[presidio9]

[bwteim]

Hey, I just had lunch. Actually, that looks like "Saddam switched at birth" photo....

[presidio9]

note to Helen: The accepted spelling is "al Qaeda.

[Mr. Jeeves]

LOL! When I saw the headline, I knew right away who you meant.

[ArmyBratCutie]

SEA HAG HAHAHHAHAAHAHHAHA
hey NO FAIR giving sea hags a bad name by comparing them to her/him/it....
Im always writing to her and Dowd and asking them to PLEASE, if you have to be on TV, shave those moustaches and trim that nose hair....
needless to say, I never get a responce HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[foreverfree]

bump

[mrs tiggywinkle]

Pictures of the Sea Hag are great for my diet. lol.

[leadpencil1]

[sierrahome]

Sea Hag...I knew you were talking about Helen. Growing up in the late 50's and early 60's she reminds me EXACTLY of the witch in the old WB Bugs Bunny cartoons

[ClearCase_guy]

now-disproved claims that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and links to al Qaida.

Saddam's use (actual use, mind you) of WMD is verified (ask the dead Kurds).
The UN said he had WMD
Kerry said he had WMD
Bill Clinton said he had WMD
Hillary Clinton said he had WMD

Of course the media weren't questioning their existence.

And the "links to al qaida"? The talking point was originally "links to 9/11", but has morphed to "links to al qaeda" which is funny, because the 9/11 Commission confirmed that such links did exist.

Thomas is not wrong in what she is saying -- she is lying. There's a difference.

[akorahil]

Hmmm, you may be on to something...

[cwb]

"They could have asked tougher questions about the slim evidence that the administration cited for making its now-disproved claims that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and links to al Qaida.

If the press had fulfilled the role of vigilant watchdog, it might have given the administration some pause, instead of a free ride, during the months before the March 19, 2003, invasion."

---

This is the biggest pile of dung I have ever heard. Perhaps Helen might refresh her memory and realize that the media was as much responsible for driving this war as anyone. Hell, two days after Bush's Inauguration, the NYT (with Bill Cohen) was running stories, claiming that Saddam was reconstituting its weapons facilities at specific sites.

The Washington Post was doing much the same as they were gung-ho to get this president to do something about Saddam. This media that now claims there is no Saddam/AQ connection was only too happy to print numerous stories on this dangerous relationship...well before Bush was even president. This is a joke!

[JesseHousman]

Helen has been a breath of fresh air and, by her appearance, has added a bir of beauty to otherwise drab press conferences.

I wonder if this press corps beauty has ever had a husband or some other type of sexual partner?

[small voice in the wilderness]

As many times as I have seen photos of her, you'd think by now...but no....my body still shudders...

[stockstrader]

Did they 'do their job' on the bogus, forged documents story? The fact remains that the media DESPERATELY and BLATANTLY wants Kerry to win,,,,just look at the direction Halperin gave ABC correspondents!

[Capn TrVth]

LOL -When I saw "Sea Hag" I intuitively knew you were talking about Helen Thomas...

BUMP ;>

[Freebird Forever]

I'll see your sea hag, and raise you one.

[abc1]

If the press had done its job before the battle for Iraq, they might exposed the corrupt U.N. food for oil program or the business dealings of France, Germany & Russia in Iraq.

If the U.N. had done its job TEN years ago, the war may never happened.

if if if if if if ....

[Capn TrVth]

She's "America's Yassir Arafat" ;>

[DanTheAdmin]

[RedEyeJack]

As an enabler of Bill Clinton's personal misconduct while in office, HT has no creditability to criticize anyone for anything