Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy Stripped Kerry Of Security Clearance!!!!!! Unauthorized Contacts With Enemy Agents!
DC Reporter | DC Reporter / MB26

Posted on 10/13/2004 9:48:00 AM PDT by MindBender26

Kerry Lost Security Clearance!

Just spoke with reporter friend in DC. She is talking with former USN ONI types who worked on DOD/USN investigation that resulted in total loss of Kerry’s Navy security clearance.

Kerry had been granted a Top Secret by the Navy on October 11, 1967 based on a routine background investigation by Office of Naval Intelligence. A top secret clearance was required for his work at that time.

Obtaining and holding a security clearance of any level, especially TS or above, requires certain terms, obligations, commitments and conditions from the holder. One of the most important is the holder of the clearance must promptly and fully any contacts with any foreign officials, agents, etc.

Lieutenant Kerry left active duty with the Navy on January 3, 1970, but he still carried those obligations as a commissioned officer of the Naval Reserve. Without telling anyone and without receiving permission from superiors,FBI or counter-intelligence officers, he traveled to Paris in the summer of 1970. He claimed the purpose of his trip was a honeymoon with his first wife, Julia Thorne, but there was another hidden purpose.

Numerous North Vietnamese and Viet Cong intelligence agents and officials were in Paris, having arrived a year earlier for the “Peace Talks.” While in Paris, Kerry met with agents on a number of occasions and had extensive discussions with them about U.S. plans, procedures and how to get the U.S. to essentially surrender in Vietnam.

These clandestine meetings were never reported to the Navy.

Almost a year later, in April 1091, speaking as the leader of the Vietnam Veterans Against The War, Lieutenant Kerry told a Senate hearing about his meetings with enemy agents. Senior DOD officials wanted to prosecute him as a Naval Reserve officer for violating a number of laws and regulations, but this was vetoed by the Nixon White House. They didn’t want to give the anti-war crowd any additional PR ammunition.

However, the Navy immediately pulled Kerry’s security clearance. He became a Naval Reserve officer who was known not to be trusted. He kept his commission, but lost all access to any classified information. In the words of one of the now-retired agents, “Lieutenant Kerry wasn’t cleared to know what time it was!”

The bottom line is, Kerry was on the Intelligence Committee of the Senate after the Paris fiasco and another trip to support the Moscow-backed Sandinistas in Nicaragua.

Today, he couldn’t get a security clearance to pull KP duty, but he wants to be Commander in Chief of all our military in the War on Terrorism!


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aidandcomfort; benedictarnold; gigolo; kerry; kerrybio; liar; liedtocongress; liedtomedia; lurch; napalminthemorning; northvietnamese; securityclearance; traitor; treason; unfitforcommand; usefulidiot; vietnam; vietnamwar; vkpac; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540541-560561-580 ... 641-656 next last
To: ez2muz

Excuse me?


541 posted on 10/13/2004 2:34:03 PM PDT by sauropod (Hitlary: "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

CAN YOU SAY

O C T O B E R S U R P R I S E ! ! !


542 posted on 10/13/2004 2:35:49 PM PDT by dennisw (Gd is against Amelek for all generations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaGman
One question... why would a garden variety lieutenant on a swift boat have a top secret clearance?

One day when I was in the Army I learned that I had a secret clearance. I didn't even know about it. I was fascinated when the Battalion clerk opened up a book which had the war mission of my unit laid out.

I was just an E-4 anxious to get out because I was short, but I did have to do special duty which was really no big deal.

That was long ago and my unit has pretty much been disbanded and we no longer have the other units that were in place back then 25 years ago.

543 posted on 10/13/2004 2:35:53 PM PDT by Radix (What turns orange in Sept., is carved up in Oct., and is thrown out in Nov.?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: angkor
The most damning comment I ever heard from any Vietnamese person was from a former Da Nang air traffic controller - in perfect English from his 2 years training in Texas. "America let us down when we most needed her."

Oh God. That's pretty bad.

544 posted on 10/13/2004 2:54:41 PM PDT by TheSpottedOwl ("In the Kingdom of the Deluded, the Most Outrageous Liar is King".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 530 | View Replies]

To: Nightshift

ping


545 posted on 10/13/2004 3:04:03 PM PDT by tutstar ( <{{--->< http://ripe4change.4-all.org Judge Greer allows violations of Florida Statutes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kkalman
Then how could he serve on the Intelligence Committee?

Because his party put him there.

546 posted on 10/13/2004 3:07:08 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Tennessean4Bush

Look - we know we will never have the press support.

Get over it. We have to use what we have and work around our obstacles.

All I ever hear here are comments about what the press won't do - so we should not bother about that.

If information is important - it has to get out however we can get it out. Not by the media. But, we have to show the media they will not censor our news or our efforts.


547 posted on 10/13/2004 3:09:32 PM PDT by ClancyJ (Vote for President Bush - For our grandchildren. Democrats are not to be trusted with our country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: newsgatherer

...I publish an online paper in Maine, Christian-news-in-maine.com please keep me informed regarding this will you.

...

Great - this is the can-do attitude. We don't have the MSM but do we let them control the U.S. because of it? Kind of makes me mad that a candidate can confiscate the MSM, run an unfair campaign, cheat, lie and steal an election and all the time we sit by complaining that the MSM is biased, they are not fair, ya da ya da ya da.

So, you are doing something about it - thanks.


548 posted on 10/13/2004 3:12:09 PM PDT by ClancyJ (Vote for President Bush - For our grandchildren. Democrats are not to be trusted with our country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

So - what else is news?

Do you have an email list you can expand to include more and more people? Can you accumulate documents they will not see on the MSM and send them to your list periodically?

It may not be perfect but it does prevent the total control of the country by the unelected media and the democrats who chose to run a traitor as a presidential candidate.


549 posted on 10/13/2004 3:14:17 PM PDT by ClancyJ (Vote for President Bush - For our grandchildren. Democrats are not to be trusted with our country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: TNCMAXQ

So, guess you have conceded your rights to the MSM. They are so big, I am one person, they won't print it because it is negative on Kerry.

Is this whole thread going to be comments about what the MSM won't print?

SO WHAT IF THE MSM DOESN'T LIKE IT - DOES THAT MEAN THAT WE ALL BOW DOWN TO THEIR DECISIONS? DO WE HAVE THE INTERNET? DO WE HAVE EMAIL LISTS?

Get proof - ignore what the MSM will or will not do and get busy putting it out there.

Otherwise, we are just whiners like Kerry.


550 posted on 10/13/2004 3:18:31 PM PDT by ClancyJ (Vote for President Bush - For our grandchildren. Democrats are not to be trusted with our country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

Kerry's security clearance is stuffed in Berger's socks headed back into the viewing room for secrets.


551 posted on 10/13/2004 3:22:08 PM PDT by Reaganghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClancyJ

bump


552 posted on 10/13/2004 3:24:06 PM PDT by KSCITYBOY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies]

To: kabar

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1243544/posts

this article might help answer some questions, and since this morning it has been picked up by another source,...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1244132/posts


553 posted on 10/13/2004 3:24:38 PM PDT by tutstar ( <{{--->< http://ripe4change.4-all.org Judge Greer allows violations of Florida Statutes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 507 | View Replies]

To: ez2muz
A TS in one arena does not equal a TS in another.

Actually, when I was in the service, a Secret Crypto clearance was harder to get than most Top Secret clearances. It depends on what you need to know.

554 posted on 10/13/2004 3:25:38 PM PDT by js1138 (Speedy architect of perfect labyrinths.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 518 | View Replies]

To: tutstar
I sent the following email to Tom this morning. I have been corresponding with him for several months.

Tom,

I read the subject article. Although I wholeheartedly agree that Kerry needs to sign an SF 180 authorizing the release of his military records, I don't think there is an issue concerning his Honorable Discharge. Based on my personal experience, Kerry received his Honorable Discharge under the standard process, which obtains for naval officers transitioning through the Reserve process.

On July 1, 1972 Kerry was transferred from the Inactive Reserves (subject to recall, but no drill obligation), to the Standby Reserves. Similarly, I was transferred into the Standby Reserves in November 1972 after resigning my commission and being released from active duty in November of that year. I did not receive my Honorable Discharge until Feb 16, 1978, the same date as Kerry. I received the same letter as Kerry.

The Navy has a board, which meets annually I believe, that decides what officers should be retained in the Standby Reserves or removed and given an Honorable Discharge. The decision is based on skills and Navy personnel requirements. Officers are involuntarily separated as a standard procedure. I think you are reading to much into the Clayton letter, which contains boilerplate language.

The story about Kerry's Reserve status should be about his activities in the antiwar movement, including meeting in Paris with the Vietnamese Communists while still being a member of the Naval Reserves subject to recall. Initially, Kerry's website listed his military service as 1966-1970 --Active Duty and 1972-1978--Navy Reserves. This was revised to the current timeline, John Kerry for President - John Kerry's Service Timeline, which contains some questionable entries and his meant to obscure his status during the period 1970-2.

Kerry's new timeline states that January 3 Kerry requested a discharge. This is incorrect. Kerry was released from active duty on Jan 3, 1972 and transferred into the Inactive Reserves. (See http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/jkerry/releaseactduty.pdf and http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/jkerry/rqsthistserv.pdf)

Kerry's new timeline also lists March 1, 1970 as his "date of separation from active duty." This is clearly incorrect. Finally, they use the date of April 29, 1970 to indicate that Kerry was a "Registrant who has completed service." This designation means that Kerry is no longer subject to the draft. Obviously, the Kerry campaign is deliberately trying to create the impression that Kerry was out of the Service entirely after April 1970. No mention is even made of his Reserve status or Honorable Discharge. This is being done because Kerry realizes he is vulnerable to criticism concerning his participation in the antiwar movement while still a member of the Naval Reserves subject to recall.

I hate to rain on your parade, but the timing of Kerry's honorable discharge tracks with my personal experience. The Internet has been filled with the speculation you mention in your article, i.e., the Carter connection. It just doesn't jibe with the facts and documents we already have.

Re Kerry's medals: As I have previously written to you, Kerry requested his new medals in 1985 as replacements for the ones he threw away in 1971. He admitted he threw them away at the time and then changed his story subsequently that the threw away his ribbons and someone else's medals. He was telling the truth in 1971 and is lying today. What we really need is a copy of his request in 1985 for replacement citations/certificates/medals. Kerry claims they just requested replacement citations and certificates because he knows that replacement medals would undermine his current story, which was most recently mentioned to Charles Gibson on GMA earlier this year.

555 posted on 10/13/2004 3:30:29 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 553 | View Replies]

To: boxerblues

BOOKMARKED>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


556 posted on 10/13/2004 3:34:40 PM PDT by Carolinamom (This space reserved for GWB to sit beside me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: boxerblues

BOOKMARKED>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


557 posted on 10/13/2004 3:35:02 PM PDT by Carolinamom (This space reserved for GWB to sit beside me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

Only a member of the criminal party can sit on the intellegence committee after he has been stripped of his clearance while in the military.....only in our house and senate....look at leaky leahy, the smartest man to walk this earth, biden....he too leaks like a seive. Take a look at those who sit on the judicial committee...the man who let evidence die in a car full of water then swam 7 miles with a 40# back brace to report the dasterdly deed. Only democrats can get away with this sort of stuff.


558 posted on 10/13/2004 3:53:21 PM PDT by tillacum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flamenco Lady
Are you talking about this JAG reference?
If so, the record is still on Kerry's website.

www.johnkerry.com/pdf/jkmilservice/Service_Record.pdf

1 Page - Full Text recreated below:


The following information was compiled from the service record of 
John Forbes Kerry by LCDR D. H. Myers. JAGC, USN, NMPC-06P, Office 
of Legal Counsel, Naval Military Personnel Command.

INDUCTED (PEBD)                         18 February 1966
OCIU-2                                  19 August 1966
D.O.R. as Ensign, USNR
(Active Comm Base Date)                 16 December 1966
D.O.R. as Lt (jg)                       16 June 1968
D.O.R. as LT, USNR                       1 January 1970
Release from ACDU/
  Trf to Naval Reserve                   3 January 1970
Trf to Standby Reserve - Inactive        1 July 1972
Discharged for U. S. Naval Reserve      16 February 1978



ORIG:  D. MYERS, LCDR, JAGC, USNR, NMPC06/OP-01L, 42225, DISK #3
TYPD:  01/25/85, NMPC-06  NBI: KERRY1 ,Courier 10 pitch, 42225. JE


                                                    Enclosure (1)

559 posted on 10/13/2004 3:53:40 PM PDT by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 534 | View Replies]

To: kabar

So, in a nutshell, you don't think the discharge timing is unusual but you dispute the other items.

Do you think that the info re the subject of this thread is inaccurate?


560 posted on 10/13/2004 4:11:40 PM PDT by tutstar ( <{{--->< http://ripe4change.4-all.org Judge Greer allows violations of Florida Statutes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 555 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540541-560561-580 ... 641-656 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson