Posted on 09/09/2004 3:10:33 PM PDT by Semper Paratus
Brit Hume announced story coming up now on National Guard docmunents
Eat this, Tom Harkin!
LOOK > > > > >
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1211419/posts
That's what fox said. Of course, that could change by sundown PST.
Finally, at long last, MSM will get what's coming to them. This will be HUGH. They just finished talking about the docs on Roll Call, Fred Barnes (?) talked about how they were done on a word processor with Microsoft Word. Face it, Danny Boy, you're TOAST.
And guranteed to build up tomorrow and into the weekend for all the Talking Heads to comment on over the weekend..............HA ha ha
Bwahahahaha!
M E L T D O W N!
A thing of beauty!
You know the forgery could have been done a few years ago and wasn't used. Boy, I am intrigued. How dumb is CBS.
Pretty darn dumb, Cajungirl. This had to have been ginned up by someone fairly young, someone who didn't know the history of typewriter fonts, etc, and didn't know anything about the military.
Even at that, this is an EXTREMELY clumsy forgery. Don't you think that if you were forging a document for an organization like CBS to use, you would at least compare it to documents of that era, to try to make it match?
It's too late. Stephen is stumping for kerry/edwards here in maine.
Interesting, but if we could come across a vendor record that shows that the typewriters they had in the office could absolutely not create the docs, the Left would be discredited for a long, long time.
Gary Killian was in the ANG with his father, and retired as a Captain. Says his father wasn't in the habit of taking work home with him, that no officer would have written a document that wasn't signed. It was a dangerous thing to do to create a document like the one claiming "sugar coating" on Bush's rating, and he know his father would never do anything like that. Something like that could blow back up in your face later on.
Gary Killian(son of document "author")..mix of truth and fiction...Can't imagine his father doing this...Played Harkin's diatribe(yawn)
Barnes is saying CBS should explain. The document about physical does not contain superscript...Kondrake says it is a crock...unless there is some reason he could not pass(drugs,etc,)the physical and if so come clean so they can't pull a last minute DUI like 2000...Someone said if there are any forgeries...that IS a big story.
WAY TO GO FREEPERS!!!!!!!
Hugh Hewitt has reached the conclusion that the memos are definitely forgeries. I think he needs to slow down here so he doesn't end up with egg on his face. Experts are saying it's a 90% probability that these are forgeries, but it's not a certainty yet. Chill out for a while Hugh and let this play out. It's Memogate....this will take a few more days to crystalize.
I am wondering if they did have in fact an expert who verified them and now recants it and they are hiding him now so as not to shame themselves, that would make absolute sense.
Aaaah, they are shameless.
I saw it. Brit said that one document that was typed out using Word software when overlayed to the CBS document, is was a perfect fit, indicating a forged/fraudulent document. See BS is SLIMY!!There was another thread I saw a short while ago that illustrated that same effect. I'll get it and link it to you here in a few minutes!
Rather must have popped a few Viagras.
Spinning the news for over 30 years
If he said that, he's either got top shelf advise, or he's a fool.
ON DRUDGE NOW!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.