Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Some Homeowners Vow To Stay Despite Ruling Against Them - But few options seem available
TheDay ^

Posted on 06/24/2005 8:35:12 AM PDT by Happy2BMe

Some Homeowners Vow To Stay Despite Ruling Against Them

But few options seem available

New London — Drive by Michael Cristofaro's home at 50 Denison Ave. tomorrow; he promises you'll see this sign: FOR SALE.

“I'm out of here. I'm selling my home,” Cristofaro, a New London resident for 43 years, said Thursday. “I'm a white-collar worker, a computer engineer. Who do they want living in this town?”

The Cristofaro family owns a second home, at 53 Goshen St., in the Fort Trumbull neighborhood. On Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the city's right to take that home, and the homes of six other property owners, by eminent domain.

The decision came as no surprise to those fighting to save their homes.

“I sort of figured it would go that way,” said Byron Athenian, who lives at what used to be 78 Smith St. before the street in front of his house was demolished. “That's the way the government works.”

But there was anger nonetheless.

“Those justices made the wrong decision,” Cristofaro said. “Four of them protected our property rights; five threw them out the door. I hope their property is chosen next for eminent domain so they know what it's like to be thrown out into the street.”

And even though, after six years of fighting the city, the group seemed to have run low on options, several promised that they would never leave.

“I'm not going anywhere. I'm here,” said William von Winkle, who owns three buildings on what remains of Smith Street. “I'm going to fight until they give up. They can do their little development around here with us here or they can do no development and try to take it, because until they stop trying to take my property by eminent domain, they will not build anything at Fort Trumbull. It's simple as that.”

“I don't know how they're going to get us out,” Cristofaro agreed. “We're going to keep our homes to the bitter end, because what they've done is wrong.”

And they warned every citizen of New London and the nation at large that the court's ruling stripped them of their right to own private property.

“One of the most fundamental rights that the country was built upon has been pretty much obliterated,” said Scott Sawyer, a lawyer who represented the homeowners. “Owning property doesn't seem to amount to much in the United States anymore. Certainly, none of us own our property anymore.”

Richard Beyer, a plaintiff who owns two homes at 41 and 49 Goshen St., agreed.

“We've pretty much lost our right to have private property,” he said. “Everybody that owns homes, their homes are at risk for eminent domain.”

And that, said Beyer, Cristofaro and von Winkle, now translates into giving the land of small property owners to big corporations.

“As one gentleman that I just got off the phone with said, ‘Welcome to Russia,' ” Beyer said. “So it's scary. I just feel bad for my kids when they get to be my age and own their own home. They don't own it. Either the bank owns it or a private corporation's going to own it.”

The homeowners predicted that more land in the city would end up in the hands of private corporations.

“I guarantee you that just about every house from Howard Street to Shaw's Cove is going to be targeted,” Beyer said. “I see that whole district in New London as being Pfizer's business park. It'll be like Avery Point minus the houses. You'll have access to Fort Trumbull State Park and that'll be it.”

Beyer, who with a partner had renovated one of his two houses and was working on the second when the city took them, said one bitter lesson he had learned was never again to do business in New London.

And he pointed out the city has never delivered on its promise that Pfizer's arrival in the city would mean lower taxes.

“The city of New London promised all the residents of New London that all your property taxes will be reduced,” he said. “That promise was never fulfilled. The taxes keep going up ... When is enough enough?”

And who, several asked, would want to build in the Fort Trumbull area now?

“They're taking the properties for an obsolete plan,” von Winkle said. “Today, who would build a hotel in New London, Connecticut? And they certainly wouldn't build an office building. We have half the city empty now. So what are they taking it for?”

For Cristofaro, the home at 53 Goshen St. is the second the city has taken from his family by eminent domain. The city took the first house, on Woodbridge Street near Shaw's Cove, in 1972.

It was a home, Cristofaro said, that his father had lovingly surrounded with fruit trees, grapevines, yews and rhododendrons.

Today it is a parking lot. 


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: banglist; connecticut; constitution; eminentdomain; judicialtyranny; kelo; landgrab; noprivateproperty; oligarchy; powerofthestate; propertyrights; tyranny; unconstitutional; ussc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-217 next last
To: Happy2BMe
...We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. --That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter(1) or to abolish(2) it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.... when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

- excerpt from The Declaration of Independence of the Thirteen Colonies In CONGRESS, July 4, 1776

Note1: The 1st Amendment provides the means to ALTER the Government
Note2:
The 2nd Amendment provides the means to ABOLISH the Government

41 posted on 06/24/2005 8:55:02 AM PDT by kjenerette (Jenerette for Senate - www.jenerette.com - U.S. Army Desert Storm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

What makes you think Bush opposes the SC ruling.


42 posted on 06/24/2005 8:55:37 AM PDT by jpsb (I already know I am a terrible speller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: kjenerette

We're getting very close to "abolishing time" .

LQ


43 posted on 06/24/2005 8:57:58 AM PDT by LizardQueen (The world is not out to get you, except in the sense that the world is out to get everyone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

To any of you Freepers out there that don't seem to think the decision will impact anybody...please tell me WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN RENTING PROPERTY AND OWNING PROPERTY? If you don't pay the rent, you get evicted. If you don't pay your property taxes, you get "evicted". Now, you can get evicted even if you do pay your "rent" if the landlord finds someone who will pay more. I think this ruling, in one fell swoop, wiped away the last vestiges of property ownership in the U.S.


44 posted on 06/24/2005 8:58:17 AM PDT by Lekker 1 ("Who the hell wants to hear actors talk?"- Harry M. Warner, Warner Bros., 1927)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjenerette
Maybe the Congress will step in.

Perhaps the Senate will lend assistance.

The President could intervene.

(After all 3 Bodies of the government have been exhaused with no relief - what recourse is there?)

45 posted on 06/24/2005 8:58:20 AM PDT by Happy2BMe ("Viva La Migra" - LONG LIVE THE BORDER PATROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

read later


46 posted on 06/24/2005 8:59:06 AM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998
What good would it do to have a Constitutional Amendment? The Supremo's have amended the Constitution to suit their left wing beliefs so they would just amend it again. We no longer have a Constitution we have a Supreme Court, some of whom have made themselves dictators for life, so that they can change and amend the Constitution as they please.
47 posted on 06/24/2005 8:59:10 AM PDT by YOUGOTIT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lekker 1
"I think this ruling, in one fell swoop, wiped away the last vestiges of property ownership in the U.S."

=================================

SSsssHHhhhhh!

You're going to alert the tax base - THEN WHAT?

48 posted on 06/24/2005 8:59:47 AM PDT by Happy2BMe ("Viva La Migra" - LONG LIVE THE BORDER PATROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: LizardQueen

What we need to do is a "minuteman" response to stand with these people in support. Safety in numbers.


49 posted on 06/24/2005 8:59:58 AM PDT by beltfed308 (Cloth or link. Happiness is a perfect trunion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Lexington Green
The Constitution is dead. Welcome to your tyranny.

Most on this site didn't see it comming when they supported the repeal of the first and forth. Now a big part of the fifth is gone and all of a sudden they care? Not.

These people are RBAs. (Republicans before Americans)

This same result would be welcomed if they were Republican inititives under the guise of the WOT or WOD.

50 posted on 06/24/2005 9:00:15 AM PDT by Protagoras (Now that the frog is fully cooked, how would you like it served?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
Well, there is only one option left...if we can find them we can always hire...
51 posted on 06/24/2005 9:01:13 AM PDT by Kokojmudd (Vote out Liberal Republicans! Impeach the Tyrants in Black Robes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

I did not think about that but I would assume if they do not leave they will burn them out and arrest them and put them in jail. Just because they are Constitutionally correct and the five tyrants in black robes are not.


52 posted on 06/24/2005 9:01:58 AM PDT by YOUGOTIT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

If this site is about activism like some claim, they should be calling for hundreds of thousands of Americans to surround these homes on the day the government thugs come with their bulldozers. And stay til the government thugs back down.


53 posted on 06/24/2005 9:02:38 AM PDT by Protagoras (Now that the frog is fully cooked, how would you like it served?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras

"These people are RBAs. (Republicans before Americans)"


I know what you mean, I'm a conservative libertarian American first and a republican second.


54 posted on 06/24/2005 9:03:00 AM PDT by cripplecreek (I zot trolls for fun and profit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

Congress has NO POWER. The black robed dictators have taken all the power to themselves.


55 posted on 06/24/2005 9:03:03 AM PDT by YOUGOTIT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.

56 posted on 06/24/2005 9:03:03 AM PDT by BulletBobCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

"After all 3 Bodies of the government have been exhaused with no relief - what recourse is there?"

The Second Amendment.


57 posted on 06/24/2005 9:03:43 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

I wonder if they could incorporate and declare themselve self-governing? Get the city off their backs.


58 posted on 06/24/2005 9:03:46 AM PDT by Puddleglum (Thank God the Boston blowhard lost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kokojmudd

If you want to let Pfizer know how you feel, here are some phone numbers:

Pfizer contact numbers:

Pfizer Prescription Medicine
1-800-TRY-FIRST (1-800-879-3477)
Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. EST


Legacy Pharmacia Prescription Medicine Questions
1-800-TRY-FIRST (1-800-879-3477)
Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. EST

Pfizer Consumer Products
1-800-223-0182
Monday through Friday 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. EST


Legacy Pharmacia Consumer Products
1-800-223-0182
Monday through Friday 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. EST

Pfizer Animal Health Customer Service and Product Support
1-800-366-5288
Monday through Friday 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. and 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. EST

Legacy Pharmacia Animal Health Customer Service and Product Support
1-800-793-0596
Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. EST

Shareholders
Pfizer shareholders of record needing assistance and information.

Phone
1-800-733-9393
Weekdays 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. EST
An automated response system is available 24 hours a day.


Headquarters
Pfizer Inc
235 East 42nd Street
New York, NY 10017
USA


Phone
1-212-733-2323

If you want to know what Pfizer makes so you can decide how to spend your money, here is a partial list:

Pfizer Products:

Actifed®
Actifed® Cold and Sinus

Actifed® Cold And Allergy
Benadryl®
Benadryl® Severe Allergy and Sinus Headache Caplets

Benadryl-D™ Allergy & Sinus Fastmelt® Tablets
Children's Benadryl® Allergy and Cold Fastmelt® Tablets
Children's Benadryl® Allergy Chewables

Benadryl® Allergy & Cold Caplets

Benadryl-D™ Allergy & Sinus Tablets

Children's Benadryl-D™ Allergy & Sinus Liquid Medication

Benadryl® Allergy Kapseals® Capsules

Children's Benadryl® Allergy Liquid Medication

Benadryl® Allergy & Sinus Headache Caplets & Gelcaps

Benadryl® Allergy Ultratab® Tablets

Children's Benadryl® Dye-Free Allergy Liquid
Benadryl® Dye-Free Allergy Liqui-Gels® Softgels
Children's Benadryl® Allergy Fastmelt® Tablets


Benylin®
Benylin® Adult Formula

Benylin® Expectorant

Benylin® Pediatric
Luden's®
Luden's® Cough Drops with Vitamin C
Luden's® Sugar Free Throat Drops
Luden's® Throat Drops
NasalCrom®
NasalCrom® Nasal Spray
PediaCare®
Children's PediaCare® Cold & Allergy
Children's PediaCare® Long-Acting Cough Plus Cold Liquid and Chewables
Children's PediaCare® Medicated Freezer Pops Long-Acting Cough
Children's PediaCare® Multi-Symptom Cold Liquid and Chewables
Children's PediaCare® NightRest Cough & Cold
Infants' PediaCare® Decongestant
Infants' PediaCare® Decongestant & Cough
Infants' PediaCare® Long-Acting Cough
Sinutab®
Sinutab® Non-Drying Liquid Caps

Sinutab® Sinus Tablets

Sinutab® Sinus Allergy Caplets
SudaCare™
Children's SudaCare™ Nighttime Vapor-Plug™ Mini Waterless Vaporizer

SudaCare™ Nighttime Vapor-Plug™ Mini Waterless Vaporizer

Sudafed®
Children's Sudafed® Cold & Cough Liquid

Children's Sudafed® Nasal Decongestant Liquid

Children's Sudafed® Nasal Decongestant Chewable Tablets

Sudafed® 12 Hour Tablets

Sudafed® Sinus and Allergy Tablets

Sudafed® Cold & Cough Liquid Caps

Sudafed® Sinus & Cold Liquid Caps

Sudafed PE™ Maximum Strength Nasal Decongestant

Sudafed® Nasal Decongestant Tablets

Sudafed® 24 Hour Tablets

Sudafed® Non-Drying Sinus Liquid Caps

Sudafed® Severe Cold Formula Caplets & Tablets

Sudafed® Sinus Headache Caplets & Tablets

Sudafed® Sinus Nighttime Tablets

Sudafed® Sinus Nighttime Plus Pain Relief Caplets


Unisom® Unisom SleepGels® Gelcaps
Unisom SleepTabs® Tablets

Zantac®

Rolaids®

Dramamine®

Emetrol®

Gelusil®

Kaopectate®

Benadryl®

BENGAY®

Cortizone

Desitin®

Micatin®

Neosporin®

Polysporin®

Proxacol®

Wart-Off®

All Listerine products

All Efferdent Products

Plax

Fresh n Brite toothpaste

All Tucks products

All Anusol products

Hemorid

All Lubriderm products

All Pacquin products

All Purell products

Cornhuskers Lotion

All Bengay products

I'm glad I don't own any stock in this company. I have a feeling it won't be worth much for long.


59 posted on 06/24/2005 9:05:55 AM PDT by jeffers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: camle
"yet New Londoners keep electing these people..."

I imagine the city council thinks they have just fulfilled the will of New Londoners, helping the economy. It's perfectly democratic, the majority voted to help themselves to the property of the minority, for the common good. And, as the Supreme Court just ruled, the USA is all about, not individual rights, but the common good and democracy.

60 posted on 06/24/2005 9:08:23 AM PDT by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-217 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson