[connectthedots]

That's what he was claiming, but the depositions of the individuals that conclusively revealed the fraud were conducted just last week. The democrat argument to keep that issue out of the trial is laughable and the judge will rule against the Democrats.

[HannaUSA]

Big WHEW on that one:) I don't drink, but before this is over I may start.....what do you suggest:))

[schu]

I had heard that the Repubs were NOT going to try and raise the idea of fraud, the Demo lawyer alluded to that in his opening statement. I think Nichole Way's testimony changed that scenario last week, so I was a bit surprised when they started talking fraud.

The Demo's argument is that for an "illegal" vote to be illegal a voter registered in a book who actually voted for Governor must be proven. If this is the case I cannot see how this is possible, surely the judge will not require that level of proof?