Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TomGuy

Hmmm....not sure what I think of this. I think I'd prefer Scalia be moved up. Should be interesting.


3 posted on 09/05/2005 4:40:54 AM PDT by tsmith130
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: tsmith130

I've not been impressed with what I've seen of Roberts so far, but we'll see I suppose...Scalia would have been a better choice...


5 posted on 09/05/2005 4:41:43 AM PDT by College Repub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: tsmith130

You pick your fights wisely..


55 posted on 09/05/2005 5:04:09 AM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: tsmith130
Again, from what Justice Thomas told me and my students in a LONG talk in February, the CJ is purely symbolic. The decision process, he said, was remarkably quick: even on the most divisive cases, it took 15 minutes for the justices to all state their opinion and vote. He said there is no jawboning, buttonholing, or Hollywood theatrics where people try to "persuade" others in the hallway. Their opinions are set when they have a meeting about a case. So CJ is really just the person who calls the meeting to order and nothing else.
110 posted on 09/05/2005 5:19:58 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: tsmith130
Hmmm....not sure what I think of this. I think I'd prefer Scalia be moved up. Should be interesting.

I thought that was going to happen as well. I'm sure the Justices will uphold the utmost professionalism, but I wonder if deep down, Scalia was hping. Would have been interesting if he picked, Thomas also.

134 posted on 09/05/2005 5:31:04 AM PDT by RepubMommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: tsmith130

I heard a 2001 Rehnquist interview on CSPAN, yesterday. He explained that often the other Supreme Court Justices are not nominated because of the fear that it would cause animosity amongst the justices...feeling that they should have been there instead.


197 posted on 09/05/2005 6:00:41 AM PDT by Sensei Ern (Christian, Comedian, Husband,Opa, Dog Owner, former Cat Co-dweller, and all around good guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: tsmith130

I prefer Scalia, but I imagine he just wants to avoid an additional fight. Still, I think CJ should have high court exerience (ruling experience).


274 posted on 09/05/2005 6:49:20 AM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (The repenting soul is the victorious soul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: tsmith130
The President is a genius! He appointed Roberts to be CJ replacing Rehnquist, thus keeping Sandra in until someone replaces her.

The court remains with 9 members.

As I said above, "The President is a genius!"
339 posted on 09/05/2005 8:26:50 AM PDT by GOPologist ("On some days you may feel like a dog; on other days you may feel like a hydrant!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: tsmith130

I agree. This certainly isn't based on merit.


492 posted on 09/05/2005 1:47:21 PM PDT by weegee (The lesson from New Orleans? Smart Growth kills. You can't evacuate dense populations easily.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: tsmith130

Ditto, I think Scallia deserved the spot.


493 posted on 09/05/2005 1:48:58 PM PDT by BitDrifter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: tsmith130
I'd prefer Scalia be moved up. Should be interesting.

Scalia or Thomas, IMHO. Either one would give the leftists fits.

512 posted on 09/05/2005 3:42:42 PM PDT by FierceDraka (The Democratic Party - Aiding and Abetting The Enemies of America Since 1968)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: tsmith130
Hmmm....not sure what I think of this. I think I'd prefer Scalia be moved up. Should be interesting.

Me too! Either Justice Scalia or Justice Thomas would be good. I don't know enough about Roberts.

517 posted on 09/05/2005 4:11:12 PM PDT by teletech (Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: tsmith130

As long as Roberts behaves as a bona fide conservative judge, this is a good move. Scalia will probably be more effective as an Associate Judge and Roberts is almost sure to be confirmed. The real replaced for O'Connor now is significant because Roberts replaces a reliable conservative vote on the court.


523 posted on 09/05/2005 5:11:02 PM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: tsmith130

"Hmmm....not sure what I think of this. I think I'd prefer Scalia be moved up. Should be interesting."

My thoughts exactly.


535 posted on 09/06/2005 11:22:27 AM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson