Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why I'm Voting for John Kerry
The Wall Street Journal ^ | July 20, 2004 | FELIX ROHATYN

Posted on 07/20/2004 5:50:12 AM PDT by presidio9

Edited on 07/20/2004 7:22:21 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

As a first-generation American I care passionately for this country and I fear for its future. And as an active Democrat, I support the Kerry-Edwards ticket for two fundamental reasons: First, I believe that their view of America and of our domestic economic and social priorities will improve the prospects of a better future for all Americans; and second, I believe that their view of America's position in the world and its relationship to our allies will make us safer in today's dangerous global environment.

The Bush administration came into office with a wealth of experience and a radical view of our domestic as well as of our foreign policy. Their domestic economic policies consisted of large transfers of wealth to upper-income Americans through tax cuts, of large deficits, a cheap dollar and high levels of debt. Significant increases in defense, a recession and the war in Iraq added hundreds of billions of dollars to the deficit. Internationally, the administration took an equally radical approach, jeopardizing 50 years of American leadership on a whole range of international institutions and agreements.

The initial reaction of the Bush administration to the events of 9/11 was thoroughly effective and professional. It assembled a broad international coalition, under a U.N. resolution, and won a quick military victory in Afghanistan. And then it was diverted to Iraq, ignoring the objections of key allies and the U.N. and ending up in the morass we see today.

Four years into its term, both the domestic and foreign policies of the Bush administration have, in many respects, failed. Our budget, currency, debt and trade balance, have all deteriorated dramatically; our deficits and sagging dollar have raised the potential of an eventual financial crisis. What is more, I believe that Americans are less safe -- despite the capture of Saddam Hussein -- and less well off, despite the rise in the stock market.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: yawn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last
To: presidio9

More proof of what happens when you lower the bar on citizenship requirments.....
first gen Amerian my tucus...this guy aint no American


21 posted on 07/20/2004 6:06:19 AM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Numbers Guy

I'm trying to figure out why this article was worth printing in the first place. Is the WSJ just trying to be "fair and balanced"?


22 posted on 07/20/2004 6:06:25 AM PDT by Russ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Was this a letter to the editor or was he hired by Al Hunt and works as a rat for the WSJ?


23 posted on 07/20/2004 6:06:52 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Teresa Heinz Kerry: 'I have to say that John Edwards is very beautiful'...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

I was just home for a 35th HS reunion. I could tell who was Democrat and who was Republican without asking. After the reunion, I have been emailing with people who were at the reunion, and by email I ask them if they vote "D" or "R". I am guessing correctly every time. I base it on their personality, how stable they are. The ones who are calmer, more stable, happier, without exception vote "R". The ones who are emotional at the drop of a hat, and unhappy, and who can't discuss an issue with you without getting all emotional and worked up, without exception are "D".


24 posted on 07/20/2004 6:07:51 AM PDT by buffyt (Bush Cheney Victory 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

"Their domestic economic policies consisted of large transfers of wealth to upper-income Americans through tax cuts"

What a crock! Only a democrat could think that allowing people to keep more of the money they earn is a transfer of wealth. In the democrat world view, all money belongs to the government and if the government allows to keep any of the money you have earned, then they are doing you a favor.


25 posted on 07/20/2004 6:08:05 AM PDT by Max Combined
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladtx

GIRLYMAN


26 posted on 07/20/2004 6:08:12 AM PDT by mict42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
What is more, I believe that Americans are less safe -- despite the capture of Saddam Hussein -- and less well off, despite the rise in the stock market.

Man, I love Democrats. "We're less safe, despite all indicators to the contrary, and we're less well off, despite the fact that we have more jobs, more homes, and more money."

27 posted on 07/20/2004 6:09:16 AM PDT by ICX (To think that all problems could be solved if people behaved responsibly is irresponsible!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Felix speaks of a large transfer of wealth to the rich through tax cuts under Pres. Bush.To transfer usually means taking from one and giving to another. How is anything being given here? Those, unlike me, who are rich are being allowed to keep the monies they earned. No one is taking money from my pay check and giving it to them.

Transferring wealth is taking tax dollars from me and giving it to others say in the form of Pell Grants for college, medicaid for health care, or earned income tax credits and food stamps.

It is reasonabe to argue the merits of the Bush tax cuts, and it is even understandable when politicians like Kerry demagogue the topic, but when a person of Rohatyn's stature who is arguing the case in a supposedly calm deliberate manner uses innacurate and inflammatory terms like transferring wealth to the rich then the ability to discuss issues rationally appears to have gone by the boards.

28 posted on 07/20/2004 6:10:45 AM PDT by xkaydet65 (" You have never tasted freedom my friend, else you would know, it is purchased not with gold, but w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Their domestic economic policies consisted of large transfers of wealth to upper-income Americans through tax cuts...

Only a brain-dead lefty could believe that taking less money away from people who earned it, regardless of income level, is a "transfer of wealth".

29 posted on 07/20/2004 6:10:45 AM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

"Significant increases in defense, a recession and the war in Iraq added hundreds of billions of dollars to the deficit."

Defense has to be increased because of the gutting of defense during the Clinton administration and because of the needs of the war on terror. The recession began at the end of the Clinton administration and was made worse by the 911 attacks. Thank heaven for the tax cuts or the recession would have been deeper and longer.


30 posted on 07/20/2004 6:11:14 AM PDT by Max Combined
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ICX

What idiots!


31 posted on 07/20/2004 6:11:30 AM PDT by DooDahhhh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

Comment #32 Removed by Moderator

To: presidio9

"Why I am voting for Chamberlain over Churchill". What a loser.


33 posted on 07/20/2004 6:12:15 AM PDT by rageaholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

kerry, testimony before Congress, 22 April, 1971, kerry says, "I have been to Paris. I have talked with both delegations at the peace talks, that is to say the Democratic Republic of Vietnam and the Provisional Revolutionary Government,...."*(not on any authorised mission by the U.S. Government or by the U.S. military, kerry and his VVAW group meets and negotiates with the then enemy).

*excerpted from the Official U.S. Congressional Record dated 22 April, 1971.


"revamp the U.S. military", read as kerry's plan to PURGE the U.S. Military of Pro U.S. Military Veterans and Republicans, make it totally dependant on U.N. forces support for any significant achievement capable military(similar to france,germany, etc.), Turn home based U.S. Armed Forces, Intelligence agencies and Law Enforcement agencies into the democratic party's{including CPUSA and DSA} Praetorian Guard!!!!


kerry stabbed U.S. in the back continually since his return from Viet Nam. How much more backstabbing from this 22 April, 1971 testimony(self confessed traitor) before Congress that he(kerry) met with the then enemy in Paris, are we supposed to stand????

Some More Interesting historical news about kerry:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1091943/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1160580/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1165078/posts

Some of kerry's friends listed below:

http://www.cpusa.org/

http://www.dsausa.org/

DSA's "Progressive Caucus" Links below:

http://bernie.house.gov/pc/

http://bernie.house.gov/pc/members.asp

They are the Enemy Within!!!!

I have at least one or two interesting posts about said such subject matter, below:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1165983/posts

And see:

http://tonkin.spymac.net/hanoikerry1.html

More: Communist Party Backs the RATS!!!! below:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1171176/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1172055/posts


34 posted on 07/20/2004 6:13:08 AM PDT by Defender2 (Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

35 posted on 07/20/2004 6:14:04 AM PDT by ThomasMore (Pax et bonum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Max Combined

Oops. Substitute "democrat" for "brain-dead lefty" and we both make the same point.


36 posted on 07/20/2004 6:14:53 AM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: driftless
It would have been in their best interests he asserts.

He actually says that it is in their best interests to aid us now in Iraq with security and reconstruction. The Saddam and Oil-for-bribes gravy train is over and nothing can change that. A unstable Iraq is in no one's best interest.

That says nothing about their interests in early 2003.

37 posted on 07/20/2004 6:14:53 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (This is Ohio. If you don't have a brewski in your hand you might as well be wearing a dress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

A rather "happy" looking fellow.

Rohatyn served as United States Ambassador to France from 1997 to 2000. Prior to that, he was managing director of the investment banking firm, Lazard Frères & Company in New York, where he earned his reputation as a leading world authority on mergers and acquisitions. He is a regular contributor to The Wall Street Journal and his columns and editorials also appear in The New York Times, The Washington Post, The International Herald Tribune, Financial Times, Le Monde and The New York Review of Books. Rohatyn is also frequently a guest commentator on network news programs. His book, Money Games: My Journey Through American Capitalism, 1950-2000, will be published by Simon and Schuster in April 2003.

Rohatyn is a trustee of the Center for Strategic and International Studies and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. He currently serves on the boards of directors of Comcast Corporation, Fiat, S.p.A., Suez, LVMH (Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton) and Publicis Groupe, S.A. Rohatyn also is chairman of Aton Pharma, Inc., a pharmaceutical company involved in the research and development of drugs for the treatment of cancer. He is a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and of numerous other nonprofit organizations. He is a commander in the French Legion of Honor.
Rohatyn currently serves as president of Rohatyn Associates, LLC, which provides financial advice to corporations. He resides in New York City.

38 posted on 07/20/2004 6:17:02 AM PDT by raybbr (My 1.4 cents - It used to be 2 cents, but after taxes - you get the idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Can't we all just get along with the terrorists...Europe does.../sarcasm

39 posted on 07/20/2004 6:17:49 AM PDT by Wolverine (A Concerned Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Their domestic economic policies consisted of large transfers of wealth to upper-income Americans through tax cuts, of large deficits, a cheap dollar and high levels of debt.

The typical leftist delusion: Tax-cuts (keeping more of MY money) is a "transfer" of wealth. Crazy talk.

40 posted on 07/20/2004 6:18:13 AM PDT by diotima (Telegram Sam, you're my main man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson