Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Schiavo Appeal Has Been Filed
Fox News

Posted on 03/22/2005 6:13:43 AM PST by sonsofliberty2000

per Fox


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clausvonschiavo; deathocrats; dothewillofgod; euthanasia; godhelpus; goodforgopin06; governmentinstrusion; judicaltyranny; judicialcoup; medicalmurder; meninblack; parentsrights; politcalgain; schiavo; t4; terri; terrischiavo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 901-920921-940941-960 ... 1,681-1,696 next last
To: cdefreese

It is one of the biggest myths.

The other judges didnt hear anyhing. They issues summary rulings/dimissals.


921 posted on 03/22/2005 10:36:24 AM PST by atruelady (Life Support...the OTHER , other white meat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 914 | View Replies]

To: offduty

It was for the judge to determine the credibility of the witnesses. And since Michael's brother and s-i-l have no dog in this fight, they look to be "independent" witnesses (which is not to say they are not biased...again, for the court to determine).


922 posted on 03/22/2005 10:36:54 AM PST by ContemptofCourt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 915 | View Replies]

To: cdefreese

Greer is the only judge who heard the case on the "merits" or "evidence." The case kept being appealed, but appeals judges look not at "evidence" but at procedure. All the appeals courts merely said that Greer was correct and there was no procedural grounds to challenge his findings "of fact." so the U.S. Congress wanted a new trial to begin in the Tampa district court, but Congress did not clarify what it wanted, and this clintoid judge has essentially struck down the March 21 law.


923 posted on 03/22/2005 10:36:56 AM PST by Theodore R. (Why does the GOP continue to fiddle while Terri burns?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 914 | View Replies]

To: Libertina
How could ANY person "rule" to starve another to death?

They can't, legally. The charade is that the patient chose to starve to death, by saying "no extraordinary medical procedure." That term of art includes feeding tube.

924 posted on 03/22/2005 10:37:32 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 889 | View Replies]

To: northernlightsII

That would be up to Attorney General and potential governor Crist, another of those Pinellas-area "moderate" Republicans who has shown no interest in this case and marches lockstep with George W. Greer.


925 posted on 03/22/2005 10:38:17 AM PST by Theodore R. (Why does the GOP continue to fiddle while Terri burns?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 919 | View Replies]

To: ContemptofCourt
First you answer my question with the argument that 'the Judge heard the arguments and decided'. Next your feign you don't understand my question. Finally, you repeat your first response. You have put your faith, and this woman's life, in the subjective opinion of one judge.

We disagree, and the 'evidence' I see and hear on the news that attests to this woman's awareness of family members around her is far more compelling than anything you've provided supporting the judge here. You are not up to defending his decision, and your correct if you think I didn't expect you to convince me, though I was sincere when I asked someone to try. I do not understand the culture of death being tolerated in this case.
926 posted on 03/22/2005 10:38:29 AM PST by Magnum44 (Terrorism is a disease, precise application of superior force is the ONLY cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 876 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Good point. But when the patient can't speak for herself, who has the right to make that decision. That's what this entire mess is about.


927 posted on 03/22/2005 10:38:40 AM PST by Jotmo ("Voon", said the mattress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 846 | View Replies]

To: atruelady

I know what you mean. We "escaped" liberal New Jersey to come down here - But it looks like liberal New Jersey followed us! This all disgusts me and I want to do something!


928 posted on 03/22/2005 10:39:31 AM PST by Jennifer in Florida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 905 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
You decide for you, your wife makes her decision and you're more than likely safe to have your wishes carried out. Terri had no living will or durable power-of-attorney so her HINO will decide for her despite the fact that she was a practicing Catholic, etc. And his decision backed up by the FL courts is to starve her. Explain to me why any other husband who wishes to rid himself of his invalid wife who is unable to speak for herself and has no living will can't dump her in a FL hospice and have her starved? Why not a defective child since the parent is the child's guardian?

And you think this is fine?

929 posted on 03/22/2005 10:39:53 AM PST by penowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 752 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44

Mag: The FL law put this case in the hands of that one judge and told him to make a decision. Tough beans if you don't like the decision he made.


930 posted on 03/22/2005 10:40:25 AM PST by ContemptofCourt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 926 | View Replies]

To: 7.62 x 51mm
I turned my political activism towards ebay. First I tried to report it as a violation of ebay policy although I'm not sure. It came back with an invalid item #. I went to the official ebay site and entered the item # and it is still open.

Finally, I just entered a bunch of junk and got to the part where you can email them, so I did. I will watch and see if they allow the auction to stand.

You have to sign on to ebay to email them. You have to click on the help tab and jump through a lot of hoops until you get the email link.

931 posted on 03/22/2005 10:40:32 AM PST by Aliska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 825 | View Replies]

To: cdefreese

Greer determined what evidence would be allowed in the court record. Much of the 'pro' Terri/Scindler evidence was NOT allowed.
All subsequent courts and judges that looked into this case STIPULATED to (accepted) the Greer court's evidence without review or without hearing any further evidence. This is my understanding...
Sooooo, those 19(this is the # that liberals use--I don't know the truth of this!) judges have only reconsidered proceedural/legal issues NOT the evidence (or the evidence that was NOT allowed...)


932 posted on 03/22/2005 10:41:01 AM PST by krunkygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 914 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
The charade is that the patient chose to starve to death, by saying "no extraordinary medical procedure." That term of art includes feeding tube.

Succinct. What's scary to me in all of this is that "extraordinary medical procedures" and being kept alive by "artificial means" now includes food and water. We should be concerned that the judiciary considers us all to be alive by "artificial means," and that someone with "custody" of us on paper can decide to starve us to death.

933 posted on 03/22/2005 10:41:36 AM PST by Types_with_Fist (I'm on FReep so often that when I read an article at another site I scroll down for the comments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 924 | View Replies]

To: atruelady

You'll love it here! Truly. (I'm a reformed northerner)

Just stay out of Travis county....


934 posted on 03/22/2005 10:41:39 AM PST by Zechariah_8_13 (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 905 | View Replies]

To: Boardwalk

Don't know that. Even if he had assualted her and that is what brought on the "heart attack" --- I've seen murderers take such trophies in some perversion of "love". At that point maybe he didn't yet want her fully dead.


935 posted on 03/22/2005 10:41:53 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 884 | View Replies]

To: Jotmo

Is there a particular reason why you're getting so edgy over this topic? I mean, Terri's life doesn't mean anything to you, does it, so why are you getting emotionally involved?


936 posted on 03/22/2005 10:41:59 AM PST by blurb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 917 | View Replies]

To: ContemptofCourt
Cboldt: Keep in sharp focus that this is about TERRI's wishes. In that regard, Michael is only the holder of evidence that may or may not represent TERRI's wishes.

ContemptofCourt: Wrong.

How so? Notice I didn't say Michael was the only witness, I said tha his role in the task of determining Terri's wishes is the role of a witness.

937 posted on 03/22/2005 10:42:05 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 902 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

You are correct. Thanks for the clarification.


938 posted on 03/22/2005 10:42:35 AM PST by Jotmo ("Voon", said the mattress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 867 | View Replies]

To: nmh

Not to get this off focus, I just honestly believe that our prayers affirm our faith and God gave us the power and choice to make things happen.

I don't believe God will come down and fix things for Terri. He leaves the ability and choices up to us.


939 posted on 03/22/2005 10:42:43 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
The Schindlers didn't ASK for a de novo examination. A judge can only rule on the motions actually submitted.

Nice try.

Santorum: Terri Ruling Defied Congress

940 posted on 03/22/2005 10:43:00 AM PST by Gritty ("...a woman's 'right to choose' what? To have her baby harmed by an assailant?-Rich Lowry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 835 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 901-920921-940941-960 ... 1,681-1,696 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson