You continue to boycott them because S & W still has an agreement with the federal government. That it isn't being enforced at the moment isn't significant in the overall scheme of things.
When a firearms company makes an agreement similar to S & W's the owner of the company (Tompkins, PLC) should have to sell the pieces at auction as a result of a bankruptcy. Selling the company, and it's obligations, keeps the agreement alive and reduces the parent organization's loss. That's not good enough. The price for entering into such an agreement should be complete financial loss and the end of the company.
If this agreement is still in effect do you know if it would be possible for the new ownership and this present administration to break the agreement? If it's still in effect it could be a real problem down the road when and if the anti-gunners get back in power.