Posted on 10/29/2004 6:01:00 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
Bump and ping.
| Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.1) |
| Homosexual Keyword Search |
Let me know if you want on or off the homosexual agenda ping list.
snip...While not a thread on the homosexual agenda, it's related by watering down the evils of pedophilia.
Actually, this thread is also about the homosexual agenda because the homosexual agenda is the 'engine' to which the train cars called "pedophilia/pederasty/transgenerational love", "transsexualism {drag queens/drag kings/he-she's}, beastiality, and sado-masochism are being pulled into America's 'train-station'. The "agenda", when seen as a 'whole entity" is about the total liberation of sexual libertinism, no matter how grotesquely perverse.
Well, yes and no. As I said it was related, and since I didn't see any direct reference to homosexuality in the article I had to include a disclaimer for other purists like myself. Well, that's what the wife calls me!
Well, guess what, Nic? At that age, they NEVER "know what [they're] doing." The adults that exploit them, on the other hand, do. That's why children are so vulnerable.
That's not really news. I can't think of the last time a pedophile in a motion picture (L.I.E., Happiness, etc.) was portrayed unquestionably as a villain unless said pervert was a clergyman (Sleepers).
Nicole is lucky she's a woman.
I have written about the scandal of non-judgmental coverage of the Letourneau situation since I first signed on to FR six years ago, and my worst nightmares are becoming reality. They're talking marriage, she's a media darling, free to marry the stupid kid, and the kid -- according to People -- is living it up, apparently assured of stardom.
And there is no doubt in my mind that perverted Mary Kay will be going after other children. This is one of the first step in an agenda to legitimatize pedophilia. Nicole Kidman's sick film is another one.
let it first be said that I am firmly against sex outside of marriage and I am firmly against incest and abuse. None may not claim I am stating otherwise without biting their tongue. I know you only want what's best for your children, you are to be commended for that virtue. But I assist in warning you of a terrible error in your judgement. You are in danger of inadvertently harming them.
Affection is MORAL. Lascivious, forced sex on children is IMMORAL. Do not confuse the two. Anger and raw emotion towards previous acts of child abuse, however justified and right it is to have those emotions for the actual case of child abuse, does not constitute a moral reflection and it's no excuse for trying to obliterate something natural and healthy. If emotions are motherly and benign, then they are NOT sexual in the context hereby used. You are confusing abuse with motherly touch (essential for the emotional growth and development of a child). You are making as John put it "good, evil and evil, good". The physical neglect of a child is evil, they are both against the teachings of the Bible and anything resembling common sense. Nudism (not lust) is also the goal of a healthy, moral society. Nudism is truth, nothing concealed. Only a devil conceals. God has given us the story of Adam and Eve to show us our sin. Adam and Eve invented cloths in the warmth of paradise (without the intended purpose of preserving body heat) and in doing so they originated the dark path for mankind to follow. How can deceit (covering one's self up) and trying to deny God's gifts be a good thing, be a moral thing? What next, outlawing breast feeding because it involves physical contact between mother and child? Incriminating human beings because they are not ethereal? Incriminating those who love God because they have not neglected him in the name of his own morality? Certainly you know the answer and realize the contradiction in that last question.
These are people in a bath tub and there is no sexual abuse, right? There is no hitting, strangling, piercing, stabbing, kicking, screaming, swearing, slapping, gnawing, mangling, shooting, burning, grinding, or murder. What in the name of God, then, are you attacking? The human form? The recognition of the human form? WHY? How can you believe this? What beauty is there in mangling a child with a flogging stick or treating him like some uncontrollably promiscuous and demonic virus to be molded and crushed? Attacking the human being made in the Lord's image would seem to be evil in every sense of the word. Am I wrong about this? is this not true?
An innocent child is born evil? How can this be? If an innocent child is born with evil, born with the tendency to lust then there would be no innocence and all murder and mayhem would be the will of God. But this is not so. Right?
I am ignorant, lost, and confused within this ideal of yours. You may now challenge my statment. If you try to defame me, keep in mind that you will accomplish nothing. I am a follower of Jesus Christ, a healer of illnesses, and a believer in the redemption of mankind from original sin. Your malice will have no more affect on my thoughts and beliefs than the breath of a mewling calf. You may choose a lifetime of anger and war if you wish. That would be a truly unfruitful sacrifice of your purpose in this life. Your children need your compassion.
I am growing weary, for my fellow humans here seem to be losing their humanity. Now is the time to choose your approach: hatred, defense, or to leave it be and discover the truth on your own. I will not fail in creating a safe habitat for children all over the world to live and grow, even if others fail them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.