Posted on 03/24/2005 9:09:56 AM PST by davidosborne
Breaking News
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
I'm not against doing something - I just want it done within a lawful structure, and I don't think demanding that the Bush brothers seize control "or else" is productive.
Thank you for satisfying my expectations.
Now you've done it. I'm going to leave this thread and go work on my boat. The ice is almost off the lakes here (wishful thinking) and I need to get ready.
You may even have three helpings...but please, be careful of the bones! LOL
Call DCF NOW! Phone: (850) 487-1111
As a journalist, I probably would be there, with my camera and tape recorder. I hate to make the claim since it is so easy to do when I obviously cannot go.
OH GOODIE. Alright, enough, jokes can get old.
OK - so Jeb rushes in and grabs her - and then has 3-4 days of review time - before greer can then vacate it and order the re-taking of Terri and taking the tube out again - and Terri's suffering and murder is prolonged. You want that? (THAT would be "for show") If he can act and be assured that this wont happen - he will.... thank your lucky stars you aren't in the position of trying to save her only to end up prolonging her agony. I believe he's trying to find an avenue that assures she can be rescued with being taken back in 3-4 days - thus prolonging this barbaric murder?
Good post, 1.
Thanks for posting that.
LOL
No, the problem is that those powers were ceded long ago, by other people. The tyranny of the judiciary did not happen overnight; it has been growing for many a long year now, unopposed, and it's not going to be undone in a day. The Bushes would end up impeached and/or in jail for what you are suggesting, the country would be torn apart, and our enemies would strike.
The fight lies with us. It is time for Americans to do everything possible to shake this judicial tyrant off our backs. But the day after Terri dies, everybody is going to forget this, and it will be back to judicial tyranny as usual. Next stop, gay "marriage" imposed on all the states, euthanasia for infants that survive abortions, the removal of all (Christian and Jewish) religious symbols not only from public buildings but from view, etc.
http://hyscience.typepad.com/hyscience/2005/02/michael_schiavo_1.html Has this there:
In May of 1992, at the apex of the romance, Schiavo had Terri’s 2 pet cats euthanized to clear the way for his moving in with Cindy and her pet dog.
ALSO right here on FR...look for 'Cats' in the paragraph:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1367193/posts Source for this post:
http://www.bluestarbase.org/stanley031805.htm
True. Even a lot of folks in here think that one of the Bush's should storm the place. My instincts would LOVE to see someone storm the place. That's just human nature, but the fact is that storming the place would do nothing but perpetrate more evil.
This is so stupid. Just send in people go get her and arrest that stinking judge and another Marvin that tries to top them.
In the Old Testament there are a number of prominent examples of civil disobedience. In Exodus 1 and 2, when Pharaoh commanded the Hebrew midwives to kill all male Hebrew babies, they lied to Pharaoh and did not carry out his command.
The book of Daniel has a number of instructive examples. In Daniel 3, for example, Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego refused to bow down to the golden image and were cast into the fiery furnace.
In Daniel 6 the commissioners and satraps had King Darius make a decree that no one could make a petition to any god or man for thirty days. Daniel nevertheless continued to pray to God three times a day and was cast into the lion's den.
The most dramatic example of civil disobedience in the New Testament can be found in Acts 4 and 5. When Peter and John were commanded not to preach the gospel, their response was, "We must obey God rather than men" (Acts 5:29).
Notice that in each of these examples there are at least two common elements. First, there was a direct, specific conflict between God's law and man's law....
Second, in choosing to obey God's higher law, believers paid the normal consequence for disobedience.
It make me wonder. Or worry may be a better word.
Look. I don't know what the right answer here is. There is no perfect solution. I hate seeing her in her current condition and I don't know if I would want to be maintained that way, but starving her to death is flat out wrong.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.