Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Here come Chinese cars (Detroit alert!)
Business Week ^ | 09 june 2005 | Business week

Posted on 06/11/2005 6:46:30 AM PDT by voletti

Korean cars gave Detroit fits in the late '90s by undercutting domestic small cars on price and outdoing them on quality -- then moving up into other segments. Autos from China could provide more lower-cost competition for the Big Three at a time when GM and Ford Motor Co. (F ) are already reeling. That could cost them, along with Chrysler (DCX ), more market share and prod them to move more of their own production offshore.

How fast can the Chinese gear up? The way things are going, it won't take 20 years to match Toyota Motor Corp. (TM ) quality levels, as it did for the Koreans. And with Chinese auto assembly workers earning $2 an hour -- vs. $22 in Korea and nearly $60 in the U.S. for wages and benefits -- it may not be long before China has the wherewithal to start selling competitively priced cars overseas. "The Chinese are probably five or six years away from being able to sell a competent low-end car," says auto analyst Maryann N. Keller.

The Chinese government is putting its heft behind the export push -- subsidizing the export drive of such local players as Chery and giving the likes of Honda big incentives. Beijing also is nudging foreign auto makers to divert investment into export production so local partners can become familiar with managing foreign-exchange risk and global supply chains. It's also pushing domestic companies such as Chery, Geely Auto, Brilliance China Automotive (CBA ), and Shanghai Automotive Industry to develop their own brands overseas.

(Excerpt) Read more at businessweek.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: automakers; china; turass
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 301 next last
To: wrathof59

Did your neighbor also tell you that most of the problems are in the foreign made parts? GM like all other car companies has been forced to outsource their parts to third world countries. Please note GM scrapped these cars- didn't try to sell them. Just a little info for you...Japan is also suffering serious quality problems because they too have been forced to begin manufacturing parts in third world countries. Go ahead and bash GM, buy your crappy foreign car but remember a sinking economy (especially for the middle class)will sink your family also- in time. Tell me-in what industry do you suggest your children work? Perhaps, they could work in IT-wait It is being outsourced to India and other countries. Let's see I know -how about steel? Wait cheap foreign made steel has destroyed the steel industry. I guess they will have to flip burgers or work for the government. Perhaps (like me) they could work for a foreign company-15 workers are employed and the profits are sent to company headquarters every two weeks-that would be in Europe- my friend- where they employ hundreds of people.


81 posted on 06/11/2005 8:56:12 AM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: voletti
It is inevitable that GM and Ford and Chrysler will move their manufacturing to China. Their survival is at stake. I'm sure the protectionist elements in the U.S. will press for import duties and the like to try to stem this tide but it just won't work. Japan will probably have to do the same thing. The unions made the bet that they could milk the American public via the big automakers forever. They were wrong. They are going to lose that bet big time.

And don't forget. That big trade deficit we have with China is not as bad as it looks. We buy their plastic toys. They bring those bucks back to the U.S. and buy U.S. Treasuries. Because they are a big buyer their presence in the market increases demand and raises the price of Treasuries. This is good. High price for Treasuries equals low interest for Treasuries and low interest for you when you want to refinance that mortgage at a low interest rate. Ending this marriage of convenience would cost us all in many ways.

82 posted on 06/11/2005 8:57:34 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Not bad. I agree with you that China is no longer a Communistic country. They are in transition. The Chinese have always been inclined to be marketers/traders. They were never suited for Communism.

Americans are going to have to make a lot of adjustments as the world grows ever smaller. We are no longer an isolated country. Nobody is. Mankind will have to learn to live and work together, like it or not. We will live together or die together. If I were a young person I would be looking toward China for investments.

83 posted on 06/11/2005 8:58:42 AM PDT by WVNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

This is untrue. Robotics are used in every car plant in the US...my husband works for GM in management. Unions have truly tried to work with management-giving concessions only to watch as incompetent CEO's give themselves fat raised.


84 posted on 06/11/2005 8:59:13 AM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: nyconse
Read this article about GM using PLASTIC intake manifolds, and try to tell everyone the problem is foreign parts and not bad design.

http://consumeraffairs.com/automan/plastic.html

85 posted on 06/11/2005 9:00:13 AM PDT by Wayne07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: MrShoop

I have a question about your Consumer Reports link. It lists the Toyota Prius as one of the most satisfying and the (replaced by the Cobalt) Cavalier as one of the least satisfying.

Now here's the question: Do you think Consumer Reports adjusts their rankings by sales volume? I don't. Toyota sells about 20,000 Priuses a year. Chevy sold 200,000 Cavaliers a year. Doesn't sound like an apples-to-apples comparison to me. In fact, ALL of the "most satisfying" small cars are niche market cars.


86 posted on 06/11/2005 9:00:38 AM PDT by Doohickey (CO during fire drill: "Are we conducting a training evolution or porpoising for the hell of it?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Pessimist
How come the foreign auto makers can build here cost effectively and the US auto makers can't?

To a large extent because GM, Ford and Daimler-Chrysler got huge retirement benefits to pay out.
87 posted on 06/11/2005 9:00:41 AM PDT by Cronos (Never forget 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick
Well, we know it isn't Walmart.



Patoruzú and his loyal steed Pampero brought to you by Frank M. Pohole
88 posted on 06/11/2005 9:01:55 AM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: pickemuphere

I happen to like the Aztec...myself. However any country that allows foreign countries to destroy complete industries deserves what they get. Where will jobs come from in the futures? I can tell you the jobs won't come from steel, garment, electronics or IT. Where will the jobs come from and how much will these jobs pay-enough to support the middle class?


89 posted on 06/11/2005 9:03:31 AM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: music is math
I don't know about the US, but here in Australia, less than 18% of the private-sector workforce is unionised.

It's less than 13%. That doesn't prevent union haters from demagoguing the idea that unions are destroying the country.

90 posted on 06/11/2005 9:06:14 AM PDT by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

Really! Explain exactly how American workers can be expected to compete with those that earn two dollars an hour? Some prisoner labor is also employed in China. There is little concern for the envionment in China also thus saving companies billions of dollars. My husband is management, but we see the handwriting on the wall. It is the trade agreements which never benefitted the workers in this country and have been unfairly applied (anti US) which are destroying this country-not the unions.


91 posted on 06/11/2005 9:08:43 AM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: voletti

about 4 years ago or so the orange county register reported that uc irvine was teaching the chinese how to market cars in the united states.

they had photos of the chinese out on beach blvd looking at american car dealerships.


92 posted on 06/11/2005 9:10:00 AM PDT by ken21 (if you didn't see it on tv, then it didn't happen. /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pessimist
How come the foreign auto makers can build here cost effectively and the US auto makers can't?

Unions. I have a friend who is an engineer. She finally got fed up at GM and went to Honda.

93 posted on 06/11/2005 9:10:36 AM PDT by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Doohickey

I think most people would consider 20,000 a statistically significant sample. If we were surveying the 90 people who bought a Ferrari F430 I'd agree with you. :]


94 posted on 06/11/2005 9:14:12 AM PDT by Wayne07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: MrShoop

I am a GM wife. I am familiar with GM cars and policies. You have no idea what it is like. For example, a number of years ago (under trade laws) GM and Germany made an agreement about the number of Chevy Vans which could be sold in both countries. The Germans took so many and the US took so many. After the cars were build Germany reneged on the deal and refused to take the amount of cars agreed upon. These cars were scrapped as they were built to German specifications and could not be sold in the US Germany got away with this behavior, and they sold every single car in the US per their agreement which they never even honored. This is business as usual in the anti-US global world. GM is trying to lower costs in order to stay in business. They are trying to lower costs by using less expensive parts. Also the same press that hate America in general hates American business in particular because American business is the only thing which prevents socialism from flourishing in this country. Go ahead support the destruction of American business...but your children will live in slavery-socialism.


95 posted on 06/11/2005 9:18:32 AM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: nyconse
What a steaming pile of .... GM product. I personally am tired of all the pro-GM, pro-protectionism whining I am hearing around here. GM death is LONG overdue. They have been building $#!t, PURE $#!T, for decades. The Japanese and Koreans (and anyone else who builds a better car) deserve to eat the US car manufacturers lunch.

Other countries don't owe it to us to buy our cars if all we make is junk! Build a decent value car in the US and it will sell; continue to build the same noncompetitive crud Detroit has been churning out for 30+ years and don't be surprised when even people in the US decide they prefer a Chinese car.

We have choice to buy Japanese, Korean, German, even Chinese because this is a free market. US makers are not competitive in those markets for the same reasons they are barely competitive here... they cannot delver on the price or the quality other manufacturers do.

To save these industries (auto, steel, textile) we need to destroy the unions and reform the tax, regulatory and tort structures here. We cannot save industry and keep the US strong by protecting inefficient, expensive, nonproductive or non-responsive domestic producers and taking away the US consumers freedom to buy in the world market. That kind of protectionism will destroy this economy every bit as much as out of control credit. Nor can we afford to subsidize companies from the ever growing public debt. The best is to let GM et al. die.. they have long deserved their fate.
96 posted on 06/11/2005 9:22:15 AM PDT by Flying Circus (GM twisting in the wind = pure schadenfreude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nyconse
This is untrue. Robotics are used in every car plant in the US

Right, but are they used as much as they could be, or have the unions held out for job protection benefits in every labor contract negotiation?

97 posted on 06/11/2005 9:22:59 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3

This is completely unfair. Honda is subsidized by their government...also they don't have to provide retirement and health benefits to the workers in their own country (government does this). They don't have the cost associated with running an American business. I suppose auto workers should work for minimum wage and have no health benefits....right?


98 posted on 06/11/2005 9:25:24 AM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: aspiring.hillbilly
"Its our fellow american robber barons fast buck artists doing the importing from china. And its all the USA citizens buying the crap from china. And its the govt letting this all happen."

What do you want to happen? The Government are us! Do you want a "Pat Buchanan Wall" put up so there is no Import/Export?

America has not been able to hold on to manufacturing jobs. Every decade we lose a major industry --- Textiles, computer manufacturing, and now: CARS

When are we (and Pat Buchanan) going to learn --- we can't force manufacturing jobs to stay home. It's purely economics.

American ingenuity develops an idea/concept then the 3rd world produces it. How can Detroit ($30/hr) compete with China at $ 2/hr and why do we want to?
99 posted on 06/11/2005 9:26:20 AM PDT by TRY ONE (NUKE the unborn gay whales!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Unions have conceded just about everything...robotics can not do every job...it doesn't work that way. Have you ever toured a modern car manufacturing plant?


100 posted on 06/11/2005 9:26:53 AM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 301 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson