Skip to comments.
LIVE: WA State Governor election-fraud trial begins
TVW (WA public affairs cable) ^
| May 23, 2005
| Hank Rearden
Posted on 05/23/2005 9:58:24 AM PDT by Hank Rearden
The trial to determine whether Christine Gregoire stole the governor's election last November began today at 9am Pacific time.
(I can save everyone a lot of time . . . SHE DID! . . . . but for some reason the lawyers insist on playing their silly games.
My link is to TVW (essentially local C-SPAN), which is broadcasting the trial live on regional cable, and streaming on their website. More coverage is available here on NWCN as well.
This is a landmark trial, as it looks to expose massive 'Rat corruption and voter fraud.
TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: allegedgovernor; ditchthebitch; election; electionfraud; fraudoire; gregoire; gregoiresafake; howtostealanelection; mafiaqueen; rossi; sovietofwashington; stealingelections; stuffingtheballotbox; themostcorruptstate; votefraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 201-217 next last
To: llevrok
81
posted on
05/23/2005 12:12:15 PM PDT
by
llevrok
( Native American* (*born here))
Comment #82 Removed by Moderator
To: Baynative
As opposed to almost ALL auditors and election officials (and even "Republicans for a Day elections voluteers" are DEMOCRAT!
83
posted on
05/23/2005 12:15:11 PM PDT
by
Libertina
(nonewgastax.com (We're going to win!))
To: Hank Rearden
I've read that Governor (Elected) Rossi said he'd rather have a "re-vote" than be declared the winner outright. Having seen some of the predictably laudatory press on Gregoire emanating from the Washington State version of the MSM, however, I think that Mr. Rossi would be better served to take the job so that he would enjoy the benefits of incumbency in the next election.
To: Baynative
The real keeper in democrat arguments so far is that the software used to track and tabulate was bought from a company owned by republicans! I haven't seen any allegations of software failure - how hard can it be to add up numbers?
85
posted on
05/23/2005 12:16:38 PM PDT
by
Hank Rearden
(Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
To: Baynative; SW6906
"I need a drink....... ;o)" I'll join ya...
Count me in!!
86
posted on
05/23/2005 12:18:49 PM PDT
by
The SISU kid
(Defiantly coloring outside the lines since 1964)
To: Baynative
I'll join you with that bottle!
Regarding the software, I heard this morning that it is the same software used by several other counties and that those counties had none of the problems that King County had in reconciling votes.
Things that make you go hmmmmmmm..........
87
posted on
05/23/2005 12:20:23 PM PDT
by
SW6906
To: Hank Rearden
I believe the King County absentee ballot person who lied on the form she filed certifying the ballot count said that there was no way with the software to account for absentees sent, recieved, verified and counted. If that is true, what kind of election software is it?
88
posted on
05/23/2005 12:22:33 PM PDT
by
SW6906
Comment #89 Removed by Moderator
To: Hank Rearden
Did I understand correctly that the Dem's are trying to say that the issue of the falsified absentee ballot report cannot be admitted into evidence because that was not brought up in the beginning?
90
posted on
05/23/2005 12:39:22 PM PDT
by
HannaUSA
(One American that is dang sick of the lies!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
Comment #91 Removed by Moderator
To: HannaUSA
I don't know; I didn't catch a statement like that, but might have missed it.
92
posted on
05/23/2005 12:43:23 PM PDT
by
Hank Rearden
(Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
To: HannaUSA
That's what he was claiming, but the depositions of the individuals that conclusively revealed the fraud were conducted just last week. The democrat argument to keep that issue out of the trial is laughable and the judge will rule against the Democrats.
To: connectthedots
Big WHEW on that one:) I don't drink, but before this is over I may start.....what do you suggest:))
94
posted on
05/23/2005 12:52:47 PM PDT
by
HannaUSA
(One American that is dang sick of the lies!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
Comment #95 Removed by Moderator
To: connectthedots; HannaUSA
I had heard that the Repubs were NOT going to try and raise the idea of fraud, the Demo lawyer alluded to that in his opening statement. I think Nichole Way's testimony changed that scenario last week, so I was a bit surprised when they started talking fraud.
The Demo's argument is that for an "illegal" vote to be illegal a voter registered in a book who actually voted for Governor must be proven. If this is the case I cannot see how this is possible, surely the judge will not require that level of proof?
96
posted on
05/23/2005 12:59:44 PM PDT
by
schu
To: HannaUSA
Big WHEW on that one:) I don't drink, but before this is over I may start.....what do you suggest:)) Are you single or married?
To: seowulf
Bridges appointed by Gardner, I think.
To: Hank Rearden
Did the judge just say that, at this point, alleged fraud is not a component of this case?
99
posted on
05/23/2005 1:33:48 PM PDT
by
Hank Rearden
(Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
To: Hank Rearden
I'm trying to figure that out myself. If I'm hearing correctly, they are saying that fraud uncovered during discovery can't be part of the case if it wasn't alleged at the outset of the case??!!!?
100
posted on
05/23/2005 1:38:36 PM PDT
by
SW6906
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 201-217 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson