Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can China Defeat the United States in a Conventional War?
May 20, 2005 | comtedemaistre

Posted on 05/20/2005 8:09:59 AM PDT by ComtedeMaistre

Every day, the economic power and political influence of Red China continues to increase. I am, however, interested in knowing how powerful China is militarily. Is China strong enough to defeat the US in a conventional war? The latest I heard is that they have a total of 10 million trained to serve in their military, including reserves. I would especially like to hear from Freeper veterans as well as those serving in the military, on the potential threat that China poses to the United States.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Government; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: army; china; chinesemilitary; economy; geopolitics; missiles; technology; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-248 next last
To: ComtedeMaistre
The latest I heard is that they have a total of 10 million trained to serve in their military, including reserves.

Trautman: You bring that many men, just remember one thing.

Trautman: A good supply of body bags.


21 posted on 05/20/2005 8:21:05 AM PDT by xrp (Fox News Channel should rename itself the Mission Persons Network)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ComtedeMaistre

With our involvement in Iraq, no way do we have the manpower and material to eject the Chicoms from Taiwan. However, the strategy will be to prevent them from ever gaining a substantial foothold. The battle will be in the air and in the waters around Taiwan. If you control those, then any invasion will fail. This battle will be won or lost by our Navy and Air Force, not the Army and Marine Corps.


22 posted on 05/20/2005 8:21:22 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ComtedeMaistre

I don't think there could be a conventional war between us. It would quickly go nuclear.


23 posted on 05/20/2005 8:21:32 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ComtedeMaistre
Can China Defeat the United States in a Conventional War?

No.

They could, however, inflict heavy casualties on us before it was over, which would send the appeasers on the left into a tizzy and lead to street demonstrations designed to demoralize the populace and weaken support for the war effort. In other words, the left would be doing exactly what they are doing now in the WOT.
24 posted on 05/20/2005 8:22:06 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (The theory of evolution is the great cosmogenic myth of the twentieth century - Michael Denton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ComtedeMaistre
Can China defeat the US in a conventional war?

That depends on two things:

1) Can we use panties?

2) Which side will Newsweek be on?

25 posted on 05/20/2005 8:22:57 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR

Newsflash

chineese crap was yesterday - they copy american and german crap very precisely today. (To the typeplate)


26 posted on 05/20/2005 8:23:12 AM PDT by Double_in_a_bight (mussi denn mussi denn zum Städele hinaus - Städele hinaus ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ComtedeMaistre

If China thought they could take Taiwan without US intervention, they would have already done so. The mere fact that they threaten to take it rather than just doing it infers: (#1)they're not sure if a confrontation will occur so they are testing the waters regarding a military response and (#2)they are not sure if they could win such a confrontation (conventionally). China had the perfect opportunity when we invaded Iraq. had they moved on Taiwan, I'm not sure we could have effectively spread our resources throughout the Middle East AND Taiwan. The stability of the ME is far more important than Taiwan.


27 posted on 05/20/2005 8:23:18 AM PDT by Icthus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Nr. 1 as a bioweapon ? No ! (conventions of geneva)


28 posted on 05/20/2005 8:24:03 AM PDT by Double_in_a_bight (mussi denn mussi denn zum Städele hinaus - Städele hinaus ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ComtedeMaistre

AT this point they don't have the heavy lift capabilities to move enough man and material half way around the world to kick our butts here.


29 posted on 05/20/2005 8:24:05 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (an enemy of islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fedupwithit

Yet.


Exactly. France and Germany are working on that while we post. As soon as they get that pesky arms embargo lifted.


30 posted on 05/20/2005 8:24:10 AM PDT by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ComtedeMaistre

In response to your first question, the short answer is location, location, location.

With respect to Taiwan, you start with the assumption that the PRC has "siezed" Taiwan. The same issues of combined air/sea lift that make it difficult for China to cross the straight, would make it difficult for the U.S. to liberate Taiwan if the PRC were to secure possession of the island. Repelling an invaision by the PRC would be much more logical than assuming two successful invaisions could be launched against the island. This is a fun site for PRC/Taiwan military information: http://www.emeraldesigns.com/matchup/military.shtml


31 posted on 05/20/2005 8:24:53 AM PDT by Kaisersrsic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Which side do you think Newsweak will be on? The Chicoms, of course.


32 posted on 05/20/2005 8:25:10 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Pondman88
The Chinese are biding their time until they are able to defeat us. When they are ready they will attack Taiwan and then proceed to exert hegemony over the entirety of east Asia and to whatever extent possible the rest of Asia and the Pacific.

Their current ploy is to obtain US and western technology through trade agreements and providing cheap labor for the design and production of goods. Once they are ready they will declare all the factories and technology properties of the Chinese government. We will likely have the choice of going to war or losing all access to Asia. If we choose not to go to war it will likely come to us.
33 posted on 05/20/2005 8:25:54 AM PDT by etlib (No creature without tentacles has ever developed true intelligence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: etlib

I agree.


34 posted on 05/20/2005 8:27:05 AM PDT by Icthus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

I don't think there could be a conventional war between us. It would quickly go nuclear.


Naw, I think India and Pakistan would step in and get us to negotiate with one another. ;)


35 posted on 05/20/2005 8:27:26 AM PDT by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ComtedeMaistre; All

I have often wondered what the real motives were behind Bush's turning a blind eye towards illegal immigration, and why he and others are for some sort of amnesty plan.

Could it be that, sometime down the road, they think that we will need all the extra bodies to build a military large enough to engage China in a conventional war, if need be?


36 posted on 05/20/2005 8:27:38 AM PDT by need_a_screen_name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: etlib

Their current ploy is to obtain US and western technology through trade agreements and providing cheap labor for the design and production of goods. Once they are ready they will declare all the factories and technology properties of the Chinese government. We will likely have the choice of going to war or losing all access to Asia. If we choose not to go to war it will likely come to us.

Man! Can you imagine if Hillary were pres. for all of this!


37 posted on 05/20/2005 8:29:01 AM PDT by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Double_in_a_bight

What I find interesting, is that Carter gave away the Panama canal to Panama. They in turn turned it over to China to manage since they are unable. Now, we have Chinese military in Mexico??? Wow, all I have to say, is Thank you Mr. Carter. The WORST president or at least the second worst in recent history.


38 posted on 05/20/2005 8:30:00 AM PDT by television is just wrong (http://heidisblogs.blogspot.com/ (visit blogs, visit ads).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Which side will Newsweek [the MSM] be on?

That's a rhetorical question, right?

39 posted on 05/20/2005 8:30:08 AM PDT by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Bingo. How many torpedos do we have, and how many submarines do (or will) the Chinese have?

IMHO we'll never go to war over Taiwan. What's the point?


40 posted on 05/20/2005 8:31:09 AM PDT by tgusa (USN A-6 pilot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-248 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson