Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Developer Begins Process to Seize Justice Souter's Homestead
The Autonomist ^ | Wednesday, June 29, 2005 | Rocco DiPippo

Posted on 06/29/2005 7:52:11 PM PDT by DaveTesla

Last week, I reported on the Supreme Court's Kelo vs City of New London decision, which seriously weakened Constitutionally guaranteed private property rights.

Now, in what can only be viewed as an attempt at pure poetic justice, a budding developer, businessman Logan Darrow Clements, has begun the process of seizing Supreme Court Justice David Souter's homestead in Weare, New Hampshire and replacing it with a hotel.

Citing the Kelo decision, Clements has contacted Weare's building official, saying:

"Although this property is owned by an individual, David H. Souter, a recent Supreme Court decision, "Kelo vs. City of New London" clears the way for this land to be taken by the Government of Weare through eminent domain and given to my LLC for the purposes of building a hotel. The justification for such an eminent domain action is that our hotel will better serve the public interest as it will bring in economic development and higher tax revenue to Weare."

Think the Fab Five ever considered that the Kelo ruling might directly threaten their property rights?

As I've said before, when our Constitution is ignored, all Americans suffer the consequences.

Clements is currently seeking investors to fund the project. He can be reached by clicking here. Encourage him to develop similar plans for properties owned by Supreme Court Justices Breyer, Ginsburg, Kennedy and Stevens.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: New Hampshire
KEYWORDS: announcements; assetforfeiture; awholelottakeywords; collectivistjudges; confiscation; connecticut; crowpie; davidsouter; elitistpig; eminentdomain; fascisminaction; foxnews; goodforthegander; hannityandcolmes; justdesserts; kelo; kelodecision; kelovsnewlondon; liberaljudges; liberalstruecolors; lostlibertyhotel; newlondon; privateproperty; propertyrights; propertyseizure; scotus; souter; tyranny; whatsgoodforthegoose
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-149 next last
To: softwarecreator
They (five USSC justices) change their minds and rescind
their decision and and we change ours.
21 posted on 06/29/2005 8:10:53 PM PDT by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: skimbell
Only problem I can see is with Ginsburg. Something spooky about that old bat.

Well, she was a lawyer for the ACLU. I believe she was in their 'upper management' or possibly was in charge of one district, if I am not mistaken.

Ginsburger is the perfect example of what can happen when the spineless, cowardly Republican Senators do not stand up and fight. Klinton appointed her, there was no dissent from the Republicans and I believe she was approved something like 99-0.

22 posted on 06/29/2005 8:12:20 PM PDT by technomage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DaveTesla; All; Lloyd227

http://www.pledgebank.com/LostLibHotel

PLEDGED!

Current count 343


23 posted on 06/29/2005 8:14:15 PM PDT by MAK1179 (it's like playing a game of trivial pursuit with a retard, you always win, but it's not satisfying)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: notaliberal

Just think, if ever conservative American sent him one dollar, so that he could buy up ever justice's property and throw them out.


24 posted on 06/29/2005 8:16:01 PM PDT by Paul Atreides (Do something nice for a Gitmo detainee: buy him a pit bull, for his cell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DaveTesla
They (five USSC justices) change their minds and rescind their decision and and we change ours.

Hahahaha .... one of those "so, are we going to hurt each other" tactics?

I just love this idea ... perfect!

25 posted on 06/29/2005 8:16:56 PM PDT by softwarecreator (Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DaveTesla

BUMP!!


26 posted on 06/29/2005 8:20:04 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
the same must be done to ALL of the Justices

Unfortunately, if you do the same to ALL of them, they must ALL recuse themselves from the case, and by precedent already set by Kelo vs. New London, we would not have a reversal of the Kelo decision. Yes, they would lose their homes, but we would still be shorted our property rights since no new precedent would be set to correct the injustice already done.

27 posted on 06/29/2005 8:21:49 PM PDT by CellPhoneSurfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DaveTesla
What's he gonna pay Souter for his digs? Not more than a pitance, I hope.

Payback is a bitch, Davey-boy.

28 posted on 06/29/2005 8:21:50 PM PDT by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveTesla

We should support this effort and, when the justices are removed from their dwellings and move to another location, we should begin the process again at their new abode... until they -- in emergency session before October -- gather to re-decide this ruling of theirs. Then... maybe then... they'll get the message. In the meantime, a chain of Liberty Hotels sounds damn fine.


29 posted on 06/29/2005 8:23:24 PM PDT by Types_with_Fist (I'm on FReep so often that when I read an article at another site I scroll down for the comments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveTesla
"Last week, I reported on the Supreme Court's Kelo vs City of New London decision, which seriously weakened Constitutionally guaranteed private property rights."

Not long ago, many in this forum cheered on as the Oklahoma legislature violated private property rights by passing into law a bill which prohibited employers from banning firearms in their company parking lots. This law is a clear violation of the property rights of the owners of those companies.

The Government cares very little whose property rights they violate, and by cheering on the violation of the property rights of others, we give tacit support to those we call oppressive.

Beauseant!

30 posted on 06/29/2005 8:23:52 PM PDT by Lancelot Jones (Non nobis, Domine, non nobis, sed nomini tuo da gloriam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: politicalwit
Maybe if it were done to them they would better be able
to understand what the Constitution says, why this article
was written and what it means.

Maybe the drafters of the Constitution had their property taken
and due to their experiences (and feelings on the matter)
included the language in the Constitution to prevent
such abuses in the New Republic.
31 posted on 06/29/2005 8:24:25 PM PDT by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
1000 people with 100 dollars equals $100,000 dollars. 1000 people with $1000.00 equal one million. I'm not a rich man, but to stick it to this guy legally, I would scrape $1000.00

I told my father this morning and he is willing to kick in $100.

Really? how many conservatives would be willing to kick in $100.00 dollars to fight back legally?

$100.00 is beer money for some of you guys! :-)

Or you can keep your beer and drink it under a bridge.

32 posted on 06/29/2005 8:26:35 PM PDT by Bear_Slayer (DOC - 81mm Mortars, Wpns Co. 2/3 KMCAS 86-89)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DaveTesla

Oh... I just LOVE This! I hope it's true.


33 posted on 06/29/2005 8:29:07 PM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

No matter what the outcome, I hope that this legal assault by Clements ends up costing that scumbag Souter lots and lots of money. I hope this drags out in court for a decade and gives Souter a throbbing, puke-inducing migraine that never, ever stops.


34 posted on 06/29/2005 8:29:14 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DaveTesla

Dig it.


35 posted on 06/29/2005 8:30:18 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: technomage
Ginsburger is the perfect example of what can happen when the spineless, cowardly Republican Senators do not stand up and fight. Klinton appointed her, there was no dissent from the Republicans and I believe she was approved something like 99-0.

Actually, and I could be wrong, someone feel free to correct me if so, but I believe we actually had 2 0r 3 Repub senators with enough ba@@s to vote no on her confirmation.

36 posted on 06/29/2005 8:34:13 PM PDT by Marathoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MAK1179; All

http://www.pledgebank.com/LostLibHotel

Make that 351

To any one that can afford a fancy night's stay in a hotel;

Freep This.


37 posted on 06/29/2005 8:35:01 PM PDT by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Bear_Slayer

Freep this...

http://www.pledgebank.com/LostLibHotel


38 posted on 06/29/2005 8:36:38 PM PDT by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

Me too. So contact the fellow and suggest a Partnership and advertise the partnerships on Free Republic. Surely there are enough of us to put up a bit of cash. This indeed is a very good cause. I'll bet that town could use the tax increase a 'better' use of the land would provide.


39 posted on 06/29/2005 8:36:59 PM PDT by hardworking (Support equal rights for gays and lesbians - put Hitlery in the White House!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Again, the same must be done to ALL of the Justices

AND some senators and reps. I'll bet MANY of them own some prime real estate that is not being used to the best 'tas' advantage for their respective communities.


40 posted on 06/29/2005 8:38:07 PM PDT by hardworking (Support equal rights for gays and lesbians - put Hitlery in the White House!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-149 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson