Skip to comments.
Science Trumps Ritual in Mystery Skeleton Row [Kennewick Man]
Reuters--UK ^
| Thu 5 February, 2004
| Adam Tanner
Posted on 02/05/2004 5:52:19 AM PST by syriacus
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Denying a request by American Indian tribes who sought an immediate burial, a U.S. appeals court ruled on Wednesday that scientists should be allowed to continue testing on a 9,000-year-old skeleton.
"It's terrific," said Robson Bonnichsen director of Texas A&M University's Center for the Study of the First Americans and a plaintiff in the case. "The court has upheld the principle for scientific study of very early human remains."
The legal battle pitting Bonnichsen and seven other scientists against the U.S. government and Indian tribes dates back to 1996, after two teenagers discovered a skeleton near the shore of the Columbia River near Kennewick, Washington.
Scientists dated the "Kennewick Man" remains as 8,340 to 9,200 years old, yet it was a puzzling find because its features differed from those of American Indians. Scientists hoped further study would shed light on early North Americans.
(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.co.uk ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: dillehay; godsgravesglyphs; history; kennewick; kennewickman; preclovis; skeleton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
To: syriacus
The image on the left is a forensic clay form made from the skull of Kennewick Man. He kind of looks like Patrick Stewart (right).
21
posted on
02/05/2004 1:17:47 PM PST
by
ElkGroveDan
(Fighting for Freedom and Having Fun)
To: gcruse
What is the 'greater good' of burying clues to the common history of mankind? History of Mankind? There's plenty around us and most is ignored. I can raise similiar questions for cloning, fetal tissue experimentation.. all in the name of science, knowledge, evolution of mankind. Does it make it right?
I firmly believe that classic theories on human migration are incorrect, so what? I would not "tool with" a corpse in the name of science.
To: NativeSon
History of Mankind? There's plenty around us and most is ignored.
What do you mean?
I can raise similiar questions for cloning, fetal tissue experimentation.. all in the name of science, knowledge, evolution of mankind. Does it make it right?
I notice a propensity for moral judgements here. But I'll play. I have no problem with cloning, stem cell research or evolution.
I firmly believe that classic theories on human migration are incorrect, so what?
So why bury the chance to prove or disprove your beliefs?
I would not "tool with" a corpse in the name of science.
Then you shouldn't.
23
posted on
02/05/2004 1:47:09 PM PST
by
gcruse
(http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
To: ElkGroveDan
Everyone keeps saying he doesn't look "Indian". There are many different kinds of Indians in the U.S. I've seen pictures of Indians that look a lot like this bust. I don't think he looks any more white than he does Indian. I don't know of any test they can do on 9000 year bones that is going to be fullproof evidence. Which tells me just bury the guy and go on with life.
To: fish hawk
Its not just subjective observation that causes them to rule him out as American Indian. There are certain body proportions that are constant within racial groups -- skull shapes, etc. My understanding is that everything about him and his bone structure suggest that his physical characteristics are distinctly outside the normal range of proportions on the many, many tens of thousands of Indian remains they have studied and catalogued from across the Americas.
25
posted on
02/05/2004 2:47:23 PM PST
by
ElkGroveDan
(Fighting for Freedom and Having Fun)
To: ElkGroveDan
Amazing similarity.
26
posted on
02/06/2004 5:16:37 AM PST
by
syriacus
(Why are re-enactments like Plimouth Plantation OK, but Gibson's Passion is not OK?)
To: evets
Thanks for the information. I hadn't ever heard of Asatru so I did a quick google.
Pagans battle corps over old bones
This story was published Saturday, August 23rd, 1997 By Mike Lee Herald staff writer
As Norse pagans prepare to celebrate the 9,200-year-old bones found last summer in Kennewick, they also are stepping up their legal fight.
The Asatru Folk Assembly filed a motion Friday in U.S. District Court in Portland asking Magistrate Judge John Jelderks to remove the so-called Kennewick Man remains from the Army Corps of Engineers' jurisdiction.[snip]
Once they found out the corps allowed American Indian tribes to hold secret ceremonies with the bones, the Asatru said the corps could not be trusted as an arbiter in the case. [excerpt]
27
posted on
02/06/2004 5:26:45 AM PST
by
syriacus
(Why are re-enactments like Plimouth Plantation OK, but Gibson's Passion is not OK?)
To: steplock
It is far more probable that Kennewick man was Ainu than Caucasian. The Ainu are a non-Japanese population indeginous to Hokkaido and the northern Islands of Japan. It is believed that the Ainu population was isolated before the monern races were established.
Another possibility is that he was related to the Aborignies of Australia and the South Pacific in that evidence of their presence has been found in Brazil predating the modern Indian populations.
To: Natural Law
"Brazil predating the modern Indian populations."
I remember reading about that group - and there is supposedly even survivors TODAY of those original humans in the western hemisphere. They're living up in the hills of (Argentina / Chile ?).
I believe they were Polynesian /Indian descent?
29
posted on
02/06/2004 6:29:24 AM PST
by
steplock
(www.FOCUS.GOHOTSPRINGS.com)
To: gcruse
What do you mean? Many things are known about people in general and groups of people and their accomplishments or lack thereof. There is also much known about human behavior. But any of this that is deemed un-PC or hurtful is ignored. Digging up (pun intended) more dirt (yet again) is of what use? Socially digestible information will be published for consumption the rest stricken.
I notice a propensity for moral judgments here. But I'll play. I have no problem with cloning, stem cell research or evolution.
Moral judgments yes. I know that some things have a price that is far too high no matter the benefit. The ends should not always justify the means.
So why bury the chance to prove or disprove your beliefs?
Because this will prove nothing. Except that scientist have the Right to trespass and dig up my ancestors in the name of science. Even if the remains of this man prove to be Caucasoid he is still our ancestor.
Disturbing the dead is not good, what was a man has long since settled.
To: syriacus
Sanity, finally, in this ridiculous case.
31
posted on
02/06/2004 6:33:16 AM PST
by
Quix
(Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
To: steplock
The first Americans were descended from Australian aborigines, according to new evidence presented in a BBC documentary. The program, called Ancient Voices, shows that the dimensions of prehistoric skulls found in Brazil match those of the aboriginal peoples of Australia and Melanesia. Researchers have found evidence that they were later massacred and canabalized by invaders from Asia. Maybe we should conduct a title search before we cede anymore indigenous property rights to the noble savages.
To: NativeSon
Even if the remains of this man prove to be Caucasoid he is still our ancestor.
Caucasian is more my immediate ancestor than a native American's. Therefore, being refused his remains by those less related to him than me is wrong.
33
posted on
02/06/2004 10:09:55 AM PST
by
gcruse
(http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
To: gcruse
Caucasian is more my immediate ancestor than a native American's. Therefore, being refused his remains by those less related to him than me is wrong. That's a silly argument- what was intended by my statement is that this that was a man was here and so were Indians at the that time, and what he was became part of them.
Sort of like you're an America no matter where your family originated. Ireland, Germany, Italy, etc., would have no claim on what was you or yours.
For the record, I'm a curious man by nature and by profession - I was a scientist (Pharm/Tox) before my current career - I like to know things, I like truth.
But I value religion and morales
To: NativeSon; SunkenCiv
He's dead, Jim.
There is no violation of the sanctity of human life by examining his bones now. There is much yet to be learned about him and his people. American pre-history is primarily assumption based on very little data, and that is leading to ridiculous claims in courts. If the past is important to modern legal decisions, then let's document the past with some accuracy.
To: ValerieUSA
:') It's taken more than fifty years to bury Clovis-First-and-Only, but thanks to Dillehay et al, we're all just waiting for the flatline. (':
36
posted on
02/07/2004 8:19:36 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(Migration, Yourgration, Ourgration, Theirgration)
The man died 9000 years ago. No one can "claim" him except the earth. -- Sacajaweau
That's what the researchers said, and now the court has agreed.
37
posted on
02/07/2004 8:21:38 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(Migration, Yourgration, Ourgration, Theirgration)
To: NativeSon
One more added to the list of "done for the greater good" . But who's greater good? If you can't tell the difference between "whose" and "who's", I'm afraid no explanation is possible...
38
posted on
02/07/2004 8:28:02 PM PST
by
Publius6961
(40% of Californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)
To: Sacajaweau
The man died 9000 years ago. No one can "claim" him except the earth. I am sure that your sentiments were different when the indians were claiming the body with the flimsiest and most absurd reason: ignorance.
39
posted on
02/07/2004 8:32:46 PM PST
by
Publius6961
(40% of Californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)
To: syriacus
40
posted on
02/07/2004 8:35:16 PM PST
by
blam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson