Posted on 10/29/2004 6:01:00 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
Friday, October 29, 2004
By Judith Reisman
© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com
Liam Neeson and Bill Condon's cover-up for mass child sexual abusers in "Kinsey" will doubtless claim several Academy Awards. This follows Academy wins in 2002 by Hollywood's favorite expat pedophile rapist, Roman Polanski.
|
So, make way for Nicole Kidman who gets equal time in pedophile promotions.
Kidman is distressed at the European response to her nude scene with a boy in her new movie, "Birth." She is even rumored to have been spat at in the streets by intolerant Italians during the Venice International Film Festival.
Oh these up tight, repressed Europeans!
What is the fuss it all about?
Kidman insists she doesn't know!
OK, so "Birth" is R-rated (perhaps for repressed). The press reports it features a "shocking scene of the Oscar-winner naked in the bathtub with a 10-year-old boy."
So what? She didn't skinny-dip in the film with her own son Connor – this was another boy.
Anyway, the boy taking a bath with the naked film star is "done in the best possible taste" she says.
Gracious! Of course!
Kidman said this was a tender scene. She is shocked, appalled, stunned that a scene with her sloshing around naked with an apparently naked almost boy lover might be seen as a sex scene.
She is quoted as saying, Oh, "It's not about sex, you know, it's certainly not about sex. It's about love, it's about being ... under the spell of somebody."
Wow! Razzle-dazzle, folks, razzle-dazzle!
In her film, Nichole is a widow who thinks the 10-year-old boy is her dead hubby. And we know that director Jonathan Glazer is not another Hollywood Polanski-like closet pedophile because he says he "never set out to make a salacious film."
There you are. Still, the film was booed and hissed at by those uptight Viennese film critics who did not understand the artistic beauty and innocence of it all.
Dirty minds, really!
In one scene, Nichole "tenderly kisses" the boy-who-is-her-dead-hubby, played by 11-year-old Canadian Cameron Bright, on the lips. In another scene, they share an ice-cream sundae and she asks him whether he has ever made love to a girl.
But this is not, we repeat, not about sex.
Then Glazer has the 10-year-old strip to slosh with Nichole in the tub.
We see Nichole's bare back and the lad waist up in the water. But we are assured, often, all is OK because he isn't naked, they say.
I, for one, am so reassured now.
Well this is not done "to exploit a young boy," Nichole says. Polanski is still stuck in France after his rape of a 13-year-old girl, and this isn't 12-year-old Brooke Shields being auctioned off for deflowering in "Pretty Baby," or Jodie Foster prostituted as a "12-year-old whore in Martin Scorsese's 'Taxi Driver.'"
Now, those innocent films were also artistic.
Nichole's film is about "loss and grief."
Director Glazer noticed that a naked woman and child in a tub was a kind of "taboo in many respects." But he sees his skinny-dipping as "sacred in a way."
The folks connected with the film say Nichole was so "careful to protect the young actor's innocence."
But why if the film was about love, not sex? Why were they so "careful?"
Nichole explains that "he never got to read the script," and in fact, that the two were filmed separately for the "bath scene."
Now, are we to just believe that all those involved in making "Birth" – as in "Kinsey" – are just naively stupid, unworldly? If so, how can they make films that so dramatically influence our lives and our culture? If they're not stupid, when do we admit that such people would use their power and influence to do evil, and that children are, for them, objects to exploit and brutalize?
Kidman says her boy-husband – who is allegedly so mature that he can play a reincarnated dead man who returns to life to lust for his wife – "just thinks it's kind of fun."
"He doesn't quite know what he's doing, which is good."
A strange defense. If, as Nichole and Glazer claim, their film is about innocent "love," why hide the script to protect the boy (and where were his parents)?
Why rejoice that, "he doesn't know what he is doing"?
In my jaundiced view, watch the theaters near you for a cadre of Kinseyan Hollywood pedophiles who know exactly what they are doing.
They are on the march – to the Academy Awards and beyond.
Actually I am really surprised by this, Europeans being much looser in the moral standards department. Apparently there are levels to which even they do not stoop to.
This is revolting. I have a nine year-old son and it really hits home for me.
I feel sorry for this boy--his innocence was stolen by his star-struck, greedy parents.
Yeah, John. I agree with Ms. Reisman. I seriously do. Could ya'll, however, post a picture of Nicole in the bathing scene (without the boy) so we could evaluate that?
So you enjoy looking at photos of naked pedophiles? You need to seek professional help.
Please, keep it civil, people.
I meant it tongue-in-cheek, but your point is well taken. For the record, I do not enjoy looking at pedophiles, and I do not need to seek professional help.
The article is not about Planned Parenthood, Girl Scouts, etc. The article focuses on a movie about a ten year old boy and a pedophile. Even a passive defense of Nicole Kidman on this thread is dangerous and stupid. I'm sure you could find plenty of Nicole Kidman supporters on DU.
Glad to hear it.
This thread concens the guild of the actress and I was putting it in perspective. Nicole is an actress. The NEA and Planned Parenthood are our real enemies. Attacking Nicole is jousting at a windmill. Getting the word out about the dangers of the National Education Association and its stated positions is real activism. The NEA is powerfull, perverted, and influences the lives of all public school children. But you would rather attack the little red-haired girl?
Kidman is no 'little red-haired girl'. She's a grown woman who has been married and has adopted several children. As an adult female, she is now promoting a movie where, according to reviewers, she french kisses and bathes with a ten year old boy. Your attempt to minimize her actions in this movie by dragging in whole groups of perverts is unproductive and pointless.
Over the last decade we have had a serial debunking of the work of Kinsey, Freud, Boas, Margaret Meade and Ruth Benedict. We have found a number of "noted" historians charged with plagiarism. Yet, all have been forgiven and remain firmly crushed to the bosom of American academe and its intellectual elitists. Hollywood, which is perhaps the most ahistorical element of them all, is the last to get the word, and will extoll Kinsey, just as they have Castro, Che, Malcolm X, and other excrementum.
"So you enjoy looking at photos of naked pedophiles? You need to seek professional help."
You missed his point, O.C. You know, it IS possible to strongly disagree with the things Nicole does in this movie (and they are wrong; a ten-year old is simply not emotionally or physically capable of handling a scene like this without suffering damage to his psyche) AND still think that (physically) Nicole is an earthshakingly sexy woman.
I recommend the final 15 minutes of Cold Mountain as proof of the latter point.
(Wait a minute...aren't you the leader of the anti-South Park farts here on FR? Nevermind, the very idea of sex probably sends you to the confession box.)
This highly dramatic statement, coupled with a line from your homepage where you describe yourself as someone with "a florid speech" leads me to believe that you are a female. If not, your family has my deepest sympathy.
The ten year old is taller.
"Oh these up tight, repressed Europeans!
What is the fuss it all about?
Kidman insists she doesn't know!"
What is this movie, the Cruise/Kidman Love story. At least they got Cruises persona accurate using the little boy. I am surprised that Kidman didn't get the thinly veiled pedophilia slant on this movie. She was doing so well. Oh well, good thing she already got her Oscar. Another one bites the glitter dust. Like I said before, all the theater seats will be packed with pedo-pervs. Sane people have NO DESIRE to witness such revulsion and it has nothing to do with being "up tight". Kidman is now speaking liberal circle jerk.
From O.C.: "This highly dramatic statement, coupled with a line from your homepage where you describe yourself as someone with "a florid speech" leads me to believe that you are a female. If not, your family has my deepest sympathy."
"That's why I say/ Hey man, nice shot"
You told an actual JOKE, O.C. I'm so proud of you.
If "earthshakingly sexy" is too "florid" (read, wordy) for you, will "that b***h is fine" work?
Now, if you don't find Nicole at all sexy--which probably puts you in a very small minority amongst straight American men--just who (or what type of woman) DO you find sexy?
Please, No gay copouts like "My wife, etc..."; and my question is only relevant assuming the unlikely possibility that you can still get it up.
She should be in prison along with everyone involved in this, including the child's parents.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.