Skip to comments.
Saddam 'Actively Involved' In Directing Attacks On US Troops (New)
The Telegraph (UK) ^
| 12-21-2003
| Philip Sherwell
Posted on 12/20/2003 4:17:40 PM PST by blam
Saddam 'actively involved' in directing attacks on the US forces
By Philip Sherwell in Baghdad
(Filed: 21/12/2003)
Saddam Hussein was personally directing the post-war insurgency inside Iraq, playing a far more active role than previously thought, American intelligence officers have concluded since his capture.
Despite the bewildered appearance of the deposed dictator when he was hauled from his hiding-hole last weekend, he is believed to have been issuing regular instructions on targets and tactics through five trusted lieutenants.
US soldiers arresting former Iraqi officers and Ba'ath party members in Tikrit last month
This conclusion could have serious implications for his status in United States custody. American officials have made clear that he will lose his rights as a prisoner of war if he was involved in the post-war violence.
Documents found in his briefcase when he was caught indicated that he had been kept informed of the progress of the insurgency but they did not suggest he had overall control of operations by former Ba'ath Party loyalists.
However, since the arrest and interrogation of guerrilla leaders named in the paperwork, US investigators believe that Saddam was at the head of an elaborate network of rebel cells.
They have put together a detailed picture of Saddam's support structure while in hiding. This enabled him to issue commands without the use of satellite phones that could be picked up by monitoring devices.
The Telegraph has also learned that millions of dollars to support the insurgency were recovered in raids on other suspected Saddam safe houses. US officials say he was in regular contact with five "enablers" - veterans of his feared security services drawn from his power base of Tikrit.
Each man had his own responsibility: logistics, financing, planning, operations and as chief of staff. It was the last of these, picked up in a swoop in Baghdad nine days ago, who gave away Saddam's hiding place.
"They knew where he was and they were able to travel to him or meet him somewhere," said Major Stan Murphy, the intelligence officer for the 4th Infantry Division's 1st Brigade, which captured the deposed dictator.
The enablers kept Saddam informed and passed his commands to a second layer of subordinates, who headed rebel cells in flashpoint cities such as Samarra and Fallujah and who passed the orders down through several tiers to the lowest level operatives.
"He would give very general guidance like, 'Hey, I'd like to see more attacks,' " the major said. "His enablers would then go out to the various tiers below them and give specific guidance, money and weapons."
By capturing Saddam and several leaders of his Fedayeen fighters, the Americans believe that they have dealt a serious blow to the Ba'athist insurgency.
It is unclear, however, whether the recent breakthroughs will have a significant impact on the home-grown and foreign Islamic fundamentalist guerrillas motivated by religious fervour and hatred of America.
Meanwhile, two more attacks were reported on former senior Ba'athists in the holy city of Najaf, where Shia Islamic leaders have also been targeted. In one incident, the five-year-old son of a former Ba'athist official was shot dead when attackers fired at his mother.
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: actively; attacks; directing; forces; guerrillas; insurgents; intelligence; involved; saddam; us; viceisclosed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
1
posted on
12/20/2003 4:17:40 PM PST
by
blam
To: blam
American officials have made clear that he will lose his rights as a prisoner of war if he was involved in the post-war violence.Stick a fork in Dean. This makes the "Mission Accomplished" and "End of Major Operations" pronouncement by Bush as the time when war hostilities should've ceased. Beyond that, Saddam was a terrorist.
Dean etal have to make the case that Bush shouldn't have marked that point and that Saddam should then still deserve POW treatment.
2
posted on
12/20/2003 4:23:40 PM PST
by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: blam; Travis McGee; harpseal; Squantos; Southack
Despite the bewildered appearance of the deposed dictator when he was hauled from his hiding-hole last weekend, he is believed to have been issuing regular instructions on targets and tactics through five trusted lieutenants. Now we know why liberals were so upset Saddam was caught.
It means less dead American soldiers.
That is something that must crush their spirit.
3
posted on
12/20/2003 4:23:51 PM PST
by
Lazamataz
(Posted by SarcastoTron version 1.2 (c) 2001. All rights reserved.)
To: sam_paine
Stick a fork in Dean.That ain't good. We should prop Dean up.
Clarke is aiming to put Hitlery as the VP candidate. It's a win-win-win for them all. The libs will flock to the Clarke ticket. Hillary, if she loses, will have national presidential campaign exposure. And if Clark/Clinton wins, Hillary makes sure the bolts on Air Force One are loose.
4
posted on
12/20/2003 4:27:02 PM PST
by
Lazamataz
(Posted by SarcastoTron version 1.2 (c) 2001. All rights reserved.)
To: blam
I can hardly wait for this to break into the media. Ought to be good for a real laugh to see how they try to spin this.
5
posted on
12/20/2003 4:27:41 PM PST
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: Lazamataz
Clark/Hillary? that is more of a losing ticket than Dean/Gephart. Bring it on!
To: Lazamataz
............. RATS !
7
posted on
12/20/2003 4:31:13 PM PST
by
Squantos
(Support Mental Health !........or........ I'LL KILL YOU !!!!)
To: blam
Alright!
Penalty flag for piling on!
Come on, now, give the libs and the Dems a break....they've had enough bad news this week to last a whole Presidential election cycle.
Penalty assessed: 1"
Onward.....O Osaaaaaaammmmaaaaa! [during the Dem Convention???????? ]
8
posted on
12/20/2003 4:32:35 PM PST
by
TomGuy
To: Lazamataz
Now we know why liberals were so upset Saddam was caught.
It means less dead American soldiers.
That is something that must crush their spirit. True, and I think it goes a bit beyond that. They were banking on dead American soldiers in order to achieve political gains. Disgusting pieces of filth, to a man.
To: blam
A friend (x-navy enlisted) just commented proudly, on behalf of all enlisted, that Saddam was captured by a private and a corporal.
To: Lazamataz
Maybe it's my imagination...and wishful thinking, but it seems that since the capture of Saddam, not only do the attacks appear to be down, but US forces seem to be on the offensive. I'm just not hearing the daily barrage of bad news I've become accustomed to from the media. Am I missing these stories or is this the turning point.
11
posted on
12/20/2003 4:45:00 PM PST
by
cwb
(ç†)
To: truth_seeker
A friend (x-navy enlisted) just commented proudly, on behalf of all enlisted, that Saddam was captured by a private and a corporal.
It would be great to see some of their letters to family and friends. lol.
12
posted on
12/20/2003 4:52:26 PM PST
by
TomGuy
To: cwboelter
The media, the left, the liberals, the Dems were so shocked and awed by so many recent events, they had to take a breather. They couldn't spin fast enough to keep up with the great news items. It tuckered them.
But, not to worry; they will recover and be just as, or more, vicious between now and Nov election 2004. It is still almost a year away and they haven't even begun their attacking.
13
posted on
12/20/2003 4:55:39 PM PST
by
TomGuy
To: Agnes Heep
I believe that most FReepers were opposed to the Kosovo war. However, I can't remember any of us who wished that American solders/airman would die so that we could show that Clinton was wrong in getting us involved in that pointless war.
The RATS high five each other each time an American serviceman is hurt in Iraq. They are disgusting and we can't let them win.
14
posted on
12/20/2003 4:56:37 PM PST
by
07055
To: truth_seeker
"A friend (x-navy enlisted) just commented proudly, on behalf of all enlisted, that Saddam was captured by a private and a corporal." And the intelligence officers who figured out where to send the private and corporal were a.) a reserve lieutenant (female) and b.) a corporal who was a 34-yr old English teacher on 9/10/01, quit his job and enlisted.
All in all, it was a triumph of the ordinary American. Special people from a special country...
15
posted on
12/20/2003 4:59:02 PM PST
by
okie01
(www.ArmorforCongress.com...because Congress isn't for the morally halt and the mentally lame.)
To: sam_paine
Stick a fork in Dean. This makes the "Mission Accomplished" and "End of Major Operations" pronouncement by Bush as the time when war hostilities should've ceased. Beyond that, Saddam was a terrorist.Don't count on the average Socialist/Marxist Dean supporter to understand what you just pointed out, however IF they do get it, don't expect them to give a damn.
16
posted on
12/20/2003 5:02:11 PM PST
by
PISANO
(God Bless our Troops........They will not TIRE - They will not FALTER - They will not FAIL!!!!!)
To: blam
But..but, on the Today Show, Qatie al-Qouric grit her teeth and told Lt. Gen. Sanchez that it was obvious that Saddam was in no position to be in command of anything. The farmhouse didn't even have a phone!
17
posted on
12/20/2003 5:04:34 PM PST
by
AF68
To: Lazamataz
Even Clark isn't stupid enough to have Hillary as VP.....although they could leak it to the media and then VOILA Clark could not accept the Hildebeast. It's the same scenario that Gore got with Joey....the Cliontons leaked Joe as VP 6 HOURS before Gore called Joey.
To: okie01
Dean's comment that America is no safer than before 9/11 is utterly scurrilous.It says that he is betting that America will be hit this year and he will be able to reap the harvest. The Democraps have a vested interest in disaster.
19
posted on
12/20/2003 5:11:37 PM PST
by
basque69
To: Ann Archy
Even Clark isn't stupid enough to have Hillary as VP....Let's remember this. If I'm wrong, I'll be embarrassed. If you're wrong, you get to be embarrassed. :o)
20
posted on
12/20/2003 5:18:10 PM PST
by
Lazamataz
(Posted by SarcastoTron version 1.2 (c) 2001. All rights reserved.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson