Let's be clear.
IF, the RATs say Roberts is within the "Judicial Mainstream", it means he is another Souter/O'Connor--a flaming liberal.
IF, the RATs rant and rave and say they will filibuster because Roberts is "outside the judicial mainstream", then we have a good pick.
In that case, Roberts is Borked and we end up with another Ruth Bader Ginsberg.
Regardless, it is impossible today to place a strict Constitutionalist on SCOTUS. We will someday have 9 Marxist interpreters who make new law.
Don't get your hopes up. We will end up with another kissin-cousin of Souter/Ginsberg.
"We will someday have 9 Marxist interpreters who make new law."
That sounds like "fun". Sign me up!!!
I enjoy your agony Buchananite bitter loser.
Wrong again. Don't you get tired of being wrong?
I am still thinking that Frist will nuke 'em.