Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Top Gun [Smith and Wesson .500 Magnum]
Popular Mechanics ^ | 2003 | CHRIS CHRISTIAN

Posted on 12/16/2003 4:55:50 PM PST by 45Auto

In the 1971 movie "Dirty Harry," actor Clint Eastwood introduced the world to the double-action Smith & Wesson Model 29 .44-cal. Magnum revolver--"the most powerful handgun in the world."

It was a crown S&W wore proudly, albeit briefly.

The rising popularity of handgun hunting for big game (spurred largely by the .44 Magnum itself) prompted the introduction of newer and significantly more powerful revolver cartridges. Many powerful enough that they had to be chambered in single-action handguns because existing double-action designs could not contain the recoil forces and pressures they produced.

Since S&W does not make single-action revolvers, and no double-action frame at its disposal could handle the new loads, S&W was effectively dethroned.

At the 2003 Shooting, Hunting and Outdoor Trade (SHOT) Show, the manufacturer regained its crown. And, most significantly, it did it by introducing a new massive double-action revolver that is chambered for an equally new .50-cal. cartridge.

The S&W X-frame Model 500 is a brawny handgun designed to master the most rigorous hunting fields in the world. It is not a revolver one would, or likely could, tuck into a waistband. In fact, to call it massive is an understatement.

With its 8-3/8-in. barrel, the overall length of the Model 500 is 15 in. and the empty weight is 4.5 pounds. The cylinder alone is almost 2 in. in diameter and approaches 2.25 in. in length. Thumb the cylinder open and five charge holes await. Each is 1/2 in. in diameter, and the .50-cal. cartridges they hold are almost 2 in. long. Load five of them and the total weight of the handgun climbs to 5 pounds.

You don't just casually pick up a Model 500. You have to lift it.

Fire even one of those big cartridges and you'll appreciate why the weight and mass are there.

When the .44 Magnum laid claim to being the most powerful handgun in the world, its standard load produced about 900 ft.-lb. of muzzle energy. Several new loads have since eclipsed that, but the handgun most commonly used by big game hunters is the .454 Casull, which will generate about 1900 ft.-lb.

The 500 S&W Magnum will produce almost 2600 ft.-lb. with its heaviest load, and more powerful loads may well be on the way.

If Dirty Harry felt that the .44 Magnum would make his day, the new 500 S&W Magnum would certainly make his decade. It is the largest double-action revolver available, and there is no production revolver in the world--single or double action--capable of matching, or even approaching, the level of power it produces.

Harnessing that power in a double-action revolver, however, required some departures from traditional designs.

Rethinking Double-Action Design No frame in the S&W line was capable of containing the 500 Magnum, so the new X-frame was designed specifically for the 500's .50-cal. cartridge. It is massive. But, just making a bigger double-action revolver was not the solution. A major concern was the barrel-to-frame connection. This is traditionally done by simply screwing the barrel into the front of the frame, but this design places all firing stress at that one point. To increase strength throughout the 500's barrel assembly, S&W opted for a composite barrel/shroud system.

A stainless steel barrel tube is torqued into the frame to form a solid rear attachment point. A separate, heavy stainless steel shroud is then slipped over the barrel and braced against the forward portion of the frame. The muzzle end of the barrel bears against the forward end of the shroud, and a separate compensator/muzzle brake is then rotated into place under torque at the muzzle end of the shroud.

This arrangement compresses the shroud and places the barrel tube under tension for its entire length. In effect, the barrel and shroud act as linear springs to distribute the stress of firing across the entire barrel/shroud component instead of focusing it all at the single junction of the barrel and frame.

Maintaining precise cylinder alignment was another concern. Traditional designs utilize a front- and rear-cylinder lockup, with the forward end of the ejector rod bearing against a ball-detent fixture on the barrel to provide the front lockup. Given the power of the 500 Magnum, the potential for flex in the ejector rod had to be addressed. The solution was to dispense with that design and install a massive ball-detent lock on the frame itself, directly below the barrel forcing cone. This mates with the yoke to provide a solid front lockup directly at the front of the cylinder. Combined with the traditional rear lockup, this is the strongest cylinder alignment design possible.

While the 500 S&W Magnum answers the question of "where's the beef?" the company wisely decided to incorporate the same grip dimensions found on its much smaller K-frame handguns. Experienced handgunners regard this as one of the best handgun grips ever made.

Thus, the 500 Magnum is a big revolver that's strong where it needs to be, but is comfortable to handle. That was borne out during firing tests.

The Hunter version of the 500 S&W Magnum comes out of the S&W Performance Center. This gun has a 10.5-in. barrel and measures 18 in. overall. It weighs a hefty 82 ounces. Features include a recoil compensator for increased muzzle control, tuned Performance Center action, gun rug and sling.

SPECIFICATIONS: 500 S&W Magnum (Shown in lead photo) Caliber: .500 S&W Magnum Barrel: 8-3/8 in. Capacity: 5 rounds Front Sight: Interchangeable black blade Rear Sight: Micrometer click-adjustable black blade Grips: Hogue rubber, energy absorbing Weight (empty) : 72.5 ounces Material: Stainless steel Finish: Satin stainless Overall length: 15 in. Other features: Internal key lock and recoil muzzle compensator

On The Firing Line Despite the power of the cartridge, the 500 S&W Magnum is surprisingly controllable. Due largely to the sheer mass of the revolver (combined with the muzzle-heavy balance and an excellent muzzle brake), the violent wrist-wrenching muzzle whip associated with single-action revolvers firing such powerful loads as the .454 Casull and the .475 Linebaugh has been tamed considerably.

In those guns, muzzle rise on recoil can reach 90° and present a hazard to the shooter. With even the heaviest 500 Magnum load tested, muzzle rise was confined to the 50° range and there was never any concern about the shooter wearing an imprint of the front sight in his forehead. That does not mean it's a pussycat. Make no mistake about it, this is not a handgun for the timid or the inexperienced. In comparison tests, the lightest 500 load--the 275-grain jacketed hollowpoint at 1665-ft.-per-second (fps) velocity--produced a modest, but noticeable, increase in recoil levels over a S&W Model 629 .44 Magnum. Anyone who is uncomfortable with the .44 Magnum will be decidedly uncomfortable with the 500 Magnum. The 440 cast-lead load at 1625 fps raised the recoil bar significantly. Muzzle rise still remained under 50° and placed little or no stress on the wrists, but the rearward thrust absorbed by the shooting hand began to become uncomfortable after 10 to 15 rounds. A shooting glove would have mitigated some of that.

Still, considering that the projectile weight and velocity of this load is virtually identical to a 1-ounce 12-ga. rifled lead shotgun slug--and that the 500 Magnum operates at over four times the pressure level of the slug--the recoil was less than expected. We'd say that Dirty Harry would certainly approve.

Creating The 500 S&W Magnum Round

Photo by Spencer Jones

One of the more unusual aspects of the Model 500's creation is that S&W developed the cartridge first. Only when the gunsmiths had the performance levels they wanted, did they design and build the revolver that would fire it.

The cartridge design was handled by Cor Bon of Sturgis, S.D., which has extensive experience in that field. The guidelines the company received were firm: The bullet had to be precisely .50-cal., and the operating pressure could not exceed 50,000 psi. It had to produce at least 2200 ft.-lb. of energy with its heavier loads, and the overall cartridge length could not exceed a certain figure.

According to Cor Bon, the task was easier than it sounds.

Research determined that no existing cartridge case would meet the specifications, so a completely new, straight-walled .50-cal. case, measuring 1.625 in. in length (using standard large-pistol Magnum primers) was designed and produced. A pressure barrel was built, and the testing of powder and bullet combinations began.

It quickly became apparent that the energy requirements could easily be met, and at significantly lower pressures than the maximum allowed. The search then turned to those specific bullets that would provide the best terminal performance. That was done through actual hunting field tests and took almost a year. The quest for the best bullets continues, but at press time Cor Bon was offering three effective loads.

The "light" load is a 275-grain Barnes X copper hollowpoint bullet. Muzzle velocity is 1665 fps and it produces 1668 ft.-lb. of energy. It is more than adequate for any game up to and including elk.

A 400-grain jacketed softpoint at 1675 fps and 2500 ft.-lb. of energy is available for larger game.

Those heading to Alaska, Africa or even Jurassic Park will want the 440-grain hard-cast lead, gas checked, flat point load. At 1625 fps and 2580 ft.-lb. of energy, it will handle anything a handgun hunter is likely to pursue.

A 385-grain flat based spitzer load was to be available by press time. Cor Bon says this may be the best all-around load for the 500 S&W.

Additional loads may well be more powerful. There is enough room in the cartridge case and revolver cylinder to handle bullet weights up to 500 grains, which will make the Model 500 suitable for any game animal on Earth.--C.C.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: bang; bangbang; bangbangbang; banglist; bfg; rkba
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-143 next last
To: Lancey Howard
Have ya seen Larry's .380 version yet ? I have one on order but wait is long. My .32 is any indication of quality then the 380 flavor should be fine....

Stay Safe !

81 posted on 12/16/2003 11:43:25 PM PST by Squantos (Support Mental Health !........or........ I'LL KILL YOU !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
I'll stick with my 454's from Ruger ... nice powerful and packable.

Even more packable when you cut the barrel to 2.75" ;)

82 posted on 12/16/2003 11:56:06 PM PST by Centurion2000 (Resolve to perform what you ought, perform without fail what you resolve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squantos
I shall check out the .380.
I am fortunate to have a very good gun store in the neighborhood here. It wouldn't surprise me to find they have one or two of those. I'll have to find some time to browse a little this week. I'm in the mood for another gun anyway.

Regards,
LH
83 posted on 12/17/2003 12:02:09 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
Kewl Lancey......if Ya get to lay hands on one give us a short review here if ya will. I've got confidence in Seecamp but would just like em to speed up their orders a bit. Guess that's what makes em "special".........:o)

Stay safe !

84 posted on 12/17/2003 12:08:34 AM PST by Squantos (Support Mental Health !........or........ I'LL KILL YOU !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: BooBoo1000
Do you have problems with wild Elephants??

Well, you never know, do you? One minute you're mowing your lawn, or watching T.V. Then, BAM!, a brontosaurus lumbers into your dining room.

Just like the Boy Scout Motto says: "Be Prepared" (For Elephants)


85 posted on 12/17/2003 12:11:37 AM PST by MrJingles ("Democracy is doomed once the majority realizes that it controls the public treasury." - - Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball
You continue to boycott them because S & W still has an agreement with the federal government. That it isn't being enforced at the moment isn't significant in the overall scheme of things.

When a firearms company makes an agreement similar to S & W's the owner of the company (Tompkins, PLC) should have to sell the pieces at auction as a result of a bankruptcy. Selling the company, and it's obligations, keeps the agreement alive and reduces the parent organization's loss. That's not good enough. The price for entering into such an agreement should be complete financial loss and the end of the company.

86 posted on 12/17/2003 5:51:16 AM PST by caltrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
As far as I know S&W has distanced themselves from the prior ownership and their deplorable actions. Yeah, I think it's OK, I can't see punishing a new ownership group that didn't have anything to do with that mess. I'm more down on glock now than S&W. And I own a model 20 glock. We sure need to support the good guys.
87 posted on 12/17/2003 8:37:50 AM PST by bereanway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: caltrop
If this agreement is still in effect do you know if it would be possible for the new ownership and this present administration to break the agreement? If it's still in effect it could be a real problem down the road when and if the anti-gunners get back in power.
88 posted on 12/17/2003 8:46:26 AM PST by bereanway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: bereanway
My understanding, and I'm not an attorney nor particularly familiar with the case, is that they can't break it. Your concern about anti-gunners is precisely my point.

Maybe there's someone out there who can answer the question with certainty. If so, I'd be very interested in reading his comments.

89 posted on 12/17/2003 9:19:50 AM PST by caltrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Squantos; Travis McGee
I confess publicly to never having shot a pistol beyond a .44 magnum in power. I love big wheelguns and would enjoy the opportunity.

Looks like there is a lot to choose from nowadays and the S/W 50 is the current king of the hill is it not?...stock that is...

My favorite "pistol" ever was the old Bushy Armspistol we had as a boatgun.....with a 30 round bananna. It got sold sadly...

I am quite happy with the matching Vaqueros we have in 44mag and 45LC now....single action has to become second nature....it's a learned skill no doubt.
90 posted on 12/17/2003 10:05:37 AM PST by wardaddy ("either the arabs are at your throat, or at your feet"...at our feet today obviously..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
Ahhhh the "IMP" gun..........I carried one when I was a puppy pusher for a while. Albeit mine was in .221 fireball it did have one of the early 30 round magazines. They had brought em in for use by some pilots if they wanted em....... pilots back then tend to carry spare radios's versus spare ammo and weapons. They were in our armory for safekeeping so I "borrowed one" for my beyond the wire work with my littly doggie.

Bullet hose extrodinare fer sure ! Great room broom.........:o)

Stay Safe !

91 posted on 12/17/2003 10:16:13 AM PST by Squantos (Support Mental Health !........or........ I'LL KILL YOU !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Squantos
If the AWB dies....I bet we could see the IMP return in some form.
92 posted on 12/17/2003 10:19:36 AM PST by wardaddy ("either the arabs are at your throat, or at your feet"...at our feet today obviously..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
Ah, give me the Springfield 1911 anyday.
93 posted on 12/17/2003 10:20:08 AM PST by miloklancy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
Yeah but consider the Glock 18 w/ a 32 round stick for neat and tidy carry. That IMP was a beast even at it's small size. I have a AR-Pistol that is as close as I really need but your correct. It would be a kewl tewl to drag out of the safe for range day .

Stay Safe !

94 posted on 12/17/2003 10:28:56 AM PST by Squantos (Support Mental Health !........or........ I'LL KILL YOU !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Thanks for the flag I think I will have to get one just to have it.
95 posted on 12/17/2003 12:27:00 PM PST by harpseal (Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
This one is about the size and weight of my Taurus .22 Hornet 8-shot.
96 posted on 12/17/2003 12:31:56 PM PST by RightWhale (Close your tag lines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
my forearms and biceps will develop quite nicely just lifting that thing.

It's too much for off-hand. Two hands, and your back will eventually develop bone spurs and stuff anyway.

97 posted on 12/17/2003 12:38:29 PM PST by RightWhale (Close your tag lines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
Covet, covet, covet.

Brings to mind a line fro "A Christas Story: "You'll put your eye out with that thing"....

98 posted on 12/17/2003 12:38:50 PM PST by tracer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spodefly
"My wrist started hurting just looking at the picture."

Sounds sorta kinky..... 8~)

99 posted on 12/17/2003 12:40:21 PM PST by tracer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Squantos
Go for it...

100 posted on 12/17/2003 12:41:25 PM PST by Tijeras_Slim (Saddam looked like he could use a "Baath Party".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-143 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson