Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Baby yanked from couple for kisses on belly button
WorldNetDaily ^ | 07/27/2005 | WorldNetDaily.com

Posted on 07/27/2005 4:11:22 PM PDT by WaveMan

The ordeal is finally over, but for the past year, a North Carolina family has been torn apart after state officials claimed family photos of a father kissing his baby's belly button were some kind of child abuse.

It began when Teresa Hamaty took impromptu party snapshots of her husband, Charbel, playfully embracing their naked, newborn son, Kristoff.

After dropping the film off at an Eckerd store in North Raleigh, authorities were notified.

"You see the back of the baby, and like if someone is kissing the baby's belly button," Teresa told WRAL-TV.

But police saw the worst and arrested Teresa for taking sexually explicit photos, charged her husband with felony sexual assault, and put Kristoff and his half-sister in protective custody.

"It was a nightmare," Charbel said, after spending half a year in jail.

Teresa took months fighting to gain back custody of her children.

"I think this was one of those times that they got the wrong people," Teresa said. "They were too quick to judge when they took one look at my husband."

Dozens of Hamaty supporters showed up for court appearances, claiming police overreacted. They raised some $140,000 in legal and living expenses for the Hamatys.

"[It] makes me feel, that's it – that's why I have to be strong for – to show everybody what the truth is," Charbel told the station.

The charges eventually were dropped when a report submitted by an expert said there was no criminal intent in the pictures.

"I hate cameras," Charbel now says. "I don't like taking pictures."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: abuse; childabuse; cps; dhhs; dshs; dss; gayagenda; innocentplay; nodignity; pedophileintraining; pervertparents; photo; photography; sexualassault; stupidparents; uptightfreepsfoad
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 next last
To: headstamp; usafsk
Nope. They are different chains, companies. See www.eckerd.com and www.cvs.com for details.

Correct, Eckerd stores are all over here in NY. They are a subsidiary of JC Penney Corp.

http://www.investorguide.com/cgi-bin/stockarchives.cgi?date=110404

CVS Corporation, a leader in the retail drugstore industry, reported lower third quarter profits, saying the acquisition of rival Eckerd’s stores and mail order pharmacy business were to blame. On July 31, 2004, CVS Corp. acquired 1,268 Eckerd drugstores, as well as Eckerd's pharmacy benefit management and mail order pharmacy business. The company’s earnings were still able to beat most Wall Street estimates. The company reported Thursday it earned $184.6 million, or 44 cents per share, for the period ended Oct. 2, down from $187.8 million, or 46 cents per share, a year ago.

http://catablast.blogspot.com/2005/06/who-are-50-best-analysts-on-wall.html

Feinberg and Jones have seven sites, each about 13,000 square feet in size, listed for lease that were developed to be Eckerd stores. The company's expansion plans came to a halt in 2004 when J.C. Penney Co. Inc. (NYSE: JCP - News) sold the chain.

CVS Corp. (NYSE: CVS - News), based in Rhode Island, and Jean Coutu Group (TSX: PJC.A - News), Canada's second-largest drugstore chain, each bought about half of the chain. However, the deal did not include the eight Eckerd locations in Albuquerque, some of which were just days from opening....

Jones and Feinberg declined to say who the tenants will be for the empty stores until the deals are finalized

101 posted on 07/27/2005 7:56:15 PM PDT by higgmeister (In the shadow of The Big Chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
Here, you practically have to have them on video tape actually having sex with a child AND have the tape validated by an outside source, in addition to an impeccable witness (preferably more than one) and an agreement from the defense attorney to enter a gulity plea (on reduced charges, naturally) to even get them interested in prosecuting real perps.

This is WAY over the top...or really scraping bottom, depending on your point of view.

102 posted on 07/27/2005 8:11:02 PM PDT by sweetliberty (Never argue with a fool. People might not know the difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy
"Should they report something that may or may not be wrong and risk being wrong?"

How about exercising a little common sense....you know, that thing that used to be a virtue, back before being virtuous was politically incorrect.

103 posted on 07/27/2005 8:13:40 PM PDT by sweetliberty (Never argue with a fool. People might not know the difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: calex59

It isn't the police who have this power to throw people into jail. It is DSS, or CPS, or whatever they call it in your state. It is the greatest abuse of government power we have now - even greater in prominence than the "eminent domain" cases that get quite a bit of press.


104 posted on 07/27/2005 8:17:03 PM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Halls
"Shame we live in a world like this that we view a simple playing act with the child as a something wrong and sexual."

Yeah, especially when it is the same world that does its d*mndest to strip away the innocence of children at the earliest available opportunity. It is perfectly okay for kindergarten teachers to expose them to the queer agenda and okay for them to be targeted with sexually explicit marketing schemes and that sexual behavior is none of their parents' business. It's okay to shove its atheistic worldview down their throats and give them a way to avoid accountability for their own actions, but for God's sake...don't kiss their belly buttons because that would be exploiting them. Next it will be reports because a cross or a Bible was spotted in a picture.

105 posted on 07/27/2005 8:26:37 PM PDT by sweetliberty (Never argue with a fool. People might not know the difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: andyk
Whoa, six months in jail without a conviction? I'm missing something here.

This typically happens when a person is not able to post enough money for his bail. In that case you simply stay in jail until your trial. Trials are often as long as six months from the offense, or longer. If you are found not guilty at trial then they let you go.
106 posted on 07/27/2005 8:53:37 PM PDT by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: pax_et_bonum

ping


107 posted on 07/27/2005 9:00:09 PM PDT by sfimom ('Mommy why did they kill her cause she couldn't talk?' (my daughter age8))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: festus
This typically happens when a person is not able to post enough money for his bail.

Nah, something else happened too. If you read the article from when he was first arrested, it says he was bailed with an ankle device. He wasn't in the lockup. Apparently, for some reason, the powers that be decided the guy who worked four jobs to support his family had to go back in the klink sometime after his initial release.

108 posted on 07/27/2005 9:29:12 PM PDT by papertyger (Power concedes nothing without a demand. – Frederick Douglass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Cougar66
"...theres no way to know it was a kiss. Right?"

And no way to know it wasn't.

109 posted on 07/27/2005 10:21:29 PM PDT by sweetliberty (Never argue with a fool. People might not know the difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys
"It isn't the police who have this power to throw people into jail. It is DSS, or CPS, or whatever they call it in your state."

Child Protective Services has no ability to throw anyone in jail. In fact, it is a constant source of frustration for workers that many serious (with plenty of supporting evidence) sex offenders get away with it repepatedly because there is no will to prosecute them if there is no guaranteed win. And this seems to be the norm in many states.

110 posted on 07/27/2005 10:26:53 PM PDT by sweetliberty (Never argue with a fool. People might not know the difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: WaveMan

This is insanity! Has the world gone totally mad?


111 posted on 07/27/2005 11:45:06 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher (The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WaveMan

Erring on the side of caution is best for the baby, so the photo clerk did the right thing, but the investigation phase should've only taken the time to check for priors and to compare the other photos on that roll to the suspicious one.


112 posted on 07/28/2005 12:29:37 AM PDT by skr (Almighty God, thank you for the liberty you have bestowed upon this nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: geezerwheezer

Is this the state that has the signs that say "vehicles in right-turn only lane must turn right?"


113 posted on 07/28/2005 4:08:10 AM PDT by SendShaqtoIraq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: skr

I don't know skr.

I have seen/read far too many horror tales about CPS to trust their judgment. There must be a happy medium, but I don't know what it is. I suppose the real problem is a combination of the failure of common sense, and the corruption of power. Some of these people get far too enthusiastic in their enforcement of these laws.


114 posted on 07/28/2005 4:34:15 AM PDT by WillMalven (It don't matter where you are when "the bomb" goes off, as long as you can say "What was that?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: SendShaqtoIraq

You are correct. They need to tell the locals everything so they will understand.


115 posted on 07/28/2005 5:00:04 AM PDT by geezerwheezer (get up boys, we're burnin' daylight!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Only one problem. There are no more Eckard stores, they are CVS now.

There's got to be dozens of Eckard stores in Pennsylvania, including new construction. We also have a few CVS here and there.

116 posted on 07/28/2005 5:03:52 AM PDT by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Only one problem. There are no more Eckard stores, they are CVS now.

***

Not where I live...they are still Eckerd...well, at least for the moment. :)


117 posted on 07/28/2005 5:18:31 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SendShaqtoIraq

Is this the state that has the signs that say "vehicles in right-turn only lane must turn right?"

***

You laugh, but I have seen signs like that in my state too. Everything nowadays has to be made idiot proof...otherwise, lawsuits!


118 posted on 07/28/2005 5:22:09 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: WaveMan

This story THOROUGHLY pissed me off!
They put this couple through hell and yet will return kids to known abusers again and again.
I hope he SUES Eckerd, the employee, the police, and anyone who even looks at him sideways.
Who among us has never given a "belly zurbit" to a baby?
Their squeal of laughter is just such a delight!
I hope this family can put their lives back together after this awful experience!


119 posted on 07/28/2005 5:25:29 AM PDT by Muzzle_em
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Capriole

That "fat baby" sound they make is just musical, isn't it?
This news story has really touched a nerve with me and I don't even have kids!


120 posted on 07/28/2005 5:32:30 AM PDT by Muzzle_em
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson