Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: been_lurking

"Even the most experienced typist, with the most expensive proportional typewriter, and all of the wiz-bang replacement keys could not duplicate the kerning used in modern word processing software and laser printers. These documents clearly display this kerning.

Therefore, there is no way these documents could have been typed on the dates identified in the documents."

Exactly. Which is why wasting time on things that can be disproven is just that...a waste of time. All you need is the overlay of the Word document and the memo. While individual aspects could be reproduced, the documents would still be different. Heck, two docs from to different typewriters wouldn't overlay.

The overlay is all that's needed. The rest is arguable. That's not.


262 posted on 09/10/2004 1:31:55 PM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies ]


To: MineralMan
Exactly. Which is why wasting time on things that can be disproven is just that...a waste of time. All you need is the overlay of the Word document and the memo. While individual aspects could be reproduced, the documents would still be different. Heck, two docs from to different typewriters wouldn't overlay.

Maybe we need a thread on debunking all the forgery theories here. The ones that stand up to intense scrutiny should fall out and be the ones that we use. Frankly some of the threads have gotten ridiculous.

282 posted on 09/10/2004 1:37:31 PM PDT by Paradox (Occam was probably right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson