Posted on 10/29/2004 6:01:00 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
Friday, October 29, 2004
By Judith Reisman
© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com
Liam Neeson and Bill Condon's cover-up for mass child sexual abusers in "Kinsey" will doubtless claim several Academy Awards. This follows Academy wins in 2002 by Hollywood's favorite expat pedophile rapist, Roman Polanski.
|
So, make way for Nicole Kidman who gets equal time in pedophile promotions.
Kidman is distressed at the European response to her nude scene with a boy in her new movie, "Birth." She is even rumored to have been spat at in the streets by intolerant Italians during the Venice International Film Festival.
Oh these up tight, repressed Europeans!
What is the fuss it all about?
Kidman insists she doesn't know!
OK, so "Birth" is R-rated (perhaps for repressed). The press reports it features a "shocking scene of the Oscar-winner naked in the bathtub with a 10-year-old boy."
So what? She didn't skinny-dip in the film with her own son Connor – this was another boy.
Anyway, the boy taking a bath with the naked film star is "done in the best possible taste" she says.
Gracious! Of course!
Kidman said this was a tender scene. She is shocked, appalled, stunned that a scene with her sloshing around naked with an apparently naked almost boy lover might be seen as a sex scene.
She is quoted as saying, Oh, "It's not about sex, you know, it's certainly not about sex. It's about love, it's about being ... under the spell of somebody."
Wow! Razzle-dazzle, folks, razzle-dazzle!
In her film, Nichole is a widow who thinks the 10-year-old boy is her dead hubby. And we know that director Jonathan Glazer is not another Hollywood Polanski-like closet pedophile because he says he "never set out to make a salacious film."
There you are. Still, the film was booed and hissed at by those uptight Viennese film critics who did not understand the artistic beauty and innocence of it all.
Dirty minds, really!
In one scene, Nichole "tenderly kisses" the boy-who-is-her-dead-hubby, played by 11-year-old Canadian Cameron Bright, on the lips. In another scene, they share an ice-cream sundae and she asks him whether he has ever made love to a girl.
But this is not, we repeat, not about sex.
Then Glazer has the 10-year-old strip to slosh with Nichole in the tub.
We see Nichole's bare back and the lad waist up in the water. But we are assured, often, all is OK because he isn't naked, they say.
I, for one, am so reassured now.
Well this is not done "to exploit a young boy," Nichole says. Polanski is still stuck in France after his rape of a 13-year-old girl, and this isn't 12-year-old Brooke Shields being auctioned off for deflowering in "Pretty Baby," or Jodie Foster prostituted as a "12-year-old whore in Martin Scorsese's 'Taxi Driver.'"
Now, those innocent films were also artistic.
Nichole's film is about "loss and grief."
Director Glazer noticed that a naked woman and child in a tub was a kind of "taboo in many respects." But he sees his skinny-dipping as "sacred in a way."
The folks connected with the film say Nichole was so "careful to protect the young actor's innocence."
But why if the film was about love, not sex? Why were they so "careful?"
Nichole explains that "he never got to read the script," and in fact, that the two were filmed separately for the "bath scene."
Now, are we to just believe that all those involved in making "Birth" – as in "Kinsey" – are just naively stupid, unworldly? If so, how can they make films that so dramatically influence our lives and our culture? If they're not stupid, when do we admit that such people would use their power and influence to do evil, and that children are, for them, objects to exploit and brutalize?
Kidman says her boy-husband – who is allegedly so mature that he can play a reincarnated dead man who returns to life to lust for his wife – "just thinks it's kind of fun."
"He doesn't quite know what he's doing, which is good."
A strange defense. If, as Nichole and Glazer claim, their film is about innocent "love," why hide the script to protect the boy (and where were his parents)?
Why rejoice that, "he doesn't know what he is doing"?
In my jaundiced view, watch the theaters near you for a cadre of Kinseyan Hollywood pedophiles who know exactly what they are doing.
They are on the march – to the Academy Awards and beyond.
M. Jackson, "That's what I've been trying to tell everyone too!"
""He doesn't quite know what he's doing, which is good.""
Which makes you, Nicole, an absolute pig.
......... EXACTLY! Nicole didn't realize it, but she admits that THERE WAS something wrong about this boy playing this role otherwise she would not have made that remark. Talk about contradicting ones self. Duh for Kidman. Such a dissappointment.
I apologize for trying to discuss an adult topic with a child.
P>what an oxymoron.
I think that Jonathan Glazer is as much to blame as Ms. Kidman... if not more. Granted, Kidman probably should have refused to do the scene in the name of good taste. But Glazer, who is the one who is directing this movie, probably should not have included this scene in his movie.
Charlie Rose fawns over his own reflection complete with polo shirt with preppy flipped up collar(dork). Nauseating psychophant courtier poseur
"influences the lives of all public school children. But you would rather attack the little red-haired girl?"
Considering this topic IS ABOUT " the movie starring one Nicole Kidman yes. Want to discuss your other subjects start a new thread on them then. Is that too hard or are you not capable ie., Kidmans publicist hack
"I apologize for trying to discuss an adult topic with a child."
Cute one coming from a man that sounds like a sexually repressed Catholic priest...lots of moralizing and no brains behind it (brain fried from lack of sex).
I'd be careful around a man so stodgy and uptight as you.
They often have something to hide.
O.C. thinks Cartman's mom is hot - a genuwine Old Cracker MILF!
"The ten year old is taller."
LOL...good one!
troll, you need a life
"You would come closer as the publicist for Nicole because you favor publicity for her movie."
Nice try (twisiting circle jerkin)Hillary but no CIGAR!
The NEA and other liberal institutions draw considerable sustenance from Hollywood and the entertainment industry. The theory they use is that anything that is suitable for pursuit by adults needs to be introduced to children as part of their "education".
The NEA has made themselves substitute parents, justified by the many parents who have abdicated their responsibility for their children. It wouldn't be fair to allow neglected children to grow up not knowing how to perform oral sex, would it?
If Hollywood is forced to pay a price for perverting the values of our nation, the NEA will have little choice but to respond also. Without the liberal media, liberals are helpless.
I watch the broadcast networks seldom, the broadcast network news never, and I cancelled the subscription to my local liberal rag years ago. We must all vote with our dollars and starve the liberal monster to death.
ping for later
Go away Troll.
Oh, a "troll" am I? And have you even visited my homepage, Sunny, before you swing that silly club at me?
My conservative "creds" are laid out right there for all to see, if you've got the guts to acknowledge them.
I still don't know why uptight old fools like you insist on labeling any Republican or Libertarian who refuses to Seig Heil the FCC or bow down and worship Falwell/Robertson-type goons as being "trolls".
Every day America has to deal with socialist vermin who try to abuse the power of the government to P.C.-away my freedom of speech and my gun ownership rights. YOU try to abuse the Constitution to invade our bedrooms and mold our airwaves to your personal moral agenda.
BIG difference there, huh?
"O.C. thinks Cartman's mom is hot - a genuwine Old Cracker MILF!"
Nah! O.C.'s just ticked off the law won't let him officiate "good, ole'-fashion' shotgun weddin's for the young'uns" any more.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.