Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Roswell Smoking Gun, the Ramey Memo - (explosive new proof;UFO crash N.M. 1947; gov't cover-up!)
UFO CASE BOOK.COM ^ | JUNE 28, 2005 | DAVID RUDIAK

Posted on 06/29/2005 9:24:26 AM PDT by CHARLITE

Note: This article is an addendum to The Roswell Crash, and Roswell, 50 years and counting. (Links on website:http://ufocasebook.com/rameymemo.html


Barely noticeable in one of the 1947 photos and clutched in Gen. Ramey's left hand is a slip of paper (boxed in red). Probably unwittingly, Gen. Ramey had the text side facing towards the camera, allowing the text on this paper to be photographed.

When blown up and analyzed, it tells a remarkably different story of events from the one Ramey or contemporary Air Force counter-intelligence wants you to believe.


The message turns out to be a telegram from Gen. Ramey to the Pentagon and Gen. Hoyt Vandenberg, the acting AAF Chief of Staff at the time. Ramey is providing Vandenberg an update on the very fluid situation in-the-field at Roswell. The first paragraph describes what had been found. Ramey starts by acknowledging "THAT A 'DISK' IS NEXT NEW FIND." He then adds that "THE VICTIMS OF THE WRECK" and something else (possibly just "A WRECK") had also been found near the recovery "OPERATION AT THE 'RANCH'." At the end it states that "YOU" (i.e. Gen. Vandenberg) had ordered the "victims" and/or the wreckage "FORWARDED" to "FORT WORTH, TEX."

In the second paragraph, Ramey describes how the situation was being handled. Ramey first states that something "IN THE 'DISC'", probably the bodies of the "forwarded" "victims" (and possibly termed "AVIATORS") would be flown by a B-29 Special Transport or C-47 to the "A1" (personnel director) of some "8TH ARMY****" division, most likely the head flight surgeon at Fort Worth given the context. Wright Field, Ohio, home of the AAF's aeronautical labs, was to assess the Roswell crash object (possibly referred to as an "AIRFOIL").

Finally Ramey outlines how the situation was being treated publicly and how they were going to cover it up. First he assures Vandenberg that the earlier highly inflammatory Roswell base press release (referred to as the "MISSTATE MEANING OF STORY") was the work of an Army counter-intelligence team ("CIC/TEAM"), but that the "NEXT SENT OUT PR" (Press Release) would be "OF WEATHER BALLOONS."

Ramey finishes with the statement that the weather balloon story might be better accepted if they also added weather balloon radar target demonstrations. This apparently was the impetus for the national debunking campaign using the devices that followed over the next few days.


There is no question that Ramey's message, even when greatly enlarged and then enhanced by computer, is a very difficult read because of fuzziness, film grain noise, uneven development, photo defects, paper folds and tilt, shadows, and text obscured at the left margin by Gen. Ramey's thumb. This will inevitably prompt comments from die-hard skeptics that a full "take" on the Ramey message is strictly one's own interpretation. However, there are various keywords and phrases that can be readily seen by anyone, even in lower resolution scans of the message first analyzed in 1999 by a number of people. These keywords and phrases unambiguously prove that there is no truth whatsoever to the various Air Force "explanations," be they the original 1947 "weather balloon" story, or the Air Forces updated "Mogul balloon" and "crash dummies."

Far and away the most important word of the entire message is "VICTIMS" on the third line (part of phrase "THE VICTIMS OF THE WRECK"). If there were "VICTIMS", then this was no Mogul balloon crash. As the Air Force Roswell report itself noted (using splendid circular reasoning) reports of bodies being recovered couldn't be true because the crash was of a Mogul balloon, which had "no 'alien' passengers therein."

Of course Ramey's mention of "VICTIMS" in 1947 also disproves the already preposterous "crash dummies" theory. The only way these 1950's crash dummies could be "victims" is if they also time-warped back to 1947.

Another easily seen keyword and phrase is "DISC" and "IN THE 'DISC" on the fifth line. Ramey is clearly describing the crash object as a "DISC", not as a "weather balloon", or a "Mogul" or a "radar target" or a "RAWIN" (jargon term for a radar wind target), or any other word or phase that in any way suggests some sort of balloon or balloon paraphenalia. In fact, the only mention of "weather balloons" and "RAWIN" targets comes at the very end of the message in the context of issued public statements and damage-control.

(The word "DISK" is also used on the first line in reference to what had been found, but this instance of the word is not so easily seen.)

Furthermore, the message refers to the subsequent shipment of something "IN the disc." Neither balloons nor the two-dimensional, flimsy radar kites had anything "inside" that could be shipped. If Ramey had been referring to some piece of balloon payload equipment, then the phrase should have begun with "attached to" or "suspended from", or "with", etc. In speaking of "THE VICTIMS OF THE WRECK",, using the word "DISC" for the crash object, and shipping something "IN THE DISC", Ramey is clearly referring to something other than a balloon crash. The simplest interpretation is to take the words literally. There is no reason for Gen. Ramey to be describing events abstractly in a secret communication to his superiors. This was the actually crash of a so-called "flying disk" craft with a dead crew found on the inside, as corroborated by the testimony of military and civilian witnesses.

Ramey is quite explicit about the existence of bodies and the crash object being a "disc." The only thing not made explicit in the message is the exact nature of the bodies or "disc." Ramey probably does not refer to the bodies as "nonhuman," "alien," or some similar term. Nor does he use terms like "spaceship," "craft of unknown origin," etc. to describe the "disc."

Among the theories about the Roswell incident is that this was the crash of some highly secretive government experimental craft piloted by a human crew. However, nobody has ever presented evidence that such an experimental disk-like craft ever existed or was tested in New Mexico at that time. It also seems highly unlikely that even a highly secret craft but with half-century-old technology would still be kept secret.

Further, it makes no sense that the government would be completely unaware of the crash of one of their own craft until some sheep rancher came into town to report it.

The same logic applies to the crash of something more conventional, such as a bomber carrying nuclear weapons (another theory sometimes proposed). The military would not wait for a local rancher to tell them about it nor would there be any need for continued secrecy into the present day. (Similar nuclear accidents have been declassified and are now in the public record.) And why would Gen. Ramey call it a "disc"?

Finally, both the Air Force and General Accounting Office (investigating on behalf of Congressman Schiff) in 1995 reported that air crash records revealed no plane crashes in that area during that time frame that could possibly explain the Roswell incident. In brief, there is simply no evidence for the crash of any conventional or experimental aircraft.


Telegram held in General Ramey's hand provides smoking gun proof of a "disk" crash and the recovery of "the victims of the wreck."

The Air Force claimed in their 1994/95 Roswell Report that a government photoanalysis lab which they refused to identify ("a national level organization") was unable to "visualize" any "details" in the Ramey memo from first generation prints and negative copies even after digitizing (computer scanning) supposedly because of "insufficient quality." As you look at higher resolution scans readily available to civilians from similar prints, how much "truth" do you suspect was in the Air Force statement?


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS: artbell; coverup; crash; crazy; deanismoresane; general; government; loony; newmexico; nuts; oldnews; ramey; roswell; tinfoilalert; ufo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-174 next last
To: CHARLITE

Yeah, as though ANY photo can be enhanced using "secret military technology" to read the print.


61 posted on 06/29/2005 10:51:46 AM PDT by Mr. Nobody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

I see that every morning. It's called a "school bus".


62 posted on 06/29/2005 10:52:27 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

What seminar was this? What year? Which members of NASA? What are the names of these astronauts? Why would an astronaut even know anything, if the government has no problem putting civilians and tourists up into space? Just what evidence is there that any space aliens are held in Area 51? Just who is this guy making these statements? Why is all this hearsay and unsourced?


63 posted on 06/29/2005 10:55:12 AM PDT by SpringheelJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
And for the strictly Bible-oriented people, if God created the Universe, then "what can not God do?" Who would argue that everything in the Universe is barren, including all planets around every one of billions of suns, and that only planet Earth has life? Exactly!!!
64 posted on 06/29/2005 10:55:24 AM PDT by Beth528
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SoDak

You want to BELIEVE????? Are ya a DUmmie?


65 posted on 06/29/2005 11:01:21 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: thchronic; Eastbound
There were Igigi in the "disc". Boy, are Enki and Enlil gonna be pissed...

There probably aren't many on FR these days who understand that reference.

66 posted on 06/29/2005 11:06:31 AM PDT by tarheelswamprat (This tagline space for rent - cheap!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
"Not that this calculation matters very much, but Einstein once wrote..."

Sir Hoyle calculated that the odds of life arising from non-living material were so small as to not be possible at all.

"And for the strictly Bible-oriented people..."...your logic breaks down from there, however...you missed a fine opportunity to mention Genesis 6, the pre-flood conditions, and the rather mysterious individuals mentioned as being "on the Earth and also afterwards"...and how in the New Testament, we are told that they left their "normal habitation" and did unspeakable things with women...and the mysterious giants mentioned throughout the OT...and how Jesus said that as it was in the days of Noah, so shall it be in the days of the return of the Son of Man. Now THERE'S a "strictly Bible-oriented people" perspective!

67 posted on 06/29/2005 11:09:07 AM PDT by woollyone (Li'l fleas got tiny fleas up'n their backs 2 bite'em/Tiny fleas got tinier fleas & so on adinfinitum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert

LOL...I'm convinced!!


68 posted on 06/29/2005 11:09:53 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (The theory of evolution is the great cosmogenic myth of the twentieth century - Michael Denton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

UMMMM....M Brother was born in Roswell, to an alien mother too.

Yea it is a true statement....


69 posted on 06/29/2005 11:10:49 AM PDT by FlatLandBeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65

It wasnt photoshopped. I saw this on discovery a long time ago


70 posted on 06/29/2005 11:13:31 AM PDT by SwankyC (1st Bn 11th Marines Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tarheelswamprat; thchronic; CHARLITE
'Swing low, sweet chariot . . .'

Black Helicopters -- Circa 900 BC

71 posted on 06/29/2005 12:01:06 PM PDT by Eastbound (Jacked out since 3/31/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: JRjr
Yeah yeah Yah, just wait til a gray lands his saucer on top of your roof and asks for a bag of Doritos.
72 posted on 06/29/2005 12:13:47 PM PDT by keysguy (Time to get rid of the UN and the ACLU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SpringheelJack
Sorry Jack I aint buyin' it and I just got in a fresh order of tin hats.
73 posted on 06/29/2005 12:14:54 PM PDT by keysguy (Time to get rid of the UN and the ACLU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

Then all of those other 100 witnesses were all wearing tin hats?


74 posted on 06/29/2005 12:16:20 PM PDT by keysguy (Time to get rid of the UN and the ACLU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Beth528
Now that's one hell of a mistake to make!!
75 posted on 06/29/2005 12:17:59 PM PDT by keysguy (Time to get rid of the UN and the ACLU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
Sorry what you saw was a meteorite or swamp gas or a helo or something else. Could not be anything better than what we have here. We are the ultimate beings of the universe. Just look at our cheeseburger factories.
76 posted on 06/29/2005 12:20:55 PM PDT by keysguy (Time to get rid of the UN and the ACLU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Careful the rest of this group is not into heavy duty logic.


77 posted on 06/29/2005 12:22:14 PM PDT by keysguy (Time to get rid of the UN and the ACLU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: StolarStorm
"People will believe what they want to believe"

Bottom line. Don't show them any stinkin proof or evidence, just clouds their judgment.
78 posted on 06/29/2005 12:25:13 PM PDT by keysguy (Time to get rid of the UN and the ACLU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
That was a poster in Mulder's office on The X-Files
79 posted on 06/29/2005 12:28:00 PM PDT by SoDak (sigh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Paradox

"Its like that backward masking thing. If you listen FOR something in a song played backwards, you are bound to hear it."

Hey, I had forgotten about that stuff. CDs killed that whole concept -- or is there some way to play CDs backward? What if I listened standing on my head?


80 posted on 06/29/2005 12:34:47 PM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-174 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson