Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

When are people going to wake up!
1 posted on 10/11/2004 8:26:19 AM PDT by jperspective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: jperspective

How these jokers are getting so much of the Jewish vote is beyond logic.


2 posted on 10/11/2004 8:27:43 AM PDT by mlbford2 ( A pig serves no other purpose in life but to be delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jperspective

3 posted on 10/11/2004 8:28:26 AM PDT by JoJo Gunn (Help control the Leftist population - have them spayed or neutered.©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jperspective

Yet the Jews continue to vote for the 'Rats...
figure that out???


4 posted on 10/11/2004 8:29:19 AM PDT by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1/5 1st Mar Div. Nam 69&70 Semper Fi http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnkerry.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jperspective

Whatever happened to the vaunted Jewish intelligence?

I never thought I'd have the opportunity to say 'Stupid Jews'!

Ever.


5 posted on 10/11/2004 8:29:54 AM PDT by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jperspective

Very good commentary. Thanks.


6 posted on 10/11/2004 8:30:30 AM PDT by Bahbah (Proud member of the pajamahadeen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jperspective
The parallels between Leftists, Islamic terrorists, and Nazis could not be more obvious.

The good and decent people of the world MUST resist this evil.

President Bush MUST be re-elected.

8 posted on 10/11/2004 8:30:51 AM PDT by Savage Beast (9/11 was never repeated--thanks to President Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jperspective
Wow. I'm not surprised that Kerry's camp is loaded with anti-Semites. Their hatred of Israel is transparent.

What throws me is that Kerry's answer to everything seems to be censorship. He didn't like the Swift Boat Vets, so he called on President Bush to shut them up. Of course, this would have violated 527 rules and would have been censorship. Then Kerry didn't like the book "Unfit for Command," so he called on the publisher to stop publishing it. Censorship again. And now he's muzzling visitors to his own web site. Censorship once more.

And Democrats claim we're compromising constitutional rights??

9 posted on 10/11/2004 8:31:28 AM PDT by Prime Choice (It is dangerous to be right when wicked is called 'good.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jperspective

John Kerry's Discharge - He won't sign Form 180 - What is he hiding?

http://acuf.org/issues/issue21/040929pol.asp

What a young man did more than 30 years ago should not be a primary criteria in determining his qualifications to be President of the United States. George Bush has had almost 4 years now as Commander and Chief of the World"s largest military force and he should be judged on how well he has done. Yet John Kerry and the Democratic left won"t give it up. On almost a daily basis he says I served this country honorably as a young man in Vietnam (4 months/12 days) and I will serve this country honorably as Commander and Chief. Then the Left yells that George Bush got preferential treatment in getting into the National Guard and even failed to complete his guard obligations; even forging documents to prove their point.

The facts are that George Bush served honorably in the National Guard obtaining service points far in excess of the 50 annual service points required to meet his obligation. Records show that in 1968/69 he accumulated 253 points, 340 in 1969/70, 137 in 1970/71, 112 in 1971/72, 56 in 1972/73 and 56 in 1973/74. Points far in excess of the service agreed to and that required to meets his obligation and be Honorably Discharged. George Bush has never made his National Guard service a qualification to lead this country, nor has he ever questioned the service of John Kerry.

While the Left and the mainstream media have never questioned the Vietnam era service of John Kerry, they seem to feel that the record of George Bush 30 years ago should be of concern to voters in November. But what about John Kerry's record? We are told that he was a decorated veteran. We are also told that he was deeply involved in anti-war activities on his return from Vietnam in violation of his oath as an officer in the US Navy. By his own account of his actions and protests, he violated the UCMJ, the Geneva Conventions and the U.S. Code while serving as a Navy officer. Further he met, on two occasions, with North Vietnamese negotiators in 1970 and 1971, while a Reserve Officer, willingly placing himself in violation of Article three, Section three of the U.S. Constitution, which defines treason as "giving aid and comfort" to the enemy in time of warfare.

From here the record of John Kerry becomes unclear and the mainstream press won't demand that John Kerry sign a Department of Defense (DOD) form 180 that would release all of his military records. Records released by his campaign are confusing. There are indications that he was Honorably Discharged on Jan. 3, 1970, Feb 16, 1978, July 13, 1978 and even lately Mar. 12, 2001. Why the confusion on a relatively simple service event. Could it be that John Kerry received a less than honorable discharge in the early 70"s because of his anti-war activities? And then was pardoned for those activities when then President Jimmy Carter on January 21, 1978 ( Proclamation 4483) granted a full, complete and unconditional pardon to all persons who may have committed any offense between August 4, 1964 and March 28, 1973 in violation of the Military Selective Service Act or any rule or regulation promulgated there under.

Did John Kerry request that his service be granted an Honorable Discharge and it was finally granted in 1978? Only a complete release of his military records will show what actually happened during this period. And, to date John Kerry has refused to sign the necessary DOD form 180 which would allow for this release. If the Democratic Party, the media, and the Bush critics are going to demand, as they do on almost a daily basis, that George Bush release all of his records, should they not do the same for John Kerry?

Michael Ashbury is a noted researcher and author, and the author of ''Who is the REAL John Kerry?'' (Booksurge.com 2004). His website is at http://www.whoistherealjohnkerry.com


16 posted on 10/11/2004 8:47:46 AM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (GET OUT THE VOTE NOV 2 ! IF YOUR NEIGHBORS OR RELATIVES NEED A RIDE TO THE POLLS OFFER TO HELP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jperspective
When I have listened to some libs talk they seem to distinguish a difference from being antisemitic and anti-zionist. However, they wish to nuance it, the emperor still has no clothes on.
19 posted on 10/11/2004 8:52:12 AM PDT by camboianchristmas (when two or more or gathered in His name...great things happen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
24 posted on 10/11/2004 9:07:17 AM PDT by SJackson (They're not Americans. They're just journalists, Col George Connell, USMC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jperspective

Wait until they find out neocon is a liberal code word for Jewish Republican.


29 posted on 10/11/2004 9:25:16 AM PDT by nonkultur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jperspective
Democrats are inherently bigots. I will argue that with anyone at anytime.

By the way...I do think it OK for anyone to rip into the French all they want. :)

31 posted on 10/11/2004 9:25:52 AM PDT by Artemis Webb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jperspective
Zionists Wolfowitz, Perle, Feith, Bolton etc now make our policy."

Amazing, I've seen criticism of these same people on FR but have always seen them referred to as NEOCONS, which simply identifies their philosophy. I've never seen anyone make any reference to the fact they are Jewish. Yet, the right gets labeled as haters when the real haters are on the left and their labeling of people based on religion or heritage.

34 posted on 10/11/2004 9:29:05 AM PDT by Casloy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jperspective

39 posted on 10/11/2004 10:03:52 AM PDT by Alouette (I'm an "irrational" Jew -- I believe in G-D and His Torah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jperspective
Those posters are not truly ANTI-SEMITIC.

What they are is "BLAME SOMEONE ELSE".

They have decided it would be easy to con people into accepting as fact that "the jews are the reason I am a deadbeat."

They might as well target a larger group and say "All RICH PEOPLE are the reason I am a deadbeat."

That way they have a larger target.

Better yet, why don't they just say "THE MAN is keeping me down!"

Everyone knows THE MAN.

42 posted on 10/11/2004 10:14:56 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (THE MAN will keep you down, until you become a MAN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jperspective
The forum is no linger [sic] allowing hate to be posted to their boards, in direct response to complaints from concerned citizens like you!

How can we have gotten to this many posts without someone noticing that it took complaints to stop this and that prior to that, hate was perfectly OK

The Left in their own words -- Hate is OK until we get too many complaints!!!!

This should be sent to all the MSM so they can try to ignore it.

62 posted on 10/11/2004 12:21:59 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Please quote me. I am an Unimpeachable Source.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jperspective

This isn't a suprise by the informed.
Check out DU and you'll see clearly that the main reason they oppose the Iraq war is because we have our military there to protect Israel.


66 posted on 10/11/2004 1:00:48 PM PDT by mabelkitty (W is the Peoples' President ; Kerry is the Elite Establishment's President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jperspective
God help Israel when rats don't have Bush to blame.
75 posted on 10/12/2004 2:12:23 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jperspective

BTTT


77 posted on 10/12/2004 8:21:29 AM PDT by EdReform (Have you seen FAHRENHYPE 9/11? - www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1240926/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jperspective

Thank you for that great commentary. As a former Democrat I can tell you of so many instances when I've heard so-called tolerant people on the left spout anti-semitic and anti-Israel sentiments. Anti-semitism runs rampant in the Democratic Party, and like many on this board I couldn't tell you why American Jews still support them overwhelmingly. Pat Buchanan is accused of being anti-semitic because of his remarks against Israel, but nothing is said when the Jesse Jacksons and Al Sharptons of the world utter anti-semitic remarks. There's also, I believe, a Democratic congressman Moran from Virginia who voices anti-Israel remarks from time to time. Jews in the United States may not want to admit it, but their strongest allies and supporters lie in the Evangelical Christian community, and not the Democratic Party.


78 posted on 10/12/2004 8:33:35 AM PDT by midftfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson