Not to mention hysterical.
Posted on 10/03/2005 4:06:25 AM PDT by johnmecainrino
Harriet Miers
http://newsmeat.com/washington_political_donations/Harriet_Miers.php
No, there is no confusion.
She loves to contibute to pro-abort politicians.
Date of birth: August 10, 1945..... Still....young for an attorney....
I am neutral on her selection at this time...be patient....no need to jump off a cliff.
I simply want a justice to follow our wonderful God sent Constitution.
It is true. Disgusting!
Not to mention hysterical.
Roe v. Wade is safe and sound with the pick of Miers.
Bush is a liar (she's not in the Scalia/Thomas mold) and a failure.
Yeah, that makes no sense.
Well, hopefully it's a headfake. Guess we'll know very shortly.
Depressing. No backbone to nominate Brown.
i found this
MIERS, HARRIET
DALLAS,TX 75201
LOCKE PURNELL
4/23/1997
$1,000
Hutchison, Kay Bailey
MIERS, HARRIET
DALLAS,TX 75201
LOCKE PURNELL
5/11/1999
$1,000
Hutchison, Kay Bailey
MIERS, HARRIET
DALLAS,TX 75201
LOCKE PURNELL
6/3/1999
$1,000
Hutchison, Kay Bailey
MIERS, HARRIET
DALLAS,TX 75229
ATTORNEY
6/1/2000
$1,000
Newton, Jon
MIERS, HARRIET
DALLAS,TX 75201
LOCKE PURNELL
6/3/1999
($1,000)
Hutchison, Kay Bailey
MIERS, HARRIET E
DALLAS,TX 75201
LOCKE LIDDELL & SAPP
3/10/1999
$1,000
Bush, George W
MIERS, HARRIET E MS
DALLAS,TX 75201
SELF EMPLOYED/ATTORNEY
5/17/2000
$415
Locke, Liddell & Sapp
MIERS, HARRIET MRS
DALLAS,TX 75201
LOCKE LIDDELL & SAPP/ATTORNEY
4/28/2000
$1,000
Bush, George W
MIERS, HARRIETT
DALLAS,TX 75201
LOCKE LIDDELL & SAPP
2/19/1999
$1,000
Republican Party of Dallas County
Turn on your TV and witness the HORROR
She'll get more votes than the more qualified Roberts. The inept Senate will be proud.
What difference does it make if she is a "Republican."
So is Lincoln Chaffey and John McCain.
I am a conservative first, a Republican only so long as the party is conservative.
Is this nominee a conservative?
DONE. FINISHED. **NO** **MORE**.
***
I'm with you! I'm absolutely sick of it.
You watch that senate turn into a bunch of pussy cats. Mark my words.
One more thing: This pick means that the prediction of the New York Times from last week was correct. I'm not sure what that means, but I don't like it.
She is pro-choice and a close friend and lawyer of Bush's family. That's enough.
Sadly, I agree, cyborg. Brown would have been THE choice, if he were wanting another strict Constitutionalist.
Of course I meant to say 'not to be'. I personally don't care whether she's married or not. Hillary was married and she was a horror.
If it was only "a dream". Feels more like a nightmare.
Helluva way to start a Monday.
Maybe if we all go back to bed and try again, we can wake up and hear a "correct" name like: Luttig, Brown or Williams.
What a move of pure idiocy on Dubya's part. He just SINGLE-HANDEDLY assured the Dems of regaining control of the WH, Senate and Congress in the next round of elections. GOOD MOVE, GEORGIE BOY!!
Can ya all say "President Hillary Rodham Clinton"? Cuz it is gonna happen. The millions of Christian Conservatives who got the Repubs in party last time are NOT GOING TO BE FOOLED TWICE - and they will for the most part **ALL* stay home in the '06 and '08 elections.
The Repubs have been on the edge of extinction for some time now, since they don't know how to exercise power when they have it. This officially kills our party, with the final knife through the heart.
"I am neutral on her selection at this time...be patient....no need to jump off a cliff.
I simply want a justice to follow our wonderful God sent Constitution"
wishy washy RINO politics with all the GREAT CONSERVATIVE JUDGES we get THIS?? BUSH SUCKS
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.