential exposure of additional CIA personnel. This inherent dilemma would likely result in a judge throwing out the charges in a criminal court down the road.

If someone were indicted in this case and they went to trial, their defense lawyer would submit a list of witnesses that included a lot of CIA personnel -- possibly covert. He could also subpoena all kinds of CIA information that would be considered classified. Once the CIA determines that none of this information could be shared with the court due to "national security concerns," the case would have to be thrown out of court because someone accused of a crime cannot be put in a position where he can't mount a legitimate defense.

20 posted on 10/26/2005 8:29:09 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but Lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-256 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson