Skip to comments.
BREAKING FROM HANNITY: CBS Producer in Dallas source of Documents
Hannity.com
| 09/10/2004
| Hannity
Posted on 09/10/2004 12:47:25 PM PDT by WoodstockCat
Hannity just said a story will be filed later today that from sources inside CBS that the source of the documents is also the one who provided the Abu Grihab prison photos.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 60minutes; badoom; cbs; killian; liarsanddamnliars; media; mediabias; mediashillsforkerry; napalminthemorning; rather; rathergate; selectricgate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380, 381-400, 401-420 ... 701-719 next last
To: JLO
Well can they explain how General "Buck" Staudt was interfering with Killian doing his job and trying to "sugarcoat" Bush's evaluation in 1973, when he had retired the year before?
381
posted on
09/10/2004 2:03:54 PM PDT
by
mass55th
(It's the superscript, stupid!!!!)
To: WoodstockCat
I am willing to bet there were print balls available with the th like that, and the th does appear on other Bush ANG records in that manner, so, those thinking that the superscript will be the smoking gun are probably going to be proved wrong. All they need is one document that Bush provided the media that has the superscript, and that piece of the puzzle becomes weak, and even Freepers have provided links to documents that appear to show the superscript was used. It is simply not a provable point, despite it's probability.
But, the fact that the K in the signature doesn't match, that the "writer's" son and widow claim they are fake, the fact that the spacing is identical to MS Word, the fact that experts say the font is only available on computers and many other issues really are more compelling anyway.
This is what happens, however, when people focus too heavily on one small detail before they have it 100% nailed down.
382
posted on
09/10/2004 2:04:28 PM PDT
by
sharktrager
(Nobody deserves our hostility when they are in a time of need.)
To: js1138
383
posted on
09/10/2004 2:04:28 PM PDT
by
Mach9
(.)
To: Palladin
384
posted on
09/10/2004 2:04:38 PM PDT
by
airborne
(2/504 PIR - 'Devils In Baggy Pants')
To: chudogg
385
posted on
09/10/2004 2:04:50 PM PDT
by
No Surrender No Retreat
(These Colors Never Run( 7.62) "See Ya"ll At The VA Clinic" "Xin Loi My Boy")
To: airborne
The Secret Service probably doesn't monitor this website. But there may be a few other websites that they monitor (DU?).
386
posted on
09/10/2004 2:04:55 PM PDT
by
defenderSD
(The number of people who lie about space aliens for $ far exceeds the number of aliens on earth.)
To: MineralMan
I'm not disputing your whole message, no reason to reread it. I am disputing the passage I quoted.
I'm saying that the Executive had a half-space bar for the width of an i and a space bar for the width of an n, making an i one unit wide, an n two units wide, an m three units wide, etc. Stop me here if I'm wrong.
True Type divides them up into much smaller slices, with much finer resolution, plus kerning. You might have been very good with the Executive, but you would not match what a modern word processor and laser printer do, such that one would not be able to tell the difference. No way.
I'd definitely like to see you try.
387
posted on
09/10/2004 2:05:27 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(I'd like to volunteer to build a barn and take you press guys out behind it and kick your asses.)
To: Arrowhead1952; WoodstockCat
388
posted on
09/10/2004 2:05:59 PM PDT
by
MeekOneGOP
(There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
To: woodyinscc
Go Jeff Go!!
Man oh Man, this is fun!
389
posted on
09/10/2004 2:06:02 PM PDT
by
dandelion
(http://johnkerryquestionfairy.blogspot.com/)
To: jbarkley
I'm most interested in the way the number 4 is done on this machine. Do you know what typefaces were available for this machine? Examples of three of the 12 typefaces are represented in the ad I posted just above. I don't know what the other 9 are. But you raise a good point, being that detailed font comparisons are likely to provide additional evidence that teh forged documents were not produced in 1972 and 1973, but sometime after 1997, and most likely, sometime in 2004.
390
posted on
09/10/2004 2:06:17 PM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: reformedliberal
...However, this raises another question: why would anyone have personal memos, written to cover themselves, typed by someone else?....
In my experience it was routine to have the typist type up a memo to file.
391
posted on
09/10/2004 2:06:18 PM PDT
by
bert
(Peace is only halftime !)
To: MineralMan
That's all the proof that's necessary. I have taken a look at several other documents regarding Bush's service. Not all, of course, were produced out of Texas, but I have seen none that remotely match the CBS documents.
392
posted on
09/10/2004 2:07:07 PM PDT
by
Dolphy
(Support swiftvets.com)
To: ambrose
"oh, so you're one up for the "Karl Rove did it" theory?
Hey, remember when Registered did that photo of Jane Fonda and Kerry? It was done as a parody, but was then soon picked up and distributed like it were the genuine article. Maybe they started as a hoax among some dumb ass Rats, and found their way into Rather's hands, who could not resist running with it."
I like the hoax idea, and it's possible. It could even have been a prank that was supposed to be distributed around an office, but got loose. Karl Rove? Nah...that never happened.
There's an explanation here, and it's not the one people are expecting. I hope we hear it.
393
posted on
09/10/2004 2:07:26 PM PDT
by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: MineralMan
All the experts quoted in the various articles and interviews point to the MS Word overlay...
394
posted on
09/10/2004 2:07:29 PM PDT
by
ambrose
(http://www.swiftvets.com/)
To: MineralMan
What are you worried about...further (real) documentation that is more damning? A Republican source? A distraction?
395
posted on
09/10/2004 2:07:33 PM PDT
by
BonnieJ
To: MineralMan
Proportional type was available on the IBM Executive typewriterWas kerning possible, where one letter would share horizontal space with the immediate previous letter?
396
posted on
09/10/2004 2:07:51 PM PDT
by
laredo44
(Liberty is not the problem)
To: chudogg; narby; auggy
Isn't Hackworth often described as "THE most decorated Vietnam vet" ?
Could it be Hackworth has a few phony medals too? Just speculating, of course. But if so, guilty knowledge could be a factor in motivating Hackworth to work behind the scenes -- against Bush, and in favor of a fellow phony.
To: BlessedBeGod
Does anyone know where Hackworth resides?
398
posted on
09/10/2004 2:08:30 PM PDT
by
mass55th
(It's the superscript, stupid!!!!)
To: Extremist
Whoever came up with the idea would have made sure to insulate himself by many times. These copies were probably handed to several individuals so that no one could trace them back.
To: RobRoy
This whole thing reminds me of the analogy some people make in evolution arguments. Believing every one of the anomalies that have been pointed out here came together perfectly in one document typed in the early 70's is the same as believing you can set off an explosion in a junkyard, the result being a perfectly functional 747.
400
posted on
09/10/2004 2:10:05 PM PDT
by
Warren_Piece
(Just thinkin' about women and glasses of beer.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380, 381-400, 401-420 ... 701-719 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson