Skip to comments.
BREAKING FROM HANNITY: CBS Producer in Dallas source of Documents
Hannity.com
| 09/10/2004
| Hannity
Posted on 09/10/2004 12:47:25 PM PDT by WoodstockCat
Hannity just said a story will be filed later today that from sources inside CBS that the source of the documents is also the one who provided the Abu Grihab prison photos.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 60minutes; badoom; cbs; killian; liarsanddamnliars; media; mediabias; mediashillsforkerry; napalminthemorning; rather; rathergate; selectricgate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260, 261-280, 281-300 ... 701-719 next last
To: Crawdad
Great Tag Line...
217 posted on 09/10/2004 4:21:46 PM EDT by Crawdad (I cried because I had no shoes, until I met a man who had no class.)
LOL!!
261
posted on
09/10/2004 1:31:44 PM PDT
by
fanfan
(" The liberal party is not corrupt " Prime Minister Paul Martin)
To: been_lurking
"Even the most experienced typist, with the most expensive proportional typewriter, and all of the wiz-bang replacement keys could not duplicate the kerning used in modern word processing software and laser printers. These documents clearly display this kerning.
Therefore, there is no way these documents could have been typed on the dates identified in the documents."
Exactly. Which is why wasting time on things that can be disproven is just that...a waste of time. All you need is the overlay of the Word document and the memo. While individual aspects could be reproduced, the documents would still be different. Heck, two docs from to different typewriters wouldn't overlay.
The overlay is all that's needed. The rest is arguable. That's not.
262
posted on
09/10/2004 1:31:55 PM PDT
by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: expatpat
where did the documents originatePer my post of 24 hrs ago, I still think Blather knows who created the docs, he knows they were fake, and [to keep from losing everything including quite possibly his Freedom...LOL] he will spill his guts sooner rather than later.
263
posted on
09/10/2004 1:32:03 PM PDT
by
Indie
(Ignorance of the truth is no excuse for stupidity.)
To: gilliam
If he had it typed by a secretary, their initials would be on the page. IIRC it is ss/EE (secretary's initials, lower case/executive's intials upper case) and is added to the lower left-hand corner below the signature block.
However, this raises another question: why would anyone have personal memos, written to cover themselves, typed by someone else?
Killian's widow states that her husband jotted notes on any piece of paper handy and stashed them in his wallet. I know professionals today who have access to word processors and secretaries who do the exact same thing. One is an MD friend and we laugh about his *back pocket file cabinet* all the time.Many people keep a journal in a notebook and use that for personal jottings and to record events. Often this is a small notebook that fits in a shirt pocket.
Only someone under 40 or so would not recall that once-upon-a-time most men did not type. Even if a man did, say a military clerk, once that man reached a certain rank, he probably did not. Executives had too many other duties to spend time typing, especially routine papers. If a military clerk had somehow typed up personal notes for a superior, that clerk would have surely added his initials to the paper in question. It gets to be second nature.
To: WoodstockCat
I am a Texan and this has always smelled like Texas lib Dems to me...Austin is the center of left wing dems in Texas....They slimed Bush when he ran for Governor..nothing new.
I have no idea when these docs were created but the stories have floated around for years...Rather,CBS, fell in love with the story, believed it, because they want Bush defeated....Rather has Texas sources, friends in the dem party here....
265
posted on
09/10/2004 1:32:42 PM PDT
by
MEG33
(John Kerry has been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security)
To: sinkspur
Is it absolutely impossible that a retired commander might apply pressure to Killian on behalf of a third party?
266
posted on
09/10/2004 1:32:58 PM PDT
by
Chunga
To: WoodstockCat
To: Boundless
Send the 52 reasons they're fake to NBC, ABC, CNN and Fox. I'm sure they'd all enjoy taking down CBS News.
To: Riley
269
posted on
09/10/2004 1:33:38 PM PDT
by
FredZarguna
(I'm FredZarguna, Founder and President of Fathers United to Counter Kerry.)
To: Riley
What was the name of the target of the 'two-minute hate' in Orwell's '1984'?
Emmanuel Goldstein.
270
posted on
09/10/2004 1:34:01 PM PDT
by
Mike Fieschko
(Oh, and Dick Cheney too.)
To: brothers4thID
I swear on the Free Republican charter, if you ever post that photo again I will gouge my own eyes out. I have several. Want to see them all?
271
posted on
09/10/2004 1:34:37 PM PDT
by
SheLion
(Donate to Swift Boat Vets. "I" did!)
To: WoodstockCat
They need to turn the docs over for carbon dating and to be checked for 'rag' content of the paper fiber. The 'rag' content in 1970's paper would be different than today's paper. Also to see if they match other paper out of the office of Col. Killian. Older docs are no longer white-white but off color or yellowed if not stored properly.
272
posted on
09/10/2004 1:34:49 PM PDT
by
GailA
( hanoi john, I'm for the death penalty for terrorist, before I impose a moratorium on it.)
To: Howlin
I was bringing that up yesterday. It is higher on the printed page than in word on the computer screen.
273
posted on
09/10/2004 1:35:14 PM PDT
by
RobRoy
(You only "know" what you experience. Everything else is mere belief.)
To: MEG33
If these documents had existed during the 2000 election cycle, they would have been used in 2000.
To: Mike Fieschko
"Or, you could call 1-800-HAMSTER."
Ok..I called it and kerry answered....I am doomed!!! LOL
To: AaronInCarolina
Its even highly unlikely that you could get MS Word to produce a word "finger-print" match with another modern word-processor (such as Word Perfect) even if both used the same proportional font. There are so many details in the font, as well. Open vs. closed "4" for example.
These documents are not authentic, I am convinced. CBS is going to obfuscate the issue.
276
posted on
09/10/2004 1:35:28 PM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: tang-soo
Glad I could help out. I showed that to a lot of libs today. They had no come back at all. They are finished I hope. Post 13 is very interesting as well.
To: WoodstockCat; MeekOneGOP; PhilDragoo; Geist Krieger; devolve; Mia T; potlatch; JohnHuang2; ...
Like reading directly off the front page of the
NATIONAL INQUIRER (right next to the story about the woman having puppies) . . .
_____________________
"Hannity just said a story will be filed later today that from sources inside CBS that the source of the documents is also the one who provided the Abu Grihab prison photos."
278
posted on
09/10/2004 1:35:50 PM PDT
by
Happy2BMe
(Jihad - coming to a school near you - 54 days until November 2nd - 9/11 is this Saturday.)
To: MEG33
I agree Meg33. Also, tell the family hello from Lbk! ;)
279
posted on
09/10/2004 1:36:24 PM PDT
by
JFC
To: Chunga
No it is far from impossible. Retirees can still hold a little clout. Is it likely? That's a toss up.
280
posted on
09/10/2004 1:37:02 PM PDT
by
MagnumRancid
(I need a new screen name - its left over from my Doom/Quake playing days.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260, 261-280, 281-300 ... 701-719 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson