Many things are known about people in general and groups of people and their accomplishments or lack thereof. There is also much known about human behavior. But any of this that is deemed “un-PC” or “hurtful” is ignored. Digging up (pun intended) more dirt (yet again) is of what use? Socially digestible information will be published for consumption the rest stricken.
I notice a propensity for moral judgments here. But I'll play. I have no problem with cloning, stem cell research or evolution.
Moral judgments yes. I know that some things have a price that is far too high no matter the benefit. The ends should not always justify the means.
So why bury the chance to prove or disprove your beliefs?
Because this will prove nothing. Except that scientist have the Right to trespass and dig up my ancestors in the name of science. Even if the remains of this man prove to be Caucasoid he is still our ancestor.
Disturbing the dead is not good, what was a man has long since settled.