Posted on 07/19/2005 4:44:48 PM PDT by freedrudge
Edited on 07/19/2005 4:52:02 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
President Bush has chosen federal appeals court judge John G. Roberts Jr. as his nominee to the Supreme Court, a senior administration official says...
He better walk the walk on this one.
Ben Shapiro doesn't have his law degree yet, otherwise he would be my choice. How old is Mark Levin? He would be awesome too.
:)
Isnt Roberts one of those extremists?
I like the sound of that!!
Hahaha...50 is good enough. If he's healthy (and I'm SURE that was asked of him), he's on for 30-40 good years.
Roberts is much better.
ym opinion too, I believe he wanted Pres. Bush to be able to nominate one at a time. To un-complicate matters.
For myself, I don't give a whit for his "position" on abortion.
All I care about is where he stands on the Constitution of the United States of America and the sanctity of his Oath of Office.
Absolutely not!!!
Bush has liberal tendencies and holding his feet to the fire is the only way move the conservative movement forward. Sniffling cowards like you accomplish nothing.
Be ever vigilant!!! Prepare to raise hell again if there is talk of replacing Renquist with Gonzales!!!!!
"Although, I would have been happy with Ms. Brown"
Or her lovely Daughter,
Doh! showing my age, although the Hermans Hermits predate me a bit.
Good point! I definately want to know too!
I'm VERY happy to be WRONG. I was expecting the worst. I don't mind admiting I was wrong on this deal. WOW
woot!
Roberts: 'We continue to believe that Roe v. Wade was wrongly decided and should be overruled'...
Who cares if they're white? As long as they're conservative, I couldn't give a damn what their race or sex is.
And neither should you.
Very good points, to which I agree.
Let's be clear.
IF, the RATs say Roberts is within the "Judicial Mainstream", it means he is another Souter/O'Connor--a flaming liberal.
IF, the RATs rant and rave and say they will filibuster because Roberts is "outside the judicial mainstream", then we have a good pick.
In that case, Roberts is Borked and we end up with another Ruth Bader Ginsberg.
Regardless, it is impossible today to place a strict Constitutionalist on SCOTUS. We will someday have 9 Marxist interpreters who make new law.
Don't get your hopes up. We will end up with another kissin-cousin of Souter/Ginsberg.
Sum'bit'ch looks like he combs his hair with buttered toast, lying little weasel.
CNN's legal analyst on right now saying that Roberts will be a strong candidate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.