Posted on 07/14/2005 10:29:09 AM PDT by blam
New Lapita find re-dates known Fiji settlers
VITAL CLUE: The pottery shard, at least 200 years older than any other piece found in Fiji, is thought to be the work of the Lapita people that originated near Taiwan
AFP , AUCKLAND
Sunday, Oct 24, 2004
A biological anthropologist excavates a skeleton after archeologists discovered a 3,000-year-old cemetery in Vanuatu in August, holding secrets about the first humans to colonize the South Pacific. A shard of pottery showing a human face, pre-dating any other Lapita pottery in Fiji, has now been found and hailed a s a significant discovery.
PHOTO: AFP
Staring out from an ancient piece of pottery, the mysterious face of a bearded man has given scientists a unique glimpse of what the first settlers of Fiji may have looked like.
Researchers say the "extraordinary discovery" is a vital clue in mapping out how the South Pacific came to be inhabited some 3,000 years ago, suggesting the first direct link to islands some thousands of kilometers away.
Thought to be the work of the Lapita people -- a long-lost race which originated near modern-day Taiwan then migrated to Polynesia -- the fragment is also at least 200 years older than any other piece found in Fiji.
"This is the first time that a clearly recognizable face design made in three dimensions on a piece of Lapita pottery has been found in Fiji," said a statement from the University of the South Pacific, based in the archipelago.
Preliminary analysis shows that the eerie-looking face consists of a prominent raised nose, the left eye and what might be eyelashes, said Roselyn Kumar of the University of the South Pacific's Institute of Applied Sciences.
`It could go some way towards settling the long archaeological debate on the settling of Polynesia.'
There are also designs that suggest what might be head-hair, and crescent shapes on the base which were possibly intended to represent beard-hair.
The find therefore gives researchers an opportunity to gaze on the countenance of Fiji's first inhabitants, from whom modern Polynesians are believed to be descended.
But equally significant is that it is the first time that a facial design has been found on Lapita pottery outside a group of islands north of Papua New Guinea -- which are some 3,400km away from Fiji.
"As such it represents an extraordinary discovery," the university said.
The find made it possible to conclude that the early people of Fiji had at some stage come from the far-off island chain, named the Bismarck Archipelago, Geography Professor Patrick Nunn said.
It could go some way towards settling the long archaeological debate on the settling of Polynesia -- a vast triangle of islands from Hawaii in the north, to New Zealand in the south-east and Rapanui or Easter Island in the east.
The new face fragment was found near Natadola Beach, west of the Fijian capital Suva, in the tourist area of Viti Levu island.
Around 60 pottery pieces were found during excavations and radiocarbon dating established the shard with the face design was 3,260 years old -- whereas Fiji's next oldest-known Lapita settlement goes back only 3,000 years.
It was possible that Natadola was the first place of human settlement in Fiji, Nunn said.
He added that the analysis suggested that the designs were made using the unique Lapita technique of pot decoration known as dentate stamping, whereby lines are made from a series of tiny regularly-spaced dots applied to the pottery before it was fired.
"It was a very time-consuming and precise technique used to create intricate designs, perhaps associated with ancestor worship," he said.
More than 100 Lapita sites have been located over an area from New Guinea to western Polynesia, a distance of over 4,000km.
US archaeologist Edward Gifford gave the race their name after mishearing the indigenous name of a site in New Caledonia where he was working in 1952.
He had found shards of distinctive pottery there and recognized a link to similar finds to the north in New Guinea.
The article that I really want to post is coming in a link. It is an article dated today about a new discovery but, it is from the news source IOL which we are not allow to post from, it's okay to link. So...
The Link:
Facinating! Chasing down the African orign myth would also be interesting. Seems like there is yet quite a story to be told.
In order to tie Kennewick to Joman/Ainu kinship, a time line needs to fit. Can you suggest one?
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on, off, or alter the "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list --
Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
The GGG Digest -- Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)
I remember right after Kennewick Man was discovered I saw a DNA breakdown of his DNA, at the top was Ainu, then Polynesian and so on...then it completely disappeared and the next thing I saw was that the DNA results were inconclusive...by that time, the government and the Indians had managed to suppress all information. The scientiests are presently studying Kennewick Man's skeleton and I expect any/the report to be crtptic at best.
Anyway, Stephen Oppenheimer, in his book, Eden In The East, states that the oldest (undisputed) Mongoloid skeleton ever found is only 10,000 years old. The oldest skeletons found in the Americas ( minus Luzia, who looks African, Brazil) are non-Mongoloid and seem to have the same skull/body type as Kennewick Man. Now, if you'll look at the map made by Oppenheimer I've linked below, he shows and entry into the Americas into Meadowcroft 25,000 years ago that becomes isolated for a period. He mentions in the same section that the Indians in that region (Objiwa) today have a high (25%) of the 'X' (halotype) gene shared by American Indians and some Europeans only.(The link was broken by the Toba explosion 75,000 years ago.) I'm guessing that the folks who entered 25,000 years ago are related to Kennewick Man and are the source of the 'X' gene in the Americas. A good DNA study of Kennewick Man could be revealing.
It is my opinion that the Jomon (and possibly Ainu) types dominated large areas of Asia in ancient times and produced today's Caucasians and Mongoloids
I don't know why someone hasn't gone to Japan and done a DNA analysis of the surviving Ainu remnants there.
Did you see this? Thoughts?
Will have to get back to you on this. It's late and I haven't shaved.
FYI ping.
Thanks!
WOW! Good link!
|
· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic · subscribe · |
|||
Antiquity Journal & archive Archaeologica Archaeology Archaeology Channel BAR Bronze Age Forum Discovery Dogpile Eurekalert LiveScience Mirabilis.ca Nat Geographic PhysOrg Science Daily Science News Texas AM Yahoo Excerpt, or Link only? |
|
||
|
· Science topic · science keyword · Books/Literature topic · pages keyword · |
|||
uh oh. Your link article also refers to an extraordinary find of an obsidian tool.
Obsidian also suggests Mexico where large deposits are found. Tie that together with the jadite find and what do you get?
Thor Heyderdahl and Kon Tiki.
Don’t you just love the way unusual discoveries about the peregrinations of humans around the world often threaten the old standard theories?
I do.
:’)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
