Skip to comments.
Vanity: [FR Poll] If it's Kerry vs Bush how will you vote?
2/7/2003
| FR
Posted on 02/07/2004 4:46:02 PM PST by yonif
I thought because there is a poll on FR that says "If it's Kerry vs Bush how will you vote?" it would be good to start a thread on the matter for people to explain how they voted in the poll, if they choose to do so.
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2004; bush; elections; gwb2004; kerry; traitorsinourmidst
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 761-775 next last
To: Godebert
Liberty is #1 for sure, but it's hard to exercise one's liberty when you're at room temperature because the Commander-in-Chief has forgotten his primary duty.... Protecting the American People from our enemies
241
posted on
02/07/2004 6:28:00 PM PST
by
MJY1288
(IF JOHN KERRY IS THE ANSWER, IT MUST BE A STUPID QUESTION)
To: 4integrity; All
I had a dear friend who gave his life for our country in Vietnam. He had never been out of the state of Ohio when he got drafted
So sorry, but everytime I look at that pathetic, money grubbing, Kennedy wannabe, elitist snob Kerry...and knowing how he uses his service in Vietnam to solicit votes....I see the face of James William Lunsford.
Do you STILL want to know who I'm going to vote for?
242
posted on
02/07/2004 6:28:16 PM PST
by
LisaMalia
(Buckeye Fan since birth!!)
To: Godebert
The Constitution Party can't even break 100,000 nationwide.... check your facts.....
How about the following:
Howard Phillips .. Constitution Party .. 98,016 votes
243
posted on
02/07/2004 6:28:21 PM PST
by
deport
(269 days until Tuesday 2 November - General Election)
To: Senator Pardek
Get a room!!!! :-)
244
posted on
02/07/2004 6:28:40 PM PST
by
MJY1288
(IF JOHN KERRY IS THE ANSWER, IT MUST BE A STUPID QUESTION)
To: Neets
Dang, and I was so eloquent too.
To: Indy Pendance
I'm not against 3rd parties either IP...
I just think a realistic look at things shows a 3rd Party candidate cannot win in a Presidential election.
I believe that working at getting the congressional conservative strengths beefed up is the best course of action for 3rd party activism.
246
posted on
02/07/2004 6:30:23 PM PST
by
Neets
(I always feel like somebody's watching me.~)
To: nopardons; Godebert
ok, ok you two, we can have our liberty and we can have our safety. BUT, WE NEED TO KEEP KERRY OUT OF THE BIG WHITE HOUSE ON PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE!!!!
To: nopardons
"Dead, " liberty " will mean nothing to you. :-)Good thing our founding fathers didn't have that attitude.
To: wimpycat
Sounds like he was never potty trained.
To: Dec31,1999
You
VOTED FOR CLINTON IN '96 ?
You VOTED FOR CLINTON because Dole made Viagra adds ?
You VOTED FOR CLINTON And call your self a Conservative and imagine yourself to be politically savvy ?
After four years of Clinton as president and you STILL VOTED FOR CLINTON IN '96 and expect any of us to accept ANYTHING you have to say about politics ?
To: Godebert
OK OK, how many Liberties have you lost under George W. Bush, Scratch that... How many have you lost in your entire lifetime? No Black Helicopter stuff, just real honest to goodness Liberties you have lost?
251
posted on
02/07/2004 6:33:20 PM PST
by
MJY1288
(IF JOHN KERRY IS THE ANSWER, IT MUST BE A STUPID QUESTION)
To: yonif
If I was an "oppressed minority", a homosexual, an athiest, a single mother on welfare, or some other kind of creep, goofball or parasite I would vote for Kerry. But I am not any of those, so why would I vote with the Democrat base? Gotta vote Bush.
To: Senator Pardek
Why? I'm really a very nice, kind, intelligent person; not to mention likable. :-)
To: deport
I stand corrected. Never-the-less, I'm proud to be counted among the 98,000 Americans who still believe the Constitution means exactly what it says.
To: nopardons
Ease up there, read his post again
255
posted on
02/07/2004 6:35:18 PM PST
by
MJY1288
(IF JOHN KERRY IS THE ANSWER, IT MUST BE A STUPID QUESTION)
To: Neets
If the third party was smart, they'd use the GOP like the commies and socialists used the dems. The infrastructure is in place, everything they need for a gradual change can be found without establishing credibility, just start changing within. It's much more feasible than trying to convince 50 million to vote for a new party.
To: Hand em their arse
That's exactly my pont! :-)
To: Godebert
Channeling again, or are you using an ouija board now ?
To: Jim Robinson
My point is that it's hard to get a real Conservative on the bench no matter who appoints them. I think much more attention should be paid to this issue.
Attention is the flow that gets things done.
I don't understand why we don't call the Dem's bluff on their filibusters. To filbuster is their right, but we also have the right to wait it out, as I understand. Furthermore, I fail to understand why Republicans don't/ havent filibustered in return--even against Lib appointees by Republican Politicians/Presidents.
It must work both ways.
Turn about is fair play.
259
posted on
02/07/2004 6:37:41 PM PST
by
Dec31,1999
(Attention is the flow of Consciousness. IOW, PR is everything)
To: MJY1288
Okay, I read it again...it still sounds dreadful. :-(
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 761-775 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson