Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Transcript of Glenn Beck Interview with Ken Mullinax (Re: Starving Mae)
aclearvoice.org ^ | 4-9-05 | Transcript of Interview

Posted on 04/10/2005 6:26:38 PM PDT by schmelvin

Ken: I’m the nephew of Mae Magouirk in LaGrange, Georgia. My family lives in Alabama. They’re from Addiston, Alabama and I live in Birmingham, Alabama and we love my aunt Mae very much and we can’t believe that, uh, she is being withheld substantial nourishment…

Glenn: Ken, tell me this, tell me the situation, uh, be, because your grandma has, your grandma had, or your aunt has a, um, a living will!

Ken: Yeah, she has a living will and the living will is not being obeyed. As a matter of fact her attending physician, Doctor Stadde of LaGrange, Georgia, said in probate court that even though Mae Magourik’s living will says tha, uh, that her nourishment and fluids should only be pulled if she’s comatose or vegetative, that he feels her life is such that it should be pulled regardless.

(snip)

Ken: And those of your listeners that are sitting by, complacent, thinking “oh, poor Terri Schindler-Schiavo.” And I was one of them last week. I said, “Oh it’s terrible, but it’s just a freak, it’s an anomaly. It couldn’t happen to us.”

The next day, it happened to us...

(snip)

Glenn: Let me ask you this Ken, let me ask you this. How did your, um, uh, how did your aunt’s uh, granddaughter get control of the situation?

Ken: How did she what?

Glenn: How did she get control. How did this happ…

Ken: Well I’ll tell you what. First of all she bluffed us. Uh, we went to the hospital in LaGrange when my aunt was first sick and Beth told my uncle, she said, “Uncle Buddy, don’t even start with me. I’ve got the medical durable power of attorney. I’m making the decisions.” And I said, “Beth, you know, we’re right here in front of your grandmother. Even though she’s on morphine, we shouldn’t talk about this. We should go out in the hall.”

We went out in the hall and we explained my mother’s in uh, she’s had a great quality of life for the last two years even though she was in a coma. [Ken's mother was only in a coma for 3 months, she is now living a normal, active life.] We can treat it without surgery. And she said, “Listen,” she said, she started crying, she said, “I’ve been praying about this and, and I’ve been praying to Jesus. Jesus has told me it’s time that grandmother went home to Jesus. She’s got glaucoma. Now she’s got a dissected aorta and her quality of life is just terrible and we just think she should just go to hospice.” And I said, “Beth, hospice is a synonym for death. We’ve got doctors who are ready to take care of her today.”

She goes, “no, I’ve got the medical power of attorney and that’s it.” So we thought our hands were tied, Glenn. A week goes by. Last Thursday my uncle and my mother independently started thinking, “this is wrong.” Since I used to be on Capitol Hill as a senior staff guy in Washington, I know my way around, so they said, “Kenny, get involved see what you can find out, we want to bring May to UAB hospital.” So I call hospice, I say to Frita the hospice nurse. I said, “what are my aunt’s vital stats at. She said, “well today, her blood pressure is 160/88 with a pulse of 84.” I said, “well that’s not so bad.” I said, “my aunt’s going to make it, isn’t she.” She says, “Oh no, your aunt’s not going to make it because we have withheld nourishment per geth…Beth Gaddy since March 28th.” She said, “I’ve been off the past few days. I’m surprised your aunt’s still alive.” I said, “What!”

Next time, I, she says, “call the hospice attorney.” I called Carol Todd, hospice attorney, ug, said “we’re going to be litigious.” She said, “let me check into it. Heard nothing all day, last Thursday, March 31st until 4 in the afternoon. Carol Todd called me up, “Oh my God, we made a mistake.” I said, “What are you talking about, mistake?” She said, “Beth has power of attorney, but it’s only financial, not medical durable power of attorney. And guess what? Your aunt has a living will and it says only should fluids and nourishment be withheld if she’s comatose or vegetative, she’s neither.”

I said, “Guess what, Mother, get on the phone.” Mom got on the phone. She said, “start IV fluids immediately.” They said, “we can do that.” She said, “start a temporary feeding tube just in the nose to give her nourishment and get her electrolytes back up so she can start feeding herself.” They said, “We can’t do that, you’ve gotta come in and sign the papers.” So, uh, Mom stayed here because she’s a little sick. My uncle Buddy, Aunt May’s brother and I went, the three hours from our homes to LaGrange, Georgia from our homes in Alabama. Hospice attorney Carol Todd was to meet us at 10 o’clock. She didn’t show up and the hospice head nurse talked to us, “oh, she needs to die. You know, the life’s over, no quality of life.”

And finally, we listened to this for about an hour and a half, and I said, “This is B.S. We want my aunt out of here now. I have world-class doctor Raed Agel of UAB’s cardiovascular unit arranging life-saver helicopter.” They kept inching us on out, Glenn, until Carol Todd the hospice attorney showed up and gave us a piece of paper. Turns out hospice had told Beth Gaddy the granddaughter that we were coming over, that she no longer had durable power of attorney and she went before the probate judge that morning and got a temporary emergency guardianship.

(snip)

Glenn: Oh, I gotta tell you, you can go to all the law schools, you say everybody on the Supreme Court, everybody on the 11th circuit court, everybody down in Florida, they all passed the bar and I gotta tell you man. Just because you went to school and, and passed the bar and you are an attorney and then you become a judge, doesn’t mean that you have common sense. I’m sick of these judges, man, sick to death of these judges. So let me ask you, did they put, did they, so they didn’t put the feeding tube back in. Was she, did, uh, did, how long has she been without food and water?

Ken: No, but they did have an IV in that we ordered on last Thursday and it was in her Friday, April 1st. But when the hospice person gave us this emergency decree from the probate judge, they took the IV liquids out right in front of us.

(snip)

Glenn: But, how much, how much time does she have?

Ken: That’s why I couldn’t wait on this compromise. It was supposed to be 24 hours from Monday. I waited all the way till Thursday. But how much time does she have? I don’t know. Because she’s 81 and the worst thing about it, you know, it’s bad that she’s not getting adequate nourishment or adequate fluids, but this is a little thing that, that may not mean anything to anybody but me or my aunt. But she, she has glaucoma. She can’t produce tears. She has to take drops to keep her eyes lubricated. She hasn’t had those drops in the last two weeks. She’s blind practically now. Opening her eyes is, is a terrible pain. And they won’t give her the drops.

(snip)

You can read the entire interview here:

http://www.aclearvoice.org/archives/2005/04/transcript_of_g.php


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: feedingtube; glennbeck; hospice; kenmullinax; maemagouirk; magouirk; terrischiavo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-160 next last
To: BykrBayb

Someone needs to take a close look at the granddaughter.


61 posted on 04/10/2005 9:04:26 PM PDT by Valin (The Problem with Reality is the lack of background music)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Sandy

I had heard that they were keeping Mae sedated and that she was lucid and able to speak for herself before this whole ordeal, IIRC.

eeevil conservative is the one who knows the most about this. She talked to the judge and the family face-to-face, and she spoke to people at the hospice.


62 posted on 04/10/2005 9:06:37 PM PDT by schmelvin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

Sorry, but I don't understand your comment. Terri didn't have a living will as far as I know.


63 posted on 04/10/2005 9:07:21 PM PDT by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: supercat

GREAT JOB!!!!!!


64 posted on 04/10/2005 9:08:32 PM PDT by eeevil conservative (Don't Change Minds, Change Lives! Sherri Reese)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: eeevil conservative

Sandy has some questions in post #53 that I'm sure you are better able to answer than I am.


65 posted on 04/10/2005 9:10:25 PM PDT by schmelvin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: schmelvin

I have talked with Kenneth everyday since THursday-- until today-- I knew he would be busy-- between others calling, etc- and both his mom and Mae ing the hospital..

I figured that I would not hound him-- now that Mae is out of hospice-- my calls are just out of curiosity-- I have emailed him and I will call him tomorrow- and clue you all in RIGHT away.

I know we are all wanting to know how Mae and his mom are doing-- but he needs a break-- I am just trying to show respect-- but I never actually talked with him face-to-face I hope I never mislead anyone on that...


66 posted on 04/10/2005 9:12:35 PM PDT by eeevil conservative (Don't Change Minds, Change Lives! Sherri Reese)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Wneighbor
http://www.hospicepatients.org/terri-schiavo-10-12-02-press-rel.html TERRI PHOTO 2002 (Snip) GRAND RAPIDS, MI - October 15, 2002 - Terri Schiavo currently is being held in a Pinellas County Florida hospice that is not licensed to provide care for the chronically ill. Terri Schiavo is a non-terminal disabled patient with brain damage. Terri's own treating physician, Dr. Vincent Gambone, testified before the court,saying "her condition is one that there is no recovery. The damage that is done to the brain is not repairable."1 However, the chronically disabled are by definition not going to recover completely. These are not terminal patients, and the disabled can live many years so long as they are not intentionally killed.
67 posted on 04/10/2005 9:13:25 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Proud to be an Aussie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks
I have noticed how several Freepers have argued on the side of the 'Right to Die' and much of their opinion has been shaped by personal experience, some have allied themselves to the death lobby only because of a certain amount of guilt they feel for allowing a relative to be admitted to a hospice...They fight tooth and claw to justify their own actions

I noticed that too.

68 posted on 04/10/2005 9:14:30 PM PDT by shhrubbery! (The 'right to choose' = The right to choose death --for somebody else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: schmelvin

Can't believe the knuckleheads here who condemn Gaddy on hearsay evidence. Mullinax lied about Mae being starved and dehyderated all last week.


69 posted on 04/10/2005 9:15:11 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wneighbor

Since you have contacts in the nursing home industry, please stop by and read this specific post. This is not just a hospice issue. Nursing homes are also in the viatical business.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1371538/posts?page=339#339


70 posted on 04/10/2005 9:16:06 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: schmelvin

Here is a point by point run down of how things unfolded-- BY KEN:

Ken Mullinax

Thanks for providing me the opportunity to address the following:

1. The world class cardiologist is Dr. Raed Aqel, M.D. who is at UAB's Kirkland Clinic. Dr Aqel is now my Aunt's Attending Physician at UAB and is seeing my Mom at UAB hospital as her cardiologist.

2.Two weeks-nourishment: That date comes from the fact that Mae was put in the Hospital on around March 13 and was immediately in such pain that Morphine was administered and thus she could not feed her self and thus obtained no substantial nourishment. She was admitted to Hospice on March 22 and from that point on, she only took in ice chips and jello on a sporadic basis and limited water via a syringe when if they ascertained she was unable or unwilling to take ensure or fluids orally, they should have proactively, in my opinion and according to the provisions of her living will, be administered such via an IV and nasal feeding tube.

3. Regardless of Judge Boyd says, Mae was denied nourishment and water because she was not lucid from the drugs and her lack of lucidity which only occurred AFTER ADMISSION TO THE HOSPICE AND therefore could not request them OR IMBIBE THEM on her own volition.

4.The food, Boyd said she took at Hospice, is not what we call greatnourishment...small amounts of ice chips and a few spoonfuls of jello. I would like to see anyone would feel on a daily diet of a half small bowl of orange jello, one cup of ice chips and maybe 100cc's of water administered via syringe, when someone got around to giving it to her. Anyone's electrolyte level, lucidity and cognitive abilities be effected at this point?

5. The fact that Mae is not at Hospice now shows that all three doctors, two in LaGrange and one at UAB, concurred that Mae should be further evaluated to see if a course of action could be followed to give her a chance at a quality of life. Judge Boyd will substantiate the fact that an independent neurologist did in fact examine Mae on either Thursday or Friday of this week and determined that her vitals showed that her brain was still functioning, that her neurological activity, swallowing functions, eyes and other vitals were still functioning. Dr. Aqel suggested this to DR.'s Gore and Brennan andthey concurred and thus, a neurologist evaluated Mae. There report was subsequently submitted to Judge Boyd. Dr. Aqel said that the neurological exam greatly aided all three doctors in determining that Mae was a viable candidate for further proactive medical treatment and/or evaluation.

6. Dr. Aqel, who is my Mom's cardiologist for the last few years, and also my Uncle Buddy McLeod's cardiologist (all three siblings, Mae, Lonnie Ruth, Buddy - ALL suffer from aortic dissections and problems) and now my Aunt Mae's attending Physician at UAB (Dr. Aqel) told me and my brother Jon yesterday that Mae is SO DEHYDRATED after her stay at Hospice LaGrange, that it will take at least two days of intense hydration therapy to get her back to a level that is acceptable to him.

7. Carol Todd (Hospice in house lawyer) called my Mom on March 31 and told her and I (on the phone) what was going on. A Hospice nurse was also on the phone when Carol Todd called and tried to dissuade my Mom from requesting either an IV for fluids and/or a feeding tube for substantial nourishment. After Mom listened to them, as the closet living next of kin (after it was discovered that Hospice had wrongly assumed that Beth Gaddy's power of attorney was a medical-durable P.O.A. when in fact from Mae's hospitalization date until March 31, Beth did not have such power and only held a financial P.O.A./and the fact that they also did not closely examine my Aunt's Living Will, specifically the covenants which state "nourishment/fluids shall BE DENIED ONLY IF I am comatose or vegetative"), my Mom ordered Hospice, via Carol Todd to begin hydration via an IV post haste and requested a feeding tube. Ms. Todd said they could do an IV that evening, once they passed Mom's request on to a Doctor who would order such "and one did and an IV was inserted that evening" but Todd told us we would have to show up at Hospice and sign papers to get a feeding tube inserted in her nose and if we did so, Hospice would no longer consider her as a viable candidate for Hospice.

We told Todd great, because we never considered Mae as someone who should be in Hospice since she was never said to be terminal. Well, someone notified Beth Gaddy Thursday that we were coming over the next day, Friday, April 1, to sign Mae's papers for a feeding tube and to move her to UAB- because when we showed up Friday at Hospice, they stalled us from moving her "a Hospice head nurse did) and when we were fed up with her trying to persuade us of all the reasons we should let go of Mae and allow her to die at Hospice and told her and even had Dr. Aqel call her so as to begin the process of emergency air transport to UAB medical center, then and only then did CarolTodd, Hospice's lawyer, arrive and served us with the court papers Beth Gaddy obtained via Judge Boyd which superseded by Mom and Uncle Buddy, who are Mae's closest living next of kin-and thus had herself appointed as the temporary Guardian who therefore could and did make the medical decision to both keep Mae in Hospice and pull out her IV tube for fluids and reversed our decision to insert a nasal feeding tube....the horror thus began for us.

8. Our attorney Jack Kirby proposed a compromise settlement (and he was smart doing so because it now has Mae out of Hospice and in a real world class medical facility) on our behalf Monday, April 4, when we realized, via his negative actions toward our agruments before him in open court on April 2, 2005, that Judge Boyd was going to rule for Beth and against our petition for guardianship...(one such instance was Boyd denying our attorney, Jack Kirby from cross examining Dr. Stout-Mae's attending physician -from answering his question of whether Stout would agree that there are differentcourses of treatment for a dissected aorta other than surgery..."thisargument was used by Beth and Stout..

9. They stated rightly that Mae was not a candidate for surgery, that is true, however neither was my Mom, Mae's sister who has a similar aortic condition - the whole reason we have Dr. Aqel involved is that he treated Mae's sister, my mom, Lonnie Ruth......WITHOUT surgery for a dissected aorta, successfully, with treatment and drugs when Mom's aorta dissected on October 12, 2002 and when the same problem occurred on October 12, 2003 and UAB's doctors are AGAIN treating my Mom for another dissection which occurred this past Thursday evening on April 7, 2005...matter of fact, Mom is doing so well (the dissection now has occurred in her Iliac artery(It's the artery which shoots off the aorta from the groin to either leg), that she has now been moved from CICU "Cardiac Intensive Care Unit" at UAB to a private room. Dr. Aqel is also acting, as always, as my Mom's cardiologist and as Mae's attending. Mae is now just one floor above my Mom's hospital room.

Note: Dr. Stout, Mae's attending Dr. in LaGrange, said in so many words that he would ignore Mae's Living Will since he felt her quality of life and outlook for recovery was grim at best. However, it seems that the panel of three doctors thought there must be a chance because they reported back to Judge Boyd, according to the settlement our lawyer, Jack Kirby crafted and wrote for the court, and Mae is now in UAB Medical Center.

10. In Judge Boyd's court decree order(Civil Action, Estate 138-05, dated April, 2005) it states:

"The guardian shall see that Dr. Brennan, Dr. Gore, Dr. Aqel evaluate/and or examine the ward (Mae Magouirk) for the purpose of determining whether any medical treatment should be pursued for her aortic aneurism. If at least two of the three doctors agree that there is a viable course of treatment for the aortic aneurism, then, in that event, the petitioner(Beth Gaddy) shall follow the recommendation of the doctors who agree to such a course of treatment, including the location and manner of treatment to be provided."

11. So by Mae being at UAB Medical Center that fact alone supports our contention that Mae DID NOT BELONG IN HOSPICE....was not terminal or comatose or vegetative and the three doctors agree that a course of treatment SHOULD BE PURSUED.

In closing, that is all Mae's Alabama family seeks...if the Doctors treat her and her lucidity is not reinstated, then we would be fine with her being in a nursing home...or she is welcome in either our home or Uncle Buddy McLeod's home...matter of fact, why not sitters in her home?
WE are comfortable with Mae being ANYWHERE BUT HOSPICE as long as she is not terminal and as long as she proactively receive the proper nutrition she must have, either orally or via a tube and/or IV.

Note, we Mullinax's are not adverse to Hospice when it is used properly for the purpose in which it was created. I left my career in Washington, DC to come back home to Alabama and help my dadKen, Sr. die at home with Hospice from 200 until July 10, 2002. In 1990, we obtained Hospice to help my grandmother, Mae's mom, Ora Ethel McLeod, die at home with Hospice. Additionally in 1994, my dad's brother Lynn Mullinax, left his home in NYC and moved in with my Mom and Dad so he wouldn't die alone and we used Hospice at our home for uncle Lynn....however, the major difference between my Aunt Mae Magouirk and the three cases of Hospice with my Grandmother,Dad and Uncle Lynn is that ALL THREE OF THEM WERE TERMINAL!

And even though they were terminal and some were very infirm, we ALWAYS SAW THEY HAD A GOOD INTAKE OF SUBSTANTIAL NOURISHMENT AND FLUIDS.

Aunt Mae is not terminal as evidenced by the panel of 3 doctors who have moved her to UAB medical center. She was never comatose or vegetative and her Living Will has never fully been honored.

ALL WE ASK IS THAT SHE RECEIVES THE BEST MEDICAL TREATMENT AVAILABLE...AND THAT IF SHE IS NOT ABLE TO DO SO HERSELF WITHOUT DIFFICULTY, THAT THE MEDICAL PERSONAL PROACTIVELY INSURE SHE IMBIBES the proper amount of daily minerals, vitamins and NOURISHMENT / FLUID - substantial meaning either adequately balanced meals or enough ensure, fluids or if she is unable or unwilling to take orally, IV fluids and a nasal feeding tube to make sure she has the proper nutrients, vitamins and minerals to allow her to remain alive.

Be it at home, in a hospital or a nursing home or in one of our homes...she needs help and thank the good Lord she is finally receiving it via Doctor Aqel at UAB.

Kenneth Mullinax


71 posted on 04/10/2005 9:16:06 PM PDT by eeevil conservative (Don't Change Minds, Change Lives! Sherri Reese)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia; Wneighbor

Adding the P.C. disclaimer to my post, Not all hospices and nursing homes are bad...just something to keep in mind.


72 posted on 04/10/2005 9:17:21 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: supercat

Spot on. Why not print that comment on this thread?


73 posted on 04/10/2005 9:17:47 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Proud to be an Aussie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich

you are being so silly!

read post # 71!


74 posted on 04/10/2005 9:18:45 PM PDT by eeevil conservative (Don't Change Minds, Change Lives! Sherri Reese)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: eeevil conservative

Oops, sorry about that, I knew you were in close contact with him, though.

You are right to give him some space. He needs to concentrate on taking care of Mae's needs right now.

The question Sandy had was about why Mae was not able to speak for herself while she was in the hospice. I had heard that it was because she was kept sedated, but I thought you might know more about that from talking to Ken.


75 posted on 04/10/2005 9:19:37 PM PDT by schmelvin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Sandy

See #71


76 posted on 04/10/2005 9:23:02 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Proud to be an Aussie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: schmelvin

I think post 71 answers all this...

In my opinion anyway...

She was DRUGGED UP!

She was prepared for death...

sad--

BUT VICTORY CAME!

thank you so much for your kindness..

You are one classy Freeper!


77 posted on 04/10/2005 9:23:04 PM PDT by eeevil conservative (Don't Change Minds, Change Lives! Sherri Reese)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: eeevil conservative

I don't believe Mulliinax. All last week he and WND said she was completely without nutrition and fluids. That wasn't true. The truth will come out. I understand Judge Boyd is doing some posting on another website to clear up the confusion. I'll wait until Gaddy has her say.


78 posted on 04/10/2005 9:24:47 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: schmelvin; Sandy

Nevermind, eeevil conservative. Post #71 answers that question. Thanks.


79 posted on 04/10/2005 9:25:29 PM PDT by schmelvin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich

fine with me..


80 posted on 04/10/2005 9:25:44 PM PDT by eeevil conservative (Don't Change Minds, Change Lives! Sherri Reese)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson