Skip to comments.
Apple Releases OSX.3.7 - update.
Apple Computer ^
| 12/14/2004
Posted on 12/16/2004 1:45:25 AM PST by Swordmaker
About Mac OS X Update
Mac OS X is the worlds most advanced operating system, blending the power and stability of UNIX with the legendary simplicity and ease-of-use of the Macintosh. Mac OS X version 10.3 Panther contains over 150 new features and provides significant enhancements to its modern, UNIX-based foundation.
Whats New in this Version
The 10.3.7 Update delivers enhanced functionality and improved reliability for Mac OS X v10.3 Panther and is recommended for all users.
Key enhancements include:
- improved AFP support for saving documents with long file names
- improved OpenGL technology and updated ATI and NVIDIA graphics drivers
- improved FireWire device compatibility
- updated Preview application
- improved compatibility for third party applications
- previous standalone security updates
For detailed information on this Update, please visit this website:Apple Update to 10.3.7
TOPICS: Announcements; Technical
KEYWORDS: apple; lowqualitycrap; mac; macintosh; macuser; osx; update
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 201-216 next last
To: Swordmaker
Ran the software update on my three Macs....all run OK with no problems noted.
61
posted on
12/16/2004 7:32:19 AM PST
by
afnamvet
To: stockpirate
I heard a good one this morning that you might want to use in your next brouhaha (brouhaha? ha ha ha)
I was proudly proclaiming my purchase of a dual-processor G5 this morning, and a former Gateway employee who now works in my office said, "So it needs two, does it?"
62
posted on
12/16/2004 7:33:56 AM PST
by
SlowBoat407
(Couldn't you have stopped shooting at us and watched your baby grow instead?)
To: Swordmaker
In some cases, downloading and installing the Combo update is more better. It's already up.
63
posted on
12/16/2004 7:36:09 AM PST
by
savedbygrace
("No Monday morning quarterback has never led a team to victory" GW Bush)
To: SlowBoat407; stockpirate
I don't completely buy the "Betamax was superior" line for two reasons. The first and most obvious one to VCR users was that Betamax didn't hold as much as VHS, thus making VHS superior in a fairly important way, especially when tapes cost $20 and the best VHS recording speed was 2 hours. But even if you just look at quality, the Betamax machine moves the tape, in a serpentine way, past the heads (in a sort of "B" shape without the back bar, thus the name). The problem with that is tape wear. If you've ever seen old Betamax tapes, they'd get sparkly drop-outs where the magnetic material flaked off of the tape because of how it was being wound through the heads. So perhaps with a pristine tape and a short program, Betamax was superior but people wanted longer recording times and there were certainly some quality issues, at least with the tapes of that day, in the long haul.
To: pageonetoo
Having had a spouse and two friends work for MacWarehouse, let's just say that we buy our Mac stuff from just about any other vendor...
To: shibumi
If you want a desktop and want something cheap, take a look at the eMac or new iMac (if you want a G5 64-bit processor and a small desktop footprint). But I really suggest you take a look at the iBook, even if you don't currently have a laptop. It's a rock-solid laptop that's competatively priced with similarly equipped PC laptops (and quite possibly a better deal than most). The new iBooks have a G4 processor and 32MB of video RAM which would hold you over. It also has one of the best wireless networking antennas around built in (you can add wireless networking as an option). The Apple Safari browser also does a good job of blocking pop-ups and other annoying web tricks but they also include a copy of Internet Explorer for the Mac if you really need it for something. They also give you a great email client that has features for tagging spam and such.
If you need Microsoft Office for any reason and decide to buy a Mac, see if you can find a place that will offer you a special deal on Office for the Mac (the high-end version also includes a Windows emulator so that you can run Windows software, in an emulator window, on your Mac). Office works really well on the Mac and I've only noticed one minor and obscure incompatability with the Windows version (having to do with how Windows and Macs handle end-of-line characters). Despite my dislike of Microsoft's operating system, Office is worth having if you do a lot of word processing or work with spreadsheets. If you don't, Apple's AppleWorks includes word processing and spreadsheet functionality.
To: Question_Assumptions
You are correct about the tape handling aspect. Matsushita got the transport right. However, the image processing electronics for Beta were superior, producing an image resolution of about 300 lines vs VHS 240 IIRC.
Interestingly enough, every format Panasonic has produced in the last 10 years has been half-inch, since they already have a solid mechanism for it. Why mess with success?
67
posted on
12/16/2004 8:38:54 AM PST
by
SlowBoat407
(Couldn't you have stopped shooting at us and watched your baby grow instead?)
To: SlowBoat407
Higher resolution was what LDs were for. I think most of the LD players were running in the 400-425 line range and produced output so bright that I saw my old one cause VCRs and TVs to "gray out" on screens that were totally white because they couldn't handle the brightness. And because I actually had an LD player in the 1980s, I have a copy of the first Star Wars trilogy, in crisp widescreen LD format, without all of the "improvements" on the DVD courtesy of George Lucas.
To: stockpirate
As a I wrote, why would someone waste the time to create a virus that will onlyattack 6 machines out of every 500 computers. That's a potential infected base of over 10 million systems -- systems often directly marketed to the first timer, "I know nothing of computers or security" crowd. Why pass up that?
To: shibumi
After two years with my trusty, no freezes, no worms, no viruses, no problem iMAC G4, I have done the download and am happy as a clam in hot sauce. And it plays the great music of the world while I read FR on the big 17 incher too! My most sincere condolences to PC owners, but it's Christmas and one should be benevolent. My cousins with PCs are included in this wish, but they are so busy, they tell me, curing PC glitches they hardy have time to enjoy the Season.
To: stockpirate
What big internet servers are Macs?http://www.army.mil/
They switched to Mac a few years ago because of security problems with their previous Windows server.
To: Brett S281E
So if you want a mac just send your money to Moveon.org or the ACLU and get it overwith Have you noticed where Bill Gates sends his money?
To: CanisMajor2002
Apache can run on just about any OS: Mac X/Linux/Unix, Novell Netware, Microsoft Windows, and some EBCDIC machines In my experience, most production Apache installs are for Linux or other 'nix variants, with Windows very low on the list.
To: antiRepublicrat
74
posted on
12/16/2004 9:52:21 AM PST
by
Paridel
To: Paridel; Brett S281E; antiRepublicrat
75
posted on
12/16/2004 9:56:21 AM PST
by
Paridel
To: Swordmaker
Do they still make that stupid one that looks like a big boob, has a non-upgradeable display and no room for internal expansion?
Think Different, indeed. Think Like a Macmoonie.
76
posted on
12/16/2004 9:58:07 AM PST
by
Hank Rearden
(Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
To: SlowBoat407
I happen to value the same things, and my amchine is just fine. The only reason I made the remarks I did today was I mentioned on another thread that I have a PC and boy the it was a Big Mac Attack, and I shouldn't leave out the Linux users too. :-)
Both systems are fine, and both have their a good points and bad points.
77
posted on
12/16/2004 10:04:23 AM PST
by
stockpirate
(Check out my homepage and learn about sKerry and his Socialist friends.)
To: antiRepublicrat
SEE all the information I can get when I play Devils advocate.....lol
78
posted on
12/16/2004 10:04:57 AM PST
by
stockpirate
(Check out my homepage and learn about sKerry and his Socialist friends.)
To: Question_Assumptions
The reason the Beta was considered better wass due to the tape speed being faster moving across the recording head. But your point about the tape flaking is right on target.
I think both have a recording wigth of 32 microns and the record angle is the same, it is just the spped of the tape passing over the head that was different and that limited the Beta to 5 hours max.
79
posted on
12/16/2004 10:13:58 AM PST
by
stockpirate
(Check out my homepage and learn about sKerry and his Socialist friends.)
To: Swordmaker
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 201-216 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson