Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hastert: Rebuilding below sea level senseless
AP via WWLTV ^ | 09/01/2005 | AP

Posted on 09/01/2005 2:22:16 PM PDT by zencat

It makes no sense to spend billions of dollars to rebuild a city that's seven feet under sea level, House Speaker Dennis Hastert said of federal assistance for hurricane-devastated New Orleans.

"It looks like a lot of that place could be bulldozed," the Illinois Republican said in an interview Wednesday with The Daily Herald of Arlington, Ill.

(Excerpt) Read more at wwltv.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: katrina; neworleans; uhearditherelst
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 281 next last
To: Conservative Firster

What is the cubic yard capacity of that?


81 posted on 09/01/2005 2:41:57 PM PDT by RightWhale (Load counter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: zencat

Maybe a smaller levee system around the downtown and FQ, while building up the other areas. Lessons from Holland. Redundancy in the pumping systems (i.e. overkill). New Orleans may never be the same, but it will remain and perhaps even flourish more than in the past.


82 posted on 09/01/2005 2:42:02 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syco
This is an incredibly stupid thing for a politician to say right now and it's going to cost Hastert dearly . . .

No, it's not. With every video clip we see of mutants looting in New Orleans, and with every report we hear of helicopter and boat rescue operations shut down due to gunfire from these mutants, more and more Americans are going to realize that having the U.S. government rebuild New Orleans would be worse than having a white farmer buy a grain farm in Zimbabwe.

If this chaos and mayhem continues for another 24 hours, public sentiment for rebuilding New Orleans will be nonexistent. In fact, a majority of Americans outside Louisiana will probably be in favor of bulldozing the city to the ground with any remaining occupants still in it.

83 posted on 09/01/2005 2:42:13 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but Lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

your comments are what he should have said, not tossing around the word "bulldoze" it.


84 posted on 09/01/2005 2:42:32 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Firster

What a stupid place to put a town.


85 posted on 09/01/2005 2:42:42 PM PDT by DeeOhGee (Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: camas

$$$


86 posted on 09/01/2005 2:42:46 PM PDT by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

Assume you were to rebuild somewhere further inland, above sea level, how do you determine who owns what??


87 posted on 09/01/2005 2:43:37 PM PDT by evad ( PC KILLS..and so do liberal judges.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew

redundancy good. ;)


88 posted on 09/01/2005 2:43:51 PM PDT by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Aren't the many residents of suburban NO already living there??


89 posted on 09/01/2005 2:43:52 PM PDT by RockinRight (What part of ILLEGAL immigration do they not understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

A few million cubic yards of gravel will quiet the riot considerably.


90 posted on 09/01/2005 2:44:04 PM PDT by RightWhale (Load counter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
With this plan, you can salvage the French Quarter as a tourist destination

I have to say that the French Quarter was lamer than I thought it would be.

Certain parts of it were quaint and picturesque, but about two-thirds of it were dedicated to selling low-quality Chinese-made trinkets available in pretty much every other city, or to selling massive amounts of identical-tasting Hurricane cocktails or to homo garbage.

I remember wondering, why are there not twice as many restaurants here? The existing ones are so good and the lines are so long - surely an original new venue would be more lucrative than a t-shirt shop!

I assumed the bribery cost of setting up a real business was prohibitive.

91 posted on 09/01/2005 2:44:09 PM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave troops and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

While I am personally not in favor of rebuilding much of NO without consideration of better alternatives for the city and its people, there were certainly more sensitive ways to voice this. I doubt Hastert needed to discuss the subject at all at this time. Professional politicians should know better than to wield words like a baseball bat during a period of crisis.


92 posted on 09/01/2005 2:44:29 PM PDT by Route66 (America's Main Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fooman
Ping me when a hurricane hits Chicago.
93 posted on 09/01/2005 2:44:34 PM PDT by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DeeOhGee

"What a stupid place to put a town."

The French put it there. What more can I say?


94 posted on 09/01/2005 2:44:49 PM PDT by HuronMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: fooman
I guess the whole country moves to kansas.

Ah-oh. Time for Kansas to develop a sane and ration immigration policy, put up a defensible barrier to protect it's borders, train and deploy a security force...

95 posted on 09/01/2005 2:44:55 PM PDT by delacoert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: browardchad
I once knew a guy who worked for one of the major national casino companies. At the time I knew him, they were looking to close down their New Orleans location because they couldn't make a profit in a place that was so corrupt and expensive to do business.

Just think about how ludicrous that is . . . a freaking gambling racket that can't make a profit.

96 posted on 09/01/2005 2:45:06 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but Lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden

If Bob Livingston did not have his zipper problem after Gingrich stepped down... and was Speaker of the House right now... we'd be looking at a 100 billion + rebuilding project ... I'm sure Denny Hastert will come around after some Chicago construction firms are promised a piece of the action.


97 posted on 09/01/2005 2:45:41 PM PDT by Uncle Joe Cannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: evad
how do you determine who owns what??

Actually an excellent question. Those that have clear title on record would be all set.

98 posted on 09/01/2005 2:46:01 PM PDT by RightWhale (Load counter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: zencat

He's got a point (unpopular though it will be in some quarters). Especially in areas that were *completely* destroyed (necessitating building from scratch anyway) or that have little or no historical significance, the re-building should either be (a) relocated to an area which is above sea level, or (b) built on top of several feet of fill, bringing it up to or above sea level.

Perhaps the fill idea (b) is impractical since the ground below is so saturated, I don't know. But building in exactly the same places at the same level is just asking for another disaster, whether it's in ten years or fifty.


99 posted on 09/01/2005 2:46:17 PM PDT by Hetty_Fauxvert (Kelo must GO!! ..... http://sonoma-moderate.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bahblahbah

there was a big fire and issues with chicago river. NO feds funds for that stuff.

I just think we some balance, we were bailed out here in NYC, which could rightly be called a terrorist zone.


100 posted on 09/01/2005 2:46:24 PM PDT by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 281 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson